Tomorrow
Now you're getting it, kiddo.
Tomorrow
IIt does. It says Butler is a minimum player..
Is that hard to understand?
You assumed I meant something else..
You're reaching Jimmertacular levels of fail right now. Just admit your defeat, son, and move on.
Obviously not. But I'd expect for y'all to at least make simple player evaluations..
Defeat on what?
The words you used said you meant something else.
Even if we accept your new explanation, it still doesn't help your case.
We all know that Butler is a minimum player. That fact says absolutely nothing about his current value to the Spurs, or about his relative value to the Spurs compared to Martin potential value to the Spurs on Feb 29, 2016.
Next.
But what if Spurs cut Butler for Martin?
I've already expressed my opinion on that subject.
Next.
Thanks...and my understanding is they don't necessarily have to sign with anybody by this deadline. They just need to be bought out/waived by this time to be playoff eligible for this year.
Oh you just couldn't admit that I was right?? lol
No hard feelings bro
You can't argue with a fool. Even if you're 110% right, they wouldn't be able to comprehend it. People who declare themselves victor or use dismissal antics arnt here for discussion. Unless you want to see who can declare themselves the winner the "most" I'd suggest you move on...![]()
BTW, that's like 98% of spurstalk. The Junk DNA of the forum.
Waivers must be requested by tomorrow's deadline. Clearing waivers, agreeing to buyout terms, and signing with a new team can all happen at a later date.
You're right b/c The contract says so!!!!!!!!!!!!
The meltdown continues.
I'm not melting down. Lol I haven't even created a thread that I'm suspending myself from ST.
I know. I've been posting since 06'...
I don't live here like most do.
That would be an epic meltdown. Yours is the garden variety.
Fair enough. I guess we will have to wait and see...
Has he signed yet?
![]()
no that's not what I'm saying, I'm saying his usage rate will drop, he will have less touches assisted or not, naturally your shooting % is usually better because your shot selection is better (see Parker Tony for instance). I'm also saying his mid range jumpers inefficiency at .38 is irrelevant... You said he will play same role as Beli and I'm fine with that, Beli was shooting in average two mid range per game so yeah getting .38 out of them or .45 won't change much the outcome of a game. Then I'd be curious to see the numbers showing he is shooting better when not assisted, I believe if you make that call, you must have something to back it up.
Or like West he is too old for 20 mpg and 9 FGAs per game. I just don't see how this logic would work for West but not for Mart. Parker is shooting better this year than previous years and he is not getting more lay ups than before, his role is just different with less load to carry and less minutes resulting in a better shot selection, less fatigue then better efficiency. Again I don't see why this could not apply for a guy like KMart.
Not sure why bringing jimmer into that, different player, different role, different age, different everything actually. I'm fine with you saying dude sucks and he is not a good fit but bringing his FG% of his season with Minny is irrelevant.
No I believe the way Spurs will use him as low usage rate coming off the bench for 10/15 mpg ala Beli shooting 3s he could be useful for a vet min price. I also say who cares about his mid range JS for 2 FGAs ? I also say .37 is not a bad % from 3 even though it is inferior to team's average that has anyway a low % of 3s FGAs compared to previous seasons. Are you implying with the Spurs he could not average 2-3 FGAs at .37 and he will become TOV prone or something ? You take him because its cheap, because he can shoot 3s and you are lacking 3s and he can bring the ball to half court without losing it.
this cracks me up every time
Austin Daye? Spurs waived him last season.
Got until 12 AM EST for a buy out to occur.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)