Reply With Quote
This response indicates Boots is wounded.
Her best argument is that Bernie Sanders hasn't released his tax return
I have no idea how anybody can stand behind this snake
There's a reason that hasn't happened yet, it's because no one's ing asked or given enough of a to ask for his tax returns.
This response indicates Boots is wounded.
He has released 2014Her best argument is that Bernie Sanders hasn't released his tax return
There's a reason that hasn't happened yet, it's because no one's ing asked or given enough of a to ask for his tax returns.
Releasing ones tax return is ing pointless. I dont know why they have to even do that.Her best argument is that Bernie Sanders hasn't released his tax return
There's a reason that hasn't happened yet, it's because no one's ing asked or given enough of a to ask for his tax returns.
But that said, he has been asking her to release her speeches for months while not bothering to release his tax returns like the rest have done. It's a double standard.
You're calling out someone for not doing exactly what you're doing. I dont care if it's something as meaningless as tax returns.
No it's not comparable at all. He's known for having one of the lowest net worths among public officials. We all know damn well there won't anything noteworthy. It was just a poor attempt by Shillary to deflect. That's why she hadn't brought it up until now.
Additionally, he said he will release all of them. He's probably just milking this. Would be smart to release some on Monday before the primary and to keep releasing them througgout these elections to drive home the point that she has to hide and he doesn't. Shillary OTOH responded like a snake when pressed about releasing the transcripts.
Last edited by FkLA; 04-16-2016 at 07:34 PM.
The minute she called him out for not releasing his 2014 return, he released it immediately.
Now that Sanders has released his return, what's Shillary's excuse for not releasing her goldman sachs transcripts?
You're seriously re ed if you think Shillary really cared about Sanders' tax return and wasn't just deflecting from having to reveal how much she was regularly kissing wall street's ass before she started pretending to be a socialist.
He released his 2014 return on Friday and it showed like $200k of total income between him and his wife
Additionally, he said he will release all of them. He's probably just milking this. Would be smart to release some on Monday before the primary and to keep releasing them througgout these elections to drive home the point that she has to hide and he doesn't. Shillary OTOH responded like a snake when pressed about releasing the transcripts.. He has his salary as a senator and not much else, it's the tax return of a boring upper middle class couple.
Shillary probably makes more just from a 1 hour speech she gives at the Goldman Sachs headquarters about how Wall Street deserves no blame for the financial crisis.
Tbh..that speech is probably the run of the mill kiss ass they would want to hear from a politician. I dont think there is some dark secret in there other than her saying what they wanted to hear.
She probably doesn't want to release them because it will contradict what she's been saying that she has gone against them or whatever. It would have serve her well to have release them long ago but now its too late because she's lied too much about it. The minute she releases them and the scripts are all rosy cheeks she's going to look real bad.
Can she be any more obvious she has something to hide regarding transcript revealing.Her best argument is that Bernie Sanders hasn't released his tax return
There's a reason that hasn't happened yet, it's because no one's ing asked or given enough of a to ask for his tax returns.
What a twunt answer. Kudos to that moderator for not letting her weasel.
Just as obvious as tax evader Bishop Gekko and Queen Anne not releasing but their 3 most recent years.
Yeah I'm pretty surprised that a moderator with the Clinton News Network didn't let her off the hook.
And there's nothing wrong with that?
I have a hard time believing it was just run of the mill "we need companies like (insert any bank here) because they create jobs and stimulate the economy!" horse you typically hear from mainstream politicians (on either side). She wouldn't be trying to hide it if it was only that. I think she took at a step further and made a few "47%" type comments about distressed homeowners or went off about how this country has too many "takers".And there's nothing wrong with that?
Neither this nor the email thing would be that big a deal except the way Shillary handled both demonstrates how superior she feels to the rest of the country. She truly thinks as a presidential candidate that she isn't obligated to explain why her emails were on a private server or what she's saying behind closed doors to people who don't reflect middle class Americans at all.
Hillary saying "we're all in this together" is pure bull , because BigFinance, regulated and unregulated/private, was saying they had been cheated by borrowers and it was all the borrower's fault. They blamed CRA for "forcing" them to write bad loans.
Predatory lenders, violating Federal rules by writing "liar's loans", etc, helped by fraudulent MERS stole Ms of homes, esp from first-time borrowers lied into believing they could afford their first home.
Attendees said Hillary was placing 50% of the blame on the borrowers, which is a huge lie, telegraphing to BigFinance that she was their non-punising, regulatory friend.
Hillary Clinton’s Disastrous California Poll
On the surface, the new California Field Poll really wasn’t bad for Hillary Clinton.
Yes, her one-time 63 point lead had shrunken to six, but it was still a lead, and at this point the Clinton campaign reckons that it won enough delegates in the South on Super Tuesday to hold on even if Sanders were to continue his winning streak – so long as their campaign manages not to implode.
And while such an implosion must still be regarded as a long shot, the Field Poll numbers suggest that there are grounds for one:
Only 48 percent of voters polled in the nation’s most populous state viewed Clinton favorably, compared to 49 percent who looked upon her unfavorably.
Which once again raises the question of why Democratic Party leaders seem resigned to allowing such an unpopular candidate to carry their banner in November, particularly given that this a not a one-state anomaly, but a nationwide phenomenon.
In contrast to Clinton, Sanders enjoyed a twenty point (55-35%) favorable cushion.
He did better than Clinton both among Democrats and Republicans, but his real edge came among independents who liked him by a 63-27% margin and disliked Clinton by 50-44%.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/20...alifornia-poll
Everything is semen shielding to you. Get a new schtick and dont get so mad about something neither of us have any say or control.And there's nothing wrong with that?
I hope Hillary goes to her own foundation and tells them to "cut it out"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwo.../#112e2849321b
About?
What exactly is it you think you're doing? You're guzzling Bernie by the gallon.
Poor you. By Tuesday night you'll have run out of tears when he gets tear a new asshole.
You're a Shillary shill, just own it.
That's highly unlikely.
If she gets the nomination and Trump does too, it is the only way I will be voting. Same if Bernie.
The problem you people have is if someone even attempts to have a fair discussion, its automatically semen shielding because I dont agree with what you say. That's not how discussions work. I have defended both sides.
I'll admit I have been arguing for Hillary a while but that's because the Bernie suckage here is terribly one sided and most of her critisism is not even warranted. Just because you dont like the lady doesn't mean you can make up.
Me siding with her has nothing to do with me liking her as much as it has to do with the loser Bernie supporters talking so much trash like he's God. Both are full of . Period.
Reck is one of the "i'm not a trump fan, but" people except for shillary
Reck is one of the "i'm not a trump fan, but" people except for shillary
I'm a democrat. republicans.
I like all my democrat liberal fellows.
But it's funny you should say that because a few months back Mitch and I were posting a lot here about Trump and Marco.
I supposed because I felt Marco was the least y of the republican candidates and felt kind of bad for him that it would also made me a Marco semen shield according to Soza, you and sanityannex.
But it's funny you should say that because a few months back Mitch and I were posting a lot here about Trump and Marco.
I supposed because I felt Marco was the least y of the republican candidates and felt kind of bad for him that it would also made me a Marco semen shield according to Soza, you and sanityannex.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
