Bruh I know you're ESL, so I'll explain this slowly.
The Raptors and Hawks (last year) both put up 50 win seasons. DPG says their records are "fluky". I'm taking that to mean in context of vastly overachieving.
A team with 50+ wins should be a le contender. They aren't.
I'm applying this same logic to the Spurs' 50 win seasons between 2008 and 2012. The Spurs should have been le contenders during that period. They obviously weren't looking at their playoff performance.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...65#post8553465
this is the kind of i'm talking about