Reply With Quote
Danny Green is the chip, and a PG is the option.
I'm also guessing Denzel Valentine. His versatility is a perfect fit for the Spurs.
Danny Green is the chip, and a PG is the option.
See you later Danny
I read those as "Kyle Anderson, Kyle Anderson, Kyle Anderson, Kyle Anderson, Kyle Anderson. More..."
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
This has to be one of the worst takes I've seen in a while.That's a great point.
Some like GSH have advocated the youth movement with an intention to minitank a season.
It's time to find out who of our recent draft picks, the stashes, the dleague projects are going to make it, develop these guys + add a young role player here or there to find out if they still have upside.
.
Yeah lets just tank next year and have a 82 game try-out with all the stashes, draftpicks and d-league prospects in the Spurs pipeline....
I'm sure Kawhi, and LA will appreciate that.
You should go post on Spursreport.
SATranny is the worst.
well, him and cry havoc, and harlem heat
You apparently can't read, and also misquote.
I was making a reference to GSH who was advocating a tank. I am not and I don't think we will even if we add younger roleplayers bc we need to.
Then you weren't here when someone suggested to dump Parker and start Danny Green at pg.
I hope it's not LDN. I still see his defense as an important part of any possible compe ive team next year.
Same, but I honestly think the Spurs see his value as being far less than we do.
Thon Maker plz
They say this before each draft. Happened just once.
I'm sure they're doing their due diligence. Far more likely to trade out of the 1st round. I wouldn't mind a trade of 29 and 59 for Bucks's 36 and 38, though I can't see them carrying too many rookies on the roster, especially if they're bringing Bertans and possibly LJC over.
Just a reminder we traded 59 for Ray Mac.
Thanks, realized it as soon as I posted59 doesn't have much value anyway.
Might not have to trade up for him considering he's projected as a late 1st/Early 2nd-Rounder at this point.
Here is the poor man's Russell Westbrook:
Former teammates Kevin Durant and James Harden are "hanging out" together this week, but the close friends' brief reunion isn't expected to have a real impact on Durant's forthcoming free agency, according to league sources.
Sources told ESPN.com that Harden's Houston Rockets are not a team Durant plans to consider when he becomes an unrestricted free agent July 1, despite Harden's presence there and the Rockets' long-known intent to try to chase him.
At least one picture of Durant and Harden at a restaurant has circulated this week via Instagram, leading to inevitable speculation about Harden trying to recruit his former Thunder colleague to Houston. But sources insist the visit is nothing out of the ordinary for them, given the players' long-standing friendship and particularly because Houston, sources say, is not a destination Durant intends to consider.
The league office, furthermore, has historically chosen not to apply NBA tampering rules to players from rival teams who have contact with free agents before July 1, which is the first day teams can legally engage with free agents.
ESPN.com reported after Oklahoma City's recent elimination in the Western Conference finals that a return for Durant to the Thunder on a two-year max contract, with a player option to return to free agency in the summer of 2017, is widely regarded as the most likely scenario for him in his first foray into free agency.
But Durant is also widely expected to take a handful of face-to-face recruiting meetings with a select group of interested teams, with the Golden State Warriors and San Antonio Spurs regarded by many rival executives as the two biggest threats to lure Durant away from the Thunder.
Yet numerous teams, such as the Rockets, are likely to try their luck, regardless of their slim chances. Boston Celtics All-Star guard Isaiah Thomas, for example, revealed to the Boston Globe his fairly determined plans to try to recruit Durant to the Celtics earlier this week.
Not much we already don't know. Houston is a very close to hitting rock bottom, but it sounds like something is intriguing him about the Spurs even if he beat us. He knows coming to S.A. he is guaranteed to get back to the conference finals to get his hands on a possibly weaker Warriors team next season.
If KD stays put in OKC, it's still a 3-way dogfight in the West with the pecking order being GSW, OKC and SA.
If KD joins SA, it's suddenly a 2-way battle between GSW and SA. SA has the defenders to deal with the Splash Brothers, while KD may provide sufficient offensive firepower to enable SA to edge GSW.
But if KD joins GSW, SA may as well start rebuilding.
worst article. worst site.
Why is Golden State not a likely place for Durant? Cap space?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
