Reply With Quote
ITT lobs clinging to the hope of no indictment. Literally their only chance.
He's made an artform out of saying stupid . At least with him it's funny in a farcical sense. The others around here with the shrill need of attention through stark racism, sexism, and the like not so much.
Nice to see you posting more often once more.
And same for repubs...indictment literally their only chance.
holy !
Nixon/Repugs SCUTTLED the 1968 Paris peace talks just before the election, denying the Dems/Hubert Humphrey/LBJ the campaign boosting credit.
Nixon/Repugs PROLONGED the VN war by many years, many 100Ks of American death and injuries. The DIRTY TRICK "better deal" the secretly Repugs promised the N Vietnamese turned out to be 7 more years of death and destruction of Viet Nam, plus the bombing of Cambodia.
"Nixon was ending the Vietnam War"
While I agree Nixon was corrupt, I don't buy that he was able to scuttle the talks and I also won't deny it was his concessions regarding a ceasefire that got it to work.holy !
Nixon/Repugs SCUTTLED the 1968 Paris peace talks just before the election, denying the Dems/Hubert Humphrey/LBJ the campaign boosting credit.
Nixon/Repugs PROLONGED the VN war by many years, many 100Ks of American death and injuries. The DIRTY TRICK "better deal" the secretly Repugs promised the N Vietnamese turned out to be 7 more years of death and destruction of Viet Nam, plus the bombing of Cambodia.
"Nixon was ending the Vietnam War"
Nice excuse making for your 1968 loss though.
Repugs promised NVN a "better deal" if Nixon won, just like Repugs promised "no retaliation" to the Iranians if they would hold the hostages until/if St Ronnie beat Jimmy. Hole them, denying Carter credit, released them the day St Ronnie was sworn in.
USA didn't attack Iran, but USA did supply and get its proxy Saddam to attack Iran.
And you were telling me not to argue with ideologues.
FuzzyButt will piss away pagesAnd you were telling me not to argue with ideologues.
and I got facts, not ideology.
Proof? Something better than the NBADan, WC, hater, and Darrin posts please.
And you were telling me not to argue with ideologues.
It sure as won't be Trump though.thinking Shillary will be president
Say she does..then comes Bernie and Trump gets beaten even worst. There is no situation in which Trump wins.
You're kidding yourself if you think Bernie is now going to have more of an impact than he ever did as the socialist senator in Vermont who wasn't running for president. Shillary might pretend to care about the progressive wing of the Democratic party just enough to get elected, then she'll go back to being the center right wing corporate pros ute she's been her entire career.
The GOP should be taking notes on all the progressive things Shillary said during the primary that she won't live up to. There's loads of material to choose from.
I might be a "lob" but I would love to see a Shillary indictment, however anyone thinking it'll happen is delusional.
There's no way the Clinton family hasn't already stacked the deck to make sure nothing happens. You really don't think the Clintons will be able to quash a ing email scandal with everything else they've been able to bury
Shouldn't that be clinging to the hope of an indictment?
Anyway Reck shat on that take pretty well already. Trump has no chance against Bernie either.
Considering that he is a leader of the millennial demographic by a large margin over anyone else, your take seems incredibly myopic particularly with the boomer die off accelerating. He's outlined already the types of policies they prefer and more and more candidates are going to try to cater to them given the fact they have taken over as the largest demographic already.
They won't always live with their parents like you do. As they start to actually get jobs and make money they will vote their economic interest.
The baby boomers you despise were the hated Woodstock generation liberals of the 60's and 70's.
I had hair down to the middle of my back and smoked pot like crazy
You can wishcast and make up nonsense all you like but it's typical juvenile tripe plus reductio ad absurdum from you. I do agree in the generational hypocrisy from the predominantly white boomers but given the diverse internal demographics in the millenials and their propensity towards city life, I don't see the analog at all.They won't always live with their parents like you do. As they start to actually get jobs and make money they will vote their economic interest.
The baby boomers you despise were the hated Woodstock generation liberals of the 60's and 70's.
I had hair down to the middle of my back and smoked pot like crazy
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...-voting-224793
More Reagnites and Bu es leaving the GOP ticket.
And I've been thinking about this. The Boomer nostalgia recalls the hippies and the like but when you look at the voting record since 1964 when Boomers started voting and it's not liberal at all.
LBJ and Carter were both southern democrats and not progressive really at all and then you look at Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushes and you really can see which way the wind blows.
The millennials barely started to reach their majority and they elected a black man who promised to be liberal even if he has ended up anything but and are now staunchly behind Sanders.
Boomer priorities have been about as self centered from the beginning. Stop drafting for war, lower taxes, free health care for boomers, and the like. The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1965 and was a trend that had begun with integration that really began in WW2 and in major industries.
The famous boomers were hippies and the like but the rank and file have never voted as such and have always looked out for themselves. It's why it's amusing to see boomer chastising millennials as self centered.
what hilarious bull .
and you can only snark in response to it. youre the hilarious bull around her incarnate, face. For all of LBJ's great society, he was a first class war monger.
Conservative columnist George Will has left the Republican Party.
The longtime commentator reportedly made the announcement during a Federalist Society event in Washington, D.C., on Friday.
Will, who resides in Maryland, said he changed his affiliation this month from Republican to unaffiliated.
A report from PJ Media quoted Will as saying: “This is not my party.”
He also said that it’s too late for the Republican Party to nominate someone who isn’t Donald Trump, an idea that those in the Never Trump movement have been holding on to as the convention nears.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...#ixzz4CdC9cNSs
The illusion of certain republican leaders is wearing off and their true colors as pro-establishment, and self interests are beginning to appear. Hillary will win, but every thing she will do economically will help the rich to get richer, the middle income to get poorer, and the poor to stay right where they are so we can have the same argument in another 4 years. There truly is very little difference between the parties. The arguments that do exist are manufactured to keep us all looking at the magic trick. Plato's, "Myth of the Cave," lives.
http://iowapublicradio.org/post/stat...ll-trump-bigotMany Republicans rebuked presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for his remarks suggesting that Latino and Muslim judges would be unable to rule fairly on a trial involving the candidate. State Senator David Johnson did them one better: he left the party.
"I'm a Republican at heart, but I don't think it's enough to say 'I disagree with Mr. Trump' or 'I find him offensive' or 'I believe his comments are inappropriate' or to actually call him the bigot he is, and then say I'm still going to support him. I thought the mood of the country is we really don't like politicians who say one thing and do another. So I just decided on primary day, on Tuesday to go into the auditor's office and change my registration from Republican to No Party."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions