1/2 way there. I will set aside my temptation to be snarky to someone I don't agree with, and try for a more constructive tack:
Your posted article made a rather strong claim, and this requires evidence, and some reasonable, logical support.
Claims that laws are violated generally require a bit more than rote recital of the law. Definitions, usage of terms, and tests generally have to be met. The posted article was really thin on what part of the code was violated, and silent on how, which is why I suspect you are having difficulty. I will assume that you read the entire question, but will emphasize the part that requires critical/original thinking:
Which part of that law did the DNC break? Be specific, and tell how it was broken..