Reply With Quote
Clinton gaining momentum on all the polls, easy W.
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse for cuckservatives
Just started reading Clinton Cash yesterday, those two take corruption to a whole other level.
Clinton gaining momentum on all the polls, easy W.
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse for cuckservatives
but the Repugs/neocons/MIC lying America into Iraq war and eternal, indecisive GWOT?
"that's not corrupt, Saddam took down WTC and was a Bad Man going to attack USA with WMD."
head Cheney exempting fracking from the Clean Water Act not corrupt?
Bill has completely lost his mojo. Someone should tell him to stay at home at all times.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/lynch-tak...000000134.html
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Friday that she will take a step back from the decision whether to charge anyone in the Hillary Clinton private email server probe but is not fully recusing herself from the case.
Lynch told Washington Post journalist Jonathan Capehart in an interview at the Aspen Ideas Festival that she will accept whatever recommendations the FBI and career prosecutors make. (Career prosecutors are Justice Department lawyers who were not appointed by the president.)
“I will be briefed on it and I will be accepting their recommendations,” Lynch said. She added that the team of FBI investigators and career prosecutors on the case has been working “independently” since before she took office last year.
The announcement comes after Republicans and some Democrats criticized Lynch for a half-hour meeting on Monday with former President Bill Clinton. Those critics said the meeting suggested a conflict of interest.
“What on earth were you thinking?” Capehart asked Lynch of her meeting with the former president.
Lynch said the meeting at the Phoenix airport was primarily social and that the email inquiry was not discussed. She said they talked about Clinton’s grandchildren. “I certainly wouldn’t do it again, because I think it has cast a shadow over what it should not, over what it will not touch,” Lynch said, adding that the questions over the Justice Department’s integrity have been “painful.”
The FBI is investigating whether Hillary Clinton or others mishandled classified information by using a private email server for official business while she was secretary of state. Investigators have not interviewed Clinton in the probe.
Some Republicans have called on Lynch to completely recuse herself from the inquiry and appoint a special prosecutor to handle it, arguing that a Democratic appointee cannot fairly head an investigation that potentially has a big influence on the presidential election.
This step falls short of that. “A recusal would mean I wouldn’t even be briefed on what the findings were,” Lynch said. “While I don’t have a role in those findings or coming up with those findings … I will be briefed on it and I will be accepting their recommendations.”
The step does mean, however, that Lynch is promising she would not change the outcome of the investigation or attempt to downgrade the recommendations, which attorneys general have done in the past. (Former Attorney General Eric Holder, for example, downgraded the recommended charge for Gen. David Petraeus’ mishandling of classified information to a misdemeanor.)
Lynch said she has long planned to defer to the recommendations of the FBI and career prosecutors but decided she should take the unusual step of announcing the decision to clear up doubts over a conflict of interest.
A Justice Department official declined to comment on whether other political appointees, such as Assistant Attorney General John Carlin, would also take a step back from the case.
Tsa u need to format your walls of text better tbh
the browser I have to use a work doesn't work well with this site, copy pasting formats like that every time unless I manually go through and space it myself. typing alone is a pain in the ass, if I type to fast it can't keep up. so no, I won't be formatting
Just add spacing after paragraphs. Otherwise your article spamming is just as useless as bouts'
Potential hard on for TheSanityAnnex happening as I type this. Comey speaking about the email case.
No indictment forthcoming.
I break up original paragraphs into single lines here to illustrate points, and/or highlight them so you TL;DNR rightwingnuts don't have to read blocks of text to see how ed up your politicians are.
"Last night, avid Trump supporter and West Virginia Republican State Rep. Michael Folk called for Hillary Clinton to be hanged on the National Mall."
https://www.facebook.com/KeepAmericaGreatPAC/?fref=nf
The myth of the Democratic rift: Despite media hot air, the data show Sanders supporters will embrace Clinton
Hot takes might suggest otherwise, but the truth is, the Democratic Party is quite unified
more data-driven approaches often fail to support these narratives. Data don’t show widespread misogynistic at udes among Bernie Sanders supporters, nor do they suggest widespread racial resentment or stereotyping. Moreover, I find that there are strong reasons to believe Sanders supporters will ultimately reject Trump, and most will end up supporting Clinton.
Democrats Are More United Now Than in 2008
By historical standards, the primary was not extraordinarily bitter. Sanders refused to go after Clinton on potential scandals (such the e-mail scandal, which he publicly denounced) and rather ran a campaign to push the Democratic party to the left on issues with broad popular support.
Indeed, Sander’s endorsement signals a level of party unity that has occasionally evaded Democrats. In 1992, Jerry Brown called Bill Clinton the “prince of sleaze” and refused to endorse Clinton, even after clearly losing the primary. In 1972 the party was openly divided about McGovern, and he ended up being crushed. Though it has quickly slipped into the memory hole, the 2008 primary was quite vicious, and many Hillary supporters refused to support Obama in the general.
Indeed, the relatively low levels of support among Bernie supporters for Trump signal far more party unity among Democrats than existed in the past.
Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study 2008, I find that 24 percent of those who reported voting for Hillary in the Democratic primary supported McCain in the general (74 percent supported Obama).
According to polls from Washington Post-ABC News, in May, 20% of those who backed Bernie in the primary would support Trump in the general. By June, that number had fallen to only 8%.
For comparison, in June of 2008, 20% of those who supported Clinton in the primary said they preferred McCain over Obama in the general.
http://www.salon.com/2016/07/17/the_...brace_clinton/
Bull corporate Christian misogyny
‘Someday a woman will be president’ T-shirts banned by Walmart in 1995 for offending ‘family values’
In August 1995, a Wal-Mart store in Florida sold T-shirts showing Margaret, a character in the comic strip “Dennis the Menace,” proclaiming that “Someday a woman will be president.”
A customer spotted the T-shirts and complained, reported The Associated Press, and the store removed them.
“It was determined the T-shirt was offensive to some people and so the decision was made to pull it from the sales floor,” said Jane Bockholt, a spokeswoman for the company at the time.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/some...e+Raw+Story%29
WM lets one complaint about a t-shirt make corporate policy, but complaints about WM's poverty wages, "offensive" to Ms of people, get no action.
1995 whine lol
Meet The Press Allows Trump Surrogate To Lie, But Questions Clinton’s Trustworthiness
Here's an example of the kind of belabored false equivalency and double standard that is pushed by Republicans and the media about Hillary Clinton's trustworthiness problem.
This is just one example from one show, but this narrative is being beaten to death across the mainstream media and by Republicans.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/...iticus+USA+%29
Wake me up when the head of the FBI calls Trump a liar.
head of the FBI is a life-long Repug, violated FBI protocol of remaining silent when there is no indictment, so he could slime Hillary before a national audience.
Did she lie to the public yes or no?
http://www.politico.com/blogs/james-...i-comey-225216
maybe so, I don't follow Repug witch hunts, and certainly don't take them as Bible truth as you do.
Has your lover boy Trash LIED, TO THE PUBLIC, 100s of times, espoused crazy-assed conspiracy bull for years and still does?
You posted more articles on her emails then every political forum poster combined, your claim you don't follow witch hunts is a straight lie, just like Clinton's lies to the public.
Its ok now TSA because RSS.
Mr. Trump has a lot of work to do once he becomes POTUS.
I don't believe witch hunts. I follow them to see what you assholes are taking as Bible truth.
Finally, the Repugs and FBI have NOTHING on Hillary. Repugs before her, Fed and state, have done MUCH WORSE with their emails.
Either Comey is lying or Hillary is lying. Who is lying?
During an extended exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Comey affirmed that the FBI's investigation found information marked classified on her server even after Clinton had said that she had neither sent nor received any items marked classified.
"That is not true," Comey said. "There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the do ents."
Asked whether Clinton's testimony that she did not email "any classified material to anyone on my email" and "there is no classified material" was true, Comey responded, "No, there was classified material emailed."
"Secretary Clinton said she used one device. Was that true?" Gowdy asked, to which Comey answered, "She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state."
Gowdy then asked whether it was true that Clinton, as she said, returned all work-related emails to the State Department.
"No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned," Comey said.
"Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account. Was that true?" Gowdy asked.
"That's a harder one to answer," Comey responded. "We found traces of work-related emails in, on devices or in slack space. Whether they were deleted or whether when a server changed out something happened to them, there is no doubt that the work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system."
Gowdy asked whether Clintons' lawyers read every one of her emails as she had said. Comey replied, "No."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/james-...#ixzz4GhYwJMuZ
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
