Reply With Quote
I agree, but that gets hard to do at times. I do attempt such things, and sometimes fail. I clearly see there are those who either cannot, or choose not to try to see past their bias.
Russia still though. Obama really pussed out against Putin and co. Not saying I even care about Ukraine at all. Just that every Russian dictator for 500 years plays the exact same play (look tough and suppress any domestic dissent) from the exact same playbook (we are too big and ty to occupy and if 10, 20, 30 million of our own ppl die in x war, well, wont be the first time).
Russia has never been ahead of the curve in any fashion. A large chunk of their 10k ty nukes probably would blow up before exiting the potato farm.
Last edited by z0sa; 12-10-2016 at 03:41 AM.
I agree, but that gets hard to do at times. I do attempt such things, and sometimes fail. I clearly see there are those who either cannot, or choose not to try to see past their bias.
"Obama really pussed out against Putin"
Macho man, what would you have done "against Putin" in Ukraine?
I guess you have manspreaded like Pootin? that's being real tough.
Do you know it was US/EU that got the Ukraine nazis to overthrow the Ukraine guy who was a Putin puppet? that the overthrow caused Pootin to push into Ukraine, take Crimea?
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/07/1...t-nuland-made/
Nuland is married to neocon extremist Kagan, who founded, with ALWAYS-WRONG Billy Kristol, neocon PNAC that lied USA into Iraq for oil?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-10-2016 at 09:28 AM.
I can answer that for you. no, he wouldn't.
And there are people on this site an elsewhere that would drop it if Hillary had won. The good thing is the intelligence agencies have not. This clearly needs to be looked into. This could be a major problem. It already has been with other countries (China, North Korea). We got goofball trumpets that want to look the other way.
So exactly how do you obtain information on events you are not there to witness?
THE MEDIA...
What fkn cowards way of giving up. How do you even know information was leaked...? THE MEDIA.
THE MEDIA, is the media that does not fit your worldview.
Once you realize that news outlets are profit driven businesses paid by click count you can understand that anything that creates sensationalism increases profit.
I've known that for decades. That's a primary reason why so many stories are a mix of fact and fiction.
I specifically said i dont care about Ukraine shillbot.
The Cold war coukd basically be described in 1 sentence as: JFK called Kruschev's bluff and the Soviet Union never found its balls again.
World War 2: 30 million dead, coldest winter in a century IE who cares hiw many serfs die, youll never occupy this arctic wasteland
WW1: Hindenburg calls Czar's bluff, Russian Empire never finds its balls again.
2010s: Obama sanctions Russian and Ukrainian serfs to no effect. Let's Russia intervene and dictate Syrian conflict. Hillary ing Clinton understands said playbook better than O in her call for no fly zone.
Trump's buddy buddy is more disturbing than anything; indeed, i find it more alarming than any other major issue how the roles of the 99% are increasingly service related. I see increasing ecomonic serfdom (of a 21st century variety) as the greatest and yet most invisible and least understood threat to Americans' futures.
Greenwald nails it as usual:
https://theintercept.com/2016/12/10/...-for-evidence/
Because the MSM has such a great track record
The click count concept only came about in the past decade.
We got a warhawk here. Lol
Fair elections seems a lost notion to resident right wingers.
Sorry, but the liberal media doesn't have any room to complain about another en y promoting one candidate over another. They've been in Hillary's pocket since day one and did all they could to trash Trump and get her elected. Now were supposed to listen to them complain about hacked emails, that may have been provided by Russians, were used to level the playing field a bit? Sorry, don't care. Absolutely zero s given.
Last edited by IceColdBrewski; 12-10-2016 at 12:41 PM.
With these kind of things, the details aren't worth following. When I need to do something, someone will make it apparent and then I'll think about it. Before then it's just corporate driven "yellow" journalism hoping to ensnare viewers.
Pla udes seem to be the only thing the left have these days.
DMC dodging the point with his typical facile deflections.
DMC -slapping butthurt liberals as usual.
CN on queue with his facile posturing.
gyBlumpkins digging through his thesaurus to properly express his butthurt.
Since when is it every media outlet's responsibility to equally promote 2 candidates? At what point is one candidate objectively a worse choice than the other, and if so, is it the responsibility of the media to ignore that?
"I'm okay with a hostile foreign government influencing* the election of a steaming turd because the liberal media favored the steaming turd's opponent."
That's kind of stupid, all due respect.
*allegedly
I would argue that the media's focus, whether intended or not, actually gave Trump a leg up. Most of their coverage was focused on whatever Trump said that offended their Manhattan-centric standards and other things that Middle America didn't ultimately care about.
I mean media profits. Sorry I didn't specify.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
