This is a waste of time unless someone has found flaws in the process and is trying to fix it for the next elections for that state.
...that's exactly what's been found, badly managed people, broken malfunctioning machines, etc w/o even getting into the counting fraud possible a the state-consolidation level.
Kock Bros, what's not to hate?
WI's elected Repug supreme court stopped the suit against Kockmonster Walker. Repugs states are ing cesspools of corruption.
Trump focused on swing states intensely. And California. Bunch of idiots who want to destroy this great country.
How to save the Wisconsin recount
The Wisconsin recount is headed for disaster, but there’s still a chance to save it. We need a federal lawsuit requiring a hand recount of all paper ballots.
We’re one week into the historic Wisconsin recount, prompted in no small part by widespread concerns about the reliability of electronic voting machines and their susceptibility to tampering, fraud, and computer hacking.
The difference in Wisconsin is currently about 22,000 votes, or 0.75%.
Patriotic, democracy-loving Americans share a common value of wanting to see that every vote is counted fairly, accurately, and honestly, especially in such a close and crucial election as this one.
Let’s get to know these machines better.
The optical scanning computers used in Wisconsin and other states, especially the infamous ES&S DS-200, too often fail to count votes where voter intent could be discerned by hand.
These are officially called “undervotes” or “overvotes,” but in many instances could be called “not counted votes.”
A lightly marked ballot filled out by an elderly or handicapped person, a checkmark instead of a filled-in oval, or even a ballot cast using the wrong pen color can be missed or “no votes” in a machine count but real, legal votes in a hand count.
In Florida, a shocking 1.67% of the people wearing an “I Voted” sticker didn’t actually.
In Michigan, where the margin is only 11,000 votes, there are 75,000 not counted votes in Detroit alone.
Hand counts will identify and include legal votes missed by the machine; anyone who says otherwise is simply wrong.
Back to Wisconsin.
The disparity between machine counting and hand counting is why the Stein and Clinton campaigns pe ioned last week for a judicial order that would require all counties to recount paper ballots by hand.
Last Tuesday, the judge affirmed that truth while denying the order.
Forty-seven of Wisconsin’s 72 counties chose the faster and more reliable method of hand counting the ballots.
But that means 25 counties are using the same unreliable machines for their recount as on election night.
The disparity in methods means that the machine-counted votes in those 25 counties are counted less than the hand-counted votes in the other 47.
This violates the Equal Protection Clause and was the central holding in Bush v. Gore, that similar ballots must be counted in the same way.
• In St. Croix County, recount observers discovered that tamper-protection seals on five voting machines used in the recount were broken. Officials later confirmed they were broken before Election Day as well. The same officials declined to conduct a hand count of all ballots and instead recounted ballots using those five machines.[/COLOR]
• In Waukesha, a county with a history of troubled elections, officials are failing to reconcile the poll list in each ward, counting votes where the voter’s signature is missing from the poll book, and allowing ballot remakes that can’t be matched to originals. In other words, Waukesha is counting ballots that shouldn’t be counted.[/COLOR]
• In Racine County, election officials are rejecting ballots by absentee/in-person voters whose ballot envelope does not contain a witness signature. Other counties are accepting identical ballots on the grounds that such voters have been witnessed by election officials. This disparate practice is also a violation of Wisconsin law and the Equal Protection Clause.[/COLOR]
• The DS-200s create digital ballot images when they scan each ballot — images that are public records. Since it’s the scanned ballot images rather than the paper ballot itself that these machines are counting, to destroy the image is to destroy the chain of custody. That’s exactly what officials in Brown County are doing. Officials in Fond Du Lac County are refusing to make the images available to observers to compare to the machine totals.
• And yes, despite FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to Congress on September 28th, many of Wisconsin’s (and America’s) voting machines are connected to the Internet.
The ES&S DS-200, in use in 15 Wisconsin counties, comes installed with a cellular modem to transmit results via the Internet on election night. Election observers in Wisconsin have confirmed that several counties, including the large counties of Milwaukee and Waukesha, use this capability. This also requires that the central county tabulator, which receives the transmitted results, is on the Internet, too.
We suspect this is not an intermittent connection but that the county server is connected for longer periods, including during pre-election testing
This opens up all the nightmare scenarios for tampering and hacking in our elections that computer scientists have warned us about.
Against an adversary with nation-state cyber warfare capabilities, all bets are off.
https://medium.com/@ChrisSautter/how...ca5#.6wx2a4agi
Quit being a little . If she won you would be 100% against any recounts
Hillary DID WIN the popular vote.
And I bet that MI and WI Repugs, maybe with help from Russians cracking the online voting machines, RAPED the vote count.
Combined with MI and WI both having suppressed non-white voters, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, Presidency stolen.
Nice evidence you've presented there for all those claims got
and as far as popular vote goes, its meaningless and had trump won the popular vote but lost the electoral college you would also be gloating and saying too bad
Batching Boo cry his ass off is ing hilarious.
you wannbe macho assholes REALLY REALLY hate any pushback,
y'all sound like less prickly fragile Don The Con on twitter.
you wannbe macho assholes REALLY REALLY hate any pushback,
y'all sound like less prickly fragile Don The Con on twitter.
Will Boutons ever get over this? Lol
Totally unhinged.
you're a post election tourist...
But you should know better. The general content and tone of boutons' posts haven't changed since the election.Totally unhinged.
lol you considering yourself a veteran of the political forum but don't know the difference between qualifications and approval.
You're an election tourist too.
says the gnsf
If I graphed your post count in the political forum it would look like a hockey stick heading up to the election.
Case and point.
You're still using this shtick like it means anything. Loser through and through.
shadowflames shadowflaming
DMC, looks like I got you sprung. got.
Landslide Lie Debunked: Trump Got .35% More Popular Vote Than 1988 Loser Michael Dukakis
Conservative CNN contributor and senior editor at The Atlantic David Frum reminded Trump and his supporters that actually, in spite of their claims to have a mandate,
the people "didn't speak" because "Donald Trump won 0.35 points more of the popular vote than Michael Dukakis in 1988."
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/...iticus+USA+%29
Shadowflame Talent
40 yd range
Instant 14 sec recharge
2 Charges
Requires Warlock (Demonology)
Requires level 15
Lobs a ball of Shadowflame at the target, dealing (110% of Spell power) Shadowflame damage immediately, and another (154% of Spell power) Shadowflame damage over 8 sec, stacking up to 3 times.
Generates 1 Soul Shard.
Thinking doing a google search for shadowflames points to me. Your gity ass really miss the mark there.
Try bing next.
IN ONE COUNTY, 4,000 PEOPLE SHOWED UP TO VOTE BUT DIDN’T — OR DID THEY?
More than 4,000 voters in a single Pennsylvania county headed to their local polling places on Election Day, stepped into the booth and, at the moment of decision, seemingly cast their vote for no one, records show.
Not for President-elect Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton. Not for Gary Johnson nor Jill Stein.
Nor did they pick a single candidate for US Senate, Congress, state attorney general, state legislature, or town supervisor.
Yet machine records confirm that these Montgomery County voters went to the trouble of showing up.
They then either decided to withhold their vote or something prevented their votes from being recorded.
This mountain of so-called No Votes, regarded as “implausible” by Stein’s legal team, is now at the heart of her appeal for a recount of Pennsylvania’s presidential race that awarded the state’s 20 delegates to Trump.
http://whowhatwhy.org/2016/12/11/one...ed-vote-didnt/
yet another state run by Repugs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote