Reply With Quote
Your candidate used an insecure server.
That was the point I was making about you. You didn't add anything because you didn't actually make a point. When asked to clarify and repair your circular reasoning, you chose neutral ground and instead challenged me to disprove something you weren't even committed to stating in the first place. That's chicken , Philo.
Your candidate used an insecure server.
Your candidate IS insecure, which is far more dangerous.
I dont have to make the claim that only conservatives to do something to make a point.
I don't have a candidate. I have a POTUS.Your candidate IS insecure, which is far more dangerous.
No one can force you to, that's true. You are free to chicken your way around to your heart's content.
Trump’s Proposed Changes To White House Press Corps Would Undermine The Flow Of Information
Members of the incoming Trump administration are floating ideas that would radically bring changes to the White House Press Corps.
All of the suggested changes would benefit Trump by
allowing the White House to intimidate journalists into compliance while restricting the free flow of information from the White House to the American people.
The changes that have been suggested have included
doing away with the White House daily press briefing,
getting rid of the president’s weekly address, and
perhaps moving the White House press corps out of the White House.
All of these potential changes are designed to accomplish two goals.
The Trump administration wants a compliant press that fits in with
Trump’s belief that the media should be nothing more than glorified transcription praise machines.
Trump has been avoiding the press for nearly seven months. This is not an administration that is going to engage and answer questions from the political press. By limiting entry to the White House, Trump is going to force journalists to trade objective coverage for access. In other words,
the president-elect wants to transform our free press into state-run media.
The second goal behind the potential changes is to limit the amount of information coming out of the White House to the public.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/15/trump-benefits-changing-white-house-press-corps.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&u tm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politic us+USA+%29
Trash already punished WaPo by denying press credentials, and punished Twitter from coming to his big gold penis tower for denying Trash the #CrookedHillary hashtag.
Rick Perry is paid by company attempting to build the Dakota Access Pipeline
pick to run the Energy Department also happens to be the favorite politician of the company attempting to build the Dakota Access Pipeline.
For the past two years, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry has held a paid position on the board of directors of Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the controversial project.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/rick-perry-is-paid-by-energy-transfer-partners/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
Trump’s Latest National Security Pick Once Implied Obama Lied About Being Black
While guest-hosting for Laura Inghram’s radio show in 2008, Fox News’ Monica Crowley said the following of Obama:Crowley was referring to a genealogy posted by a blogger claiming Obama’s ancestry was more Arabic than African. The blogger offered no root research for his claims, instead encouraging readers to “[r]esearch the Kenyan records for yourself.”
Now, he was not born in Africa, but the father was from Kenya, the father was from Africa.?
And according to this genealogy — and again, because I haven’t done the research, I can’t verify this — but according to this guy Kenneth Lamb, Barack Obama is not black African, he is Arab African.
And yet, this guy is campaigning as black and painting anybody who dares to criticize him as a racist.
I mean, that is — it is the biggest con I think I’ve ever seen.
Crowley was also a supporter of Trump’s “birther” movement, which claimed that Obama was not born in America, and therefore was ineligible to be President.
She’s defended the movement in the past, saying on Bill O’Reilly’s show that “Issues about (Obama’s) Origins have traction…” because he does “Un-American” things which show the American people that “Bottom line: he’s not one of us.”
Even O’Reilly responded to this with “I wouldn’t go that far.”
http://usuncut.com/news/trumps-lates...ma-lied-black/
Fox LIED for Trash hard, and gets rewarded with many Fox people and contributors into Trash's pile.
robinlopez.gif
LOL at OBJECTIVE COVERAGE - you're not seriously suggesting that comes out of the press especially regarding Trump? After the way they've treated him, I'm all for moving the White House press corp out of the White House (pay for your own accommodations) and do they also fly around with him on Air Force One? - pay for your own flight. Who believes anything or any poll they put out anyways?
Doesn't necessarily mean that any flow of information would be restricted. WH could do daily releases via internet. Trump can speak directly to the American public with his videos and (vetted) tweeting - even more frequently than weekly.
Your lack of interest in accountability for the most powerful office in the country is seriously disturbing.
At what point is the President of the United States too coddled for your tastes?
Too coodled? You think the media has coddled Trump?
Maybe some should get used to things being done differently. I find it a refreshing CHANGE - you know, what a lot of voters wanted.
lesS ignorant Trash is afraid of taking questions from a hostile informed press
No, perhaps I should type more slowly. You're coddling the President by shielding him from themean press
If the change you wanted was for the President of the United States to not have to face direct challenges to his policy by a Free Press, then I hope to God you never vote again.Maybe some should get used to things being done differently. I find it a refreshing CHANGE - you know, what a lot of voters wanted.
mean - sureNo, perhaps I should type more slowly. You're coddling the President by shielding him from the
If the change you wanted was for the President of the United States to not have to face direct challenges to his policy by a Free Press, then I hope to God you never vote again.
Free - dunno about that
working for the American Public to have objective coverage - certainly not
What is unobjective about asking the President's Press Secretary questions and having them answered? Why does Donald Trump deserve to avoid questioning? Do you think he can't handle it?
The guy you're so excited about being President sounds like a pussy to me. This is the guy you want talking to foreign leaders? Is he going to start avoiding those conversations when they make him uncomfortable too?
Seriously, never vote again.
The press does not provide objective coverage of Trump. He has not avoided questioning - see this past 18 months of being interviewed by numerous networks (unlike Hillary) and obviously he handled it - DESPITE, the media's bias, he got elected.
Please see other thread about Canadian independent journalist. What do you think about her report/video? Is the corporate media telling us all a bunch of lies? And if so, does Obama know what's going on over there?
Sorry to disappoint, but I'll be voting again and again ...
No you won't. When trump lets you down, you'll go right back to whatever you were doing before you wandered aimlessly down to the PF.
Oh My ... Trump's Commerce Nominee Backed 47%
Wilbur Ross, Donald Trump's nominee for Commerce Secretary, backed up Mitt Romney's "47%" comments back late in the 2012 campaign in an interview on Indian TV station NDTV.
Ross makes the factually incorrect statement that 47% of Americans pay no taxes.
Actually more telling than that are the comments about scofflaws on unemployment and various safety net programs.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/oh-my-trump-s-commerce-nominee-backed-47?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campa ign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29
Just amazing.
And Trash and his team are gonna WIN for the white working class, with 10Ms on public assistance?
Trash and his whole team are one big stinkin pile of billionaire .
Trump is going to be mad when he hears what his appointees think about the TPP
His top economic and foreign policy advisers love it (as do his other advisers).
http://www.vox.com/2016/12/16/139387...mp-cabinet-tpp
Trash is such a lying bul ter.
Making up campaign to sucker and con you assholes is tons easier (talk is CHEAP, like Trash) than being forced into doing what the corporatocracy has pays for.
Every ing tweet, campaign LIE will be ignored in practice.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-16-2016 at 08:57 AM.
The Worst of the Worst
David Friedman, Donald Trump's nominee to be the next US Ambassador to Israel, described in the mainstream press as a supporter of settlement expansion
Chemi Shalev captures the essence here.
By Israeli standards, Donald Trump’s designated Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, is an extreme right-winger.
He might find a place in the settler movement or with Naftali Bennett’s Habayit Hayehudi Party, but only on its right-wing fringes.
He makes Benjamin Netanyahu seem like a left-wing defeatist.
From where Friedman stands, most Israelis, never mind most American Jews, are more or less traitors.
Friedman has repeatedly attacked J Street, the pro-Israel, pro-Peace group, and its members as worse than the Jewish collaborators who served the Nazis during the Holocaust.
On the one hand, it's too hard for me to get too upset about the appointment of any Ambassador since Ambassadors don't make national policy. Anything they do of consequence only has lasting meaning because they are backed by the US government.
But this suggests
US policy in the Middle East will be guided by some mix of Adelson, Trump's impulsiveness and perhaps most critically Trump/Kushner clan politics.
So it is as bad as it gets but mainly because Trump policy will be as bad as it gets.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/...+%28TPMNews%29
Milton Friedman's son.
Sen. Jeff Sessions Faces Fight Over Bid to Be Trump's Attorney General
The battle over President-elect Donald Trump's attorney general nominee, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, is heating up ahead of what promises to be a deeply contested confirmation hearing next year.
Groups on the left are ratcheting up their criticism of Sessions on issues such as immigration, criminal justice and voting rights while those supporting him are unveiling the first component of what is expected to be a vigorous campaign in his favor.
His confirmation hearings are scheduled for January 10 and 11 before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-jeff-sessions-faces-fight-over-bid-be-trumps-attorney-n696631
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions