Reply With Quote
Yep.
He has neither the evidence, or the balls.
That's why Hillary is scary. She might actually start WWIII with Russia, and cream her panties over it.
He isnt going to do anything. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. It would need evidence and backbone and he has neither. Just an unending supply of sour grapes.
Yep.
He has neither the evidence, or the balls.
That's why Hillary is scary. She might actually start WWIII with Russia, and cream her panties over it.
Chooch
The FBI spent tons of resources investigating Hillary's emails, and then Comey s her over twice.
Pootin cracking the US election? FBI yawns.
this one nasty , typical of you Trash and Pootin fellators
Trump spokeswoman says ignoring Russian espionage is patriotic
Trump himself also suggests hacking is okay because it reveal juicy information about the Democratic primary.
Kellyanne Conway blasted White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest for his Thursday comments. Earnest had mentioned that, at Trump’s most recent press conference in July, then-candidate Trump had publicly asked Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails and release them.
Asked by host Martha MacCallum whether President Obama could muzzle Earnest, Conway called on him and Hillary Clinton to “shut down” questions about Russia’s role in Trump’s surprise victory.
“If you want to shut this down and love the country enough to have the peaceful transition in great democracy between the Obama administration and the Trump administration,”
she said, “there are a couple people in prominent positions, one named Hillary Clinton and Obama, since people want to fight for her election, they can shut this down.”
Trump himself, per usual, took to Twitter on Friday morning to minimize the importance of the topic,
arguing the ends justify the means and falsely claiming that the DNC acted illegally.
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?
Conway also argued that the Russian hacking can’t have been important because it was not the main focus of the Clinton campaign prior to Election Day, as “ Beyonce and Jay-Z” didn’t “warn everybody about the Russian hacking interference.”
A day early Trump falsely claimed the Clinton campaign had not raised the issue at all until after the election.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-spok...793#.v7j4hvqb8
Trump has been lying about the Russian hack. He just accidentally admitted it himself.
As Trump tweeted Thursday: “If Russia, or some other en y, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?”
This is not some small offhand remark. It represents an effort by Trump — one that is going to continue — to construct an alternative narrative to replace the increasingly substantiated one in which Russia may have in fact tried to interfere in our election to help him, which would obviously carry enormous significance on many levels.
But Friday, Trump send out a new tweet that accidentally reveals that he knows this entire narrative is a lie:
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?
5:09 AM - 16 Dec 2016
Trump is referring here to news that broke in late October:
That a hacked email showed that interim DNC chair Donna Brazile may have leaked a Democratic primary debate question to Clinton’s campaign in advance.
Brazile publicly blamed this leak on Russian hackers who were out to divide Democrats by feeding the perception among Bernie Sanders supporters that the DNC was putting its thumb on the scales for her.
This built on a
formal statement that the intelligence community put out earlier in October declaring itself “confident” that Russia was trying to interfere in the elections by hacking into DNC emails.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...t-draw7&wpmm=1
That Assange fellow claims it wasn't the Russians.Trump has been lying about the Russian hack. He just accidentally admitted it himself.
As Trump tweeted Thursday: “If Russia, or some other en y, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?”
This is not some small offhand remark. It represents an effort by Trump — one that is going to continue — to construct an alternative narrative to replace the increasingly substantiated one in which Russia may have in fact tried to interfere in our election to help him, which would obviously carry enormous significance on many levels.
But Friday, Trump send out a new tweet that accidentally reveals that he knows this entire narrative is a lie:
✔@realDonaldTrump
Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?
5:09 AM - 16 Dec 2016
Trump is referring here to news that broke in late October:
That a hacked email showed that interim DNC chair Donna Brazile may have leaked a Democratic primary debate question to Clinton’s campaign in advance.
Brazile publicly blamed this leak on Russian hackers who were out to divide Democrats by feeding the perception among Bernie Sanders supporters that the DNC was putting its thumb on the scales for her.
This built on a
formal statement that the intelligence community put out earlier in October declaring itself “confident” that Russia was trying to interfere in the elections by hacking into DNC emails.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...t-draw7&wpmm=1
What pseudo psychology, dim? What disorder or behavioral psychology terms did I use? All I get from this is your ignorance.
And not posting everyday because I have things other to do than off at work and home doesn't make it hiding.
It will be a first if you were to address what he says directly and on merit rather than the these lame deflections.
The OP is a nonpartisan source that describes Russia's methods and efficacy empirically using several examples of other countries and specific tactics.
That is not substance yet you and your ilk's constant ad hominems, memes, and/or emotional characterizations is valid? It's typical cowardice but I don't think even you are so stupid to think what you claim is valid.
Don The Con Trash says he respects Pootin, why? where did that come from?
Trash and Repugs prefer a murderous, $200B-corrupt dictator to USA's own knitter?
And millions of rightwing racists, rednecks, KKK, ignorant Repug sheeple fall in line, loving Pootin!
How The Right-Wing Media Helped Trump Voters Warm Up To Putin
Putin is an authoritarian “strongman” who has
cracked down in Russia on freedom of speech and freedom of the press,
signed into law draconian anti-gay legislation, and
invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula, part of Ukraine.
Nevertheless, for years, right-wing media have praised Vladimir Putin as a greatleader, comparing him favorably against Obama. (aka the Muslim knitter)
Fox figures have consistently lauded the Russian autocrat as “a real he-man” and have claimed that Putin has “come to the diplomatic rescue” of President Obama.
One Fox host even went so far as to proclaim that she would like Putin to be president of the United States “for 48 hours,” so he could fight ISIS.
In 2014, conservative commentator
Pat Buchanan suggested that Putin is “one of us” and applauded him for “planting Russia’s flag firmly on the side of traditional Christianity”
with his policies against reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights — evidence, Buchanan suggested, that God is on Putin’s side in his clash with the West.
Even conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh once admitted that Putin was “saying things I agree with” when the Russian president announced that he “opposed the adoption of Russian orphans by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender foreign couples.”
Trash voters .... voted for a candidate in Trump
who is openly sympathetic to the autocrat and even
invited his government to hack personal emails from Trump’s Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.
According to the poll, 35 percent of Trump voters and 37 percent of registered Republicans now hold a “favorable” view of Putin.
even though the U.S. intelligence community has stated that its members are “confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and ins utions, including from US political organizations,”
some right-wing media are siding with Putin and downplaying the severity of the hacks.
(he's talkin about y'all racist Spurstalkers!)
Security experts have characterized the Russian interference in the 2016 election as “Watergate 2.0” and “a concern to all those who share democratic values,”
but the president-elect, who has consistently been enabled by those same conservative media figures, insists the claims of Russian interference are “just another excuse” and that he does not “believe it.”
It seems, that right-wing media will follow Trump’s lead and continue to use Putin’s personality to advance partisan goals over the national security of the United States.
http://www.nationalmemo.com/right-wi...-voters-putin/
Your Trash fellators have been, are, and will be conned and suckered by Trash.
And you pride yourselves on your "USA Yeah" patriotism, while fellatin Pootin.
Except Russia didn't do it. And Obama is so bent out of shape about the election results, he may just start WWIII.
No politico is not an unbiased source, their stuff reads like satire, feels like I am reading the onion. And even if they were objective, and they're not, they still offer no ing proof of their claims. If there were real proof of Russia hacking our election it would be tied up in court right now and you know it. Putin is just taunting obama his whipping boy, telling him to prove it. I issue the same challenge to the OP
Tied up in court under what law? Be specific.
And what basis do you have for Politico being partisan? I guess in your world the National Review is nonpartisan.
And of course you would take the Russian dictators word.
This is asinine. I can understand that some third party could have done it and made it to look like Russia or other possible scenarios but to ignore the issue and what they have done with other elections out of hand is just partisan nonsense.
Lol, being dumb enough to get phished.
Barry should have warned this Repug operative after he trashed Hillary the first time,
then gone "crazy pissed-off knitter" and fired him the morning after he trashed Hillary the 2nd time
Report: James Comey Now Agrees With CIA, Russia Interfered to Help Trump
A new report claims that FBI Director James Comey is now on board with the CIA’s assessment that Russia interfered with the US Presidential election to, in part, help President-elect Donald Trump win.
In a new report, The Washington Post quoted an internal memo from CIA director John Brennan to his subordinates, in which Brennan told the agency’s workforce that Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have come around to the CIA’s assessment after meeting several days ago.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” Brennan said.
“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI.”
According to the report, Russia did not have a “single purpose” for intervening in the election.
But CIA briefers told key Senators that it’s now “quite clear” that Russia interfered with the intent of helping Donald Trump win the White House.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/repor...to-help-trump/
James Comey needs to go to . Letting off Hillary is one thing. This takes it to another level of dishonesty.
Obama: 'We handled it the way it should have been handled’
WASHINGTON — President Obama said Friday that successor Donald Trump and other Republicans should join him in pushing back at Russian interference in the recent presidential election.
"The Russians were responsible for hacking" the Democratic National Committee, Obama said during a White House news conference, and confronting them over it should be a "bipartisan" concern.
Obama suggested he would retaliate against the Russians over the hack, but did not say specifically how. The president said he personally told Russian counterpart Vladmir Putin to stop the hacking, and that there would be "consequences" for such actions.
In some cases, he said, "the message will be directly received by the Russians and not publicized."
Under criticism from some Democrats for not acting before the Nov. 8 election day, Obama told reporters he held off talking much about the hack attack back then because people in a "hyper partisan" atmosphere would accuse him of trying to influence the vote. "It would have just become one more political scrum," he said.
At the White House, Obama declined to say where he thought Russian cyber espionage cost Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton the election, though he did assail the "troubling" news coverage of her candidacy -- particularly the hacked message as disclosed by Wikileaks.
Citing one example, he mocked the media for reporting on the leaked risotto recipe of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta
-- Declined to give his views on the decision by FBI Director James Comey to disclose new developments in the Clinton private e-mail investigation just days before the election; Clinton aides have also blamed Comey for the Democratic candidate's surprising election loss
-- Declared Thursday -- the deadline for signing up for coverage under the Obama health care law -- as the biggest day in Obamacare history, with more than 670,000 people signing up for coverage.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...king/95515212/
Obama sure tapped danced around that question. He wouldn't answer yes if it was 100% Russia.
barry went IN!! i'm probably one of his biggest critics here but he brought the ether. called russia a small little country that doesn't produce anything...basically called them the dollar general of the world lol. i will say i'm going to miss having an articulate, calculated president.
he was right about these fake patriots too. its embarrassing to see so many "patriots" sucking off russia right now
the same people with american flags in their yards and screaming MAGA are on their knees living the cuck life right now.
I'll boil it down for ya, sweetheart:::
barry went IN!! i'm probably one of his biggest critics here but he brought the ether. called russia a small little country that doesn't produce anything...basically called them the dollar general of the world lol. i will say i'm going to miss having an articulate, calculated president.
he was right about these fake patriots too. its embarrassing to see so many "patriots" sucking off russia right now
the same people with american flags in their yards and screaming MAGA are on their knees living the cuck life right now.
Trump: 1
Hillary: O
They are just a big ole petroleum producer. With our help.
barry went IN!! i'm probably one of his biggest critics here but he brought the ether. called russia a small little country that doesn't produce anything...basically called them the dollar general of the world lol. i will say i'm going to miss having an articulate, calculated president.
he was right about these fake patriots too. its embarrassing to see so many "patriots" sucking off russia right now
the same people with american flags in their yards and screaming MAGA are on their knees living the cuck life right now.
This is a country of vast mineral wealth and farmland that has never been able to break out of a sustained economic cancer. The inefficiency and corruption are so firmly established I don't really know what they can do except possibly break into more pieces that have some autonomy. But that produces nuke problems.
And Boots thinks the US is Fd...
Has absolutely zero meaning.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
