Reply With Quote
I assumed you wanted him fired for how he handled the Clinton emails.
Yet to be answered, is this the code name level classified intel everyone is freaking out about?
I assumed you wanted him fired for how he handled the Clinton emails.
hmm....whatdoyaknow, almost forgot about the intel dump to russia.
The only people that have declined to testify have been Susan Rice and James Comey. Think about it.This is why you don't with the intelligence agencies. You knew Comey's buddies weren't going to sit by and let their boy go out like that. If this all goes down and Comey does testify...
Comey doesn't want to testify behind closed doors. He wants it public. Think about that.
Even better in public. What's Susan Rice's excuse?
What other option does he have if his campaign was colluding with Russia?This is why you don't with the intelligence agencies. You knew Comey's buddies weren't going to sit by and let their boy go out like that. If this all goes down and Comey does testify...
yeah thats his point re
(a) you told bb that comey was fired for the same reason bb wanted him fired
(b) you thought bb wanted him fired for how he handled the clinton emails
(c) therefore, you told bb that comey was fired for how he handled the clinton emails
and then on the previous page of the thread, you claimed you never said (c)
She has better to do.
And now McMaster falls in line with the Non denial of the WaPo article
By late Tuesday morning, McMaster was calling the “premise” of the article false, but he refused to deny that Trump had shared classified information and only said that "we don’t say what’s classified, what’s not classified.”
Because they don't know? WTF?
And What was talked about in the meeting was "appropriate"? appropriate? What a stunning denial! Of course it was appropriate. They were sharing information on ISIS.
We are now only worried that people in the NSA went ape when he spilled the beans.
Fox going in raw on our Dear Leader
I was in the room, it didn't happen *drops mic*
WaPo and you suckers
My assumption (b) was incorrect. Do you have a point?
your assumption of what bb wanted was wrong
but you still actually asserted that comey was fired for how he handled clinton emails
Now it's " we don't determine what's classified and what's not"
This is such a clusterfck.
oh he's a anywayFox going in raw on our Dear Leader
clambake going in raw
My initial incorrect assumption makes the rest null and void. You're going to be a terrible lawyer.your assumption of what bb wanted was wrong
but you still actually asserted that comey was fired for how he handled clinton emails
We will continue to have News days like this because we have a totally disingenuous WH that has weaved multiple tangled webs and The Donald cannot admit he is wrong. The fires will continue from multiple sources and they won't just confess on the most minor of issues so that a new hot spot arises from every possible area.
The press basically said after Trump was elected this would be a leak fest because he can't let anything go. More astounding, The Donald can't distinguish really serious issues from minor ones. We still have 3 million illegal voters for Hillary just waiting for the next election.
Looks like I'll need to stop making assumptions.
Is the hoopla over Trump discussing ISIS using laptops for bombs yes or no?
lawyer smack
you literally told bb that comey was fired for the reason bb wanted. whether or not bb actually wanted him to be fired over clinton, you were essentially telling him that comey was fired over clinton
It's a leak fest because the government lifers are kicking and screaming trying to maintain the status quo they've all been accustomed to.
oh i just said it so our political scholars chris and mavsfan1000 don't have to.
I assumed bb wanted Clinton fired over the emails. I said the reason given for Comey being fired was over the emails. Therefore I said I'd thought he'd gotten his wish.
you literally told bb that comey was fired for the reason bb wanted. whether or not bb actually wanted him to be fired over clinton, you were essentially telling him that comey was fired over clinton
I don't believe I've even given an opinion on why I thought Comey was fired. I think all I've said on it was I didn't care one way or another.
Best of luck on the bar
Hopefully there isn't a deductive reasoning section
or they're blown away by what they witness.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)
Posting Permissions
