Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 150
  1. #76
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    Seriously can't think of a team in NBA history that "punts" a season with a Top 3 player in the league being in their prime..I dunno how many times I have to say it but Kawhi only has a couple years left and truly contending is what he wants..until Kawhi is locked up long term..never get comfortable.

    Spurs are in a weird phase because the Big 3 era is supposed to be over but Kawhi changes things and you can't stop competing for a ring EVERY YEAR.
    Cannot waste Kawhi's prime if he could leave in two years. He probably stays, but can't bank on it.

    Not just that, but if there are 25 teams punting and 4 trying to compete with the Warriors, assets will be cheaper to come by as there won't be as much demand.

  2. #77
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    The Spurs need another superstar player to play with Kawhi. It's clear now that LMA is not that guy. He needs to be the 3rd best player. Maybe Paul George?

  3. #78
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    202
    If the Spurs are to go after a big free agent, I'd rather they go after Gordon Hayward; you'd get a strong wing-man for Kawhi in the prime of his career throughout the length of the contract who can handle the ball, shoot and guard multiple positions. Not to mention that he comes from the team who runs the most similar offense to San Antonio's in Utah, so the learning curve would theoretically be smaller.

    That being said, I wouldn't be mad if they obtained CP3. Both are really good options. And if they can't get either of those, then you can explore trades and rely on the growth of your young'uns and further familiarity with the system for a team with seven new players last year on a 60+ win team. A team could do worse.

  4. #79
    The OL' Perfessor wildbill2u's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    8,641
    It would be great to have Paul. What realistic path would bring him here?

    We get these threads from time to time that propose great moves that have no realistic chance of happening.

  5. #80
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    Cannot waste Kawhi's prime if he could leave in two years. He probably stays, but can't bank on it.

    Not just that, but if there are 25 teams punting and 4 trying to compete with the Warriors, assets will be cheaper to come by as there won't be as much demand.
    Leonard will not leave sa unless the spurs up the coaching search when poop leaves

  6. #81
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    5,568
    It would be great to have Paul. What realistic path would bring him here?

    We get these threads from time to time that propose great moves that have no realistic chance of happening.
    I want Pau gone, and if getting rid of him nets us an all star level player that much the better. His three point shot isn't enough for me to want to retain him at that price. If we can use Pau's contract to somehow net us CP3 or heck a Boogie (or even a longshot Paul George rental or Jimmy Butler). An All star level player that could be effective against the Dubs or Cavs added to the roster, since I don't think Pau is an all star player anymore and I know he isn't effective against the Dubs.

  7. #82
    what uganda do about it? Joseph Kony's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    7,551
    Spurs can theoretically add Paul and still have money in 2018 for another solid player. You people thinking spurs have a realistic shot to get any big name FA is ridiculous. So if Paul says yes spurs will do what it takes to make room. our depth. Spurs with Paul will attract some ring chasers and PATFO has proven they can plug players in year by year and make it work. And besides if spurs can make it happen they can at least compete with GS and all it takes is 1 injury to KD or Curry and spurs are easily in the finals. Bottom line if we can get Paul you do it. Anyone who disagrees is re ed tbh

  8. #83
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    5,568
    Livingston is a starter coming off the bench. He's really played well, has that short range jumper down to a science.
    actually if Paul is just using us as a stalking horse, I wouldn't mind going after Livingston at a moderate price. He has starters skills is a matchup nightmare and would only be a short term place holder for MVParker immediately and Dijon long term. I would prefer him to Hill and the other pg FA's not named CP3 and might come at a cheaper price (not much cheaper because then he would stay with the Dubs).

  9. #84
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    actually if Paul is just using us as a stalking horse, I wouldn't mind going after Livingston at a moderate price. He has starters skills is a matchup nightmare and would only be a short term place holder for MVParker immediately and Dijon long term. I would prefer him to Hill and the other pg FA's not named CP3 and might come at a cheaper price (not much cheaper because then he would stay with the Dubs).
    This has the double effect of also weakening GS - they can't replace him with anything more than the tiny room exception.

    Livingston has literally no shooting range - literally doesn't shoot beyond 18 feet. That works for GS but could create floor clogging issues with the Spurs.

  10. #85
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    682
    We don't have a realistic path. Might as well rebuild

  11. #86
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    649
    You could do a direct trade of Gasol + Draft picks for Paul George. It would be a one year "rental" but Gasol is good as gone anyay, costs the same amount, and the draft picks arent that big of a deal.

    If we landed CP3 you would have to strongly consider doing this.

  12. #87
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    It would be great to have Paul. What realistic path would bring him here?

    We get these threads from time to time that propose great moves that have no realistic chance of happening.
    Dumping Pau or Parker and then relinquishing Manu's hold would likely get you a lot of the way there.

    The issue is that getting someone to eat salary would require giving away talent. If the cost is Danny Green you are creating a gaping hole at the 2.

  13. #88
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    You could do a direct trade of Gasol + Draft picks for Paul George. It would be a one year "rental" but Gasol is good as gone anyay, costs the same amount, and the draft picks arent that big of a deal.

    If we landed CP3 you would have to strongly consider doing this.
    why would the Pacers do that?

  14. #89
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    1,029
    Wtf are you talking about. You dont need a pg at all to run the flex, you need guys to set screens. Spurs dont have anyone but lee.
    I agree about the screens, but a PG that can deliver the ball/hit OPEN shots is needed. Also a Big man who is decisive on the catch. Those two things are still needed after all the screening has been done to get them open. Take the time and watch how it was run with Jazz from the late 80s-the late 2000s.

  15. #90
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    why would the Pacers do that?
    Because PG is leaving for nothing. Lakers prob won't offer a first round pick since they can sign Pg for free in free agency.

    Getting a first round pick plus the same salary relief as PG leaving is better than nothing

  16. #91
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Because PG is leaving for nothing. Lakers prob won't offer a first round pick since they can sign Pg for free in free agency.

    Getting a first round pick plus the same salary relief as PG leaving is better than nothing
    You left out the Gasol part.

  17. #92
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    5,568
    I want to option Pau for either CP3, or Boogie more so than PG13 but barring those two not happening a year PG rental while hoping to convince him SA is the place to be wouldn't NE the worst outcome.

  18. #93
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    The Spurs are notorious for making do with what they can raise in their own garden and only bring in pieces. These big name free agents have never been part of the building process in San Antonio, and I don't know why Spurs fans suddenly think it should be or will be. If this were to happen, the Spurs would be just like other teams, with a group of guys who don't play well together, poor locker room chemistry and players throwing each other under the bus. What makes the Spurs good is that average players can become good players in San Antonio and get minutes whereas on other teams, your Simmons or Murray types will be pine riders or trade fodder for players with names even if they don't have any game. This is why I laugh when the Lakers talk about developing their young guys instead of bringing in a couple big names. That's not how they operate, but it is how the Spurs operate. Just the fact that the Celtics are ready to trade away the 1st overall pick is amazing and says they don't value the draft class enough to think it makes a difference for them. I cannot imagine the Spurs trading away a 1st overall pick.

  19. #94
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    The Spurs are notorious for making do with what they can raise in their own garden and only bring in pieces. These big name free agents have never been part of the building process in San Antonio, and I don't know why Spurs fans suddenly think it should be or will be. If this were to happen, the Spurs would be just like other teams, with a group of guys who don't play well together, poor locker room chemistry and players throwing each other under the bus. What makes the Spurs good is that average players can become good players in San Antonio and get minutes whereas on other teams, your Simmons or Murray types will be pine riders or trade fodder for players with names even if they don't have any game. This is why I laugh when the Lakers talk about developing their young guys instead of bringing in a couple big names. That's not how they operate, but it is how the Spurs operate. Just the fact that the Celtics are ready to trade away the 1st overall pick is amazing and says they don't value the draft class enough to think it makes a difference for them. I cannot imagine the Spurs trading away a 1st overall pick.
    That's a very good point, but unless they tank a season a d that can only happen if Kawhu gets injured their options in the draft are limited. Last 2 seasons they have made rubs at FA... (and tried to sign KD). Their core was too old to be sustainable around Kawhi and that have drafted roleplayers which is fine if they had that second star (which LMA hasn't played like this season). Anywys FA is the only way to add a real second banana.

    I am ready to see the young Spurs develop.

  20. #95
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    That's a very good point, but unless they tank a season a d that can only happen if Kawhu gets injured their options in the draft are limited. Last 2 seasons they have made rubs at FA... (and tried to sign KD). Their core was too old to be sustainable around Kawhi and that have drafted roleplayers which is fine if they had that second star (which LMA hasn't played like this season). Anywys FA is the only way to add a real second banana.

    I am ready to see the young Spurs develop.
    Oh they give a half hearted try at free agents but they don't run the franchise like they are freeing up cap space, that's for sure. You cannot have it both ways if you're not in LA, Miami or NY.

  21. #96
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    The Spurs are notorious for making do with what they can raise in their own garden and only bring in pieces. These big name free agents have never been part of the building process in San Antonio, and I don't know why Spurs fans suddenly think it should be or will be. If this were to happen, the Spurs would be just like other teams, with a group of guys who don't play well together, poor locker room chemistry and players throwing each other under the bus. What makes the Spurs good is that average players can become good players in San Antonio and get minutes whereas on other teams, your Simmons or Murray types will be pine riders or trade fodder for players with names even if they don't have any game. This is why I laugh when the Lakers talk about developing their young guys instead of bringing in a couple big names. That's not how they operate, but it is how the Spurs operate. Just the fact that the Celtics are ready to trade away the 1st overall pick is amazing and says they don't value the draft class enough to think it makes a difference for them. I cannot imagine the Spurs trading away a 1st overall pick.
    This is spot on, and only supported by the Spurs recent track record bringing in "stars" via free agency (Jefferson and LMA). It's hard to bring in a dude and expect them to adopt the Spurs "culture" when they've been used to doing thing their way. Paul George would be another in the mold of these past two "major FA" signings.

    I'm for a reload/rebuild year, and would welcome flipping some established pieces for picks or recent draftees. So long as the front office infrastructure remains, I dont think Kawahi is that big of a risk to leave as other here fear. He's not a mental midget.

  22. #97
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    This is spot on, and only supported by the Spurs recent track record bringing in "stars" via free agency (Jefferson and LMA). It's hard to bring in a dude and expect them to adopt the Spurs "culture" when they've been used to doing thing their way. Paul George would be another in the mold of these past two "major FA" signings.

    I'm for a reload/rebuild year, and would welcome flipping some established pieces for picks or recent draftees. So long as the front office infrastructure remains, I dont think Kawahi is that big of a risk to leave as other here fear. He's not a mental midget.
    If only but they can't compete for a championship while at teh same time flipping rotation players for development pieces... so they haven't gone this way either.

  23. #98
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    The Spurs are notorious for making do with what they can raise in their own garden and only bring in pieces. These big name free agents have never been part of the building process in San Antonio, and I don't know why Spurs fans suddenly think it should be or will be. If this were to happen, the Spurs would be just like other teams, with a group of guys who don't play well together, poor locker room chemistry and players throwing each other under the bus. What makes the Spurs good is that average players can become good players in San Antonio and get minutes whereas on other teams, your Simmons or Murray types will be pine riders or trade fodder for players with names even if they don't have any game. This is why I laugh when the Lakers talk about developing their young guys instead of bringing in a couple big names. That's not how they operate, but it is how the Spurs operate. Just the fact that the Celtics are ready to trade away the 1st overall pick is amazing and says they don't value the draft class enough to think it makes a difference for them. I cannot imagine the Spurs trading away a 1st overall pick.
    Maybe this philosophy worked for the last 20 years because of Tim Duncan being a top 10 GOAT player but it's not going to get the job done in today's NBA and the spurs would be foolish to think it will. As great as Kawhi is he has a long way to go before even sniffing Tim

  24. #99
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    And besides I would disagree anyway. Spurs courted Webber. Spurs were close to adding Jason Kidd. They also went after J. oneal. spurs added then-sought after free agent Finley. They traded for RJ to be a big 4. And they went after LMA and most recently KD. Spurs definitely try to go after big names when they can like any other team

  25. #100
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    And besides I would disagree anyway. Spurs courted Webber. Spurs were close to adding Jason Kidd. They also went after J. oneal. spurs added then-sought after free agent Finley. They traded for RJ to be a big 4. And they went after LMA and most recently KD. Spurs definitely try to go after big names when they can like any other team
    Yes. People forget how hard it is to get a high quality free agent in his prime. It's even tougher now. I don't see many moves by Spurs except to bring over a few overseas players, and those won't move the needle against GSW.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •