Reply With Quote
My prediction came true immediately.
It's not finished, and it's your timeline to correct.
Finish your timeline and I'll provide you my working theory. Any excuses from you now are deflections.
My prediction came true immediately.
Why do you refuse to correct your timeline?My prediction came true immediately.
It perfect.
Can't correct perfect.
Person A: here is my theory
Person B: your theory is wrong, you have to fix it
Person A: how is it wrong?
Person B: fix it and then i'll tell you
Like the claim I proved yesterday you like to ask and repeat the same questions ad nauseam? You're not very original.
Best thing now everyone can ask TSA what his theory be and he will say "But his timlin
Is a timeline a theory yes or no?
The only thing you proved yesterday was you didn't know the definition of the word repeat.
Are choosing option a?
Kind of like this..Best thing now everyone can ask TSA what his theory be and he will say "But his tim
Then when you prove your point to his satisfaction he tries to deflect with but..but I only did that to counter his point.
You broke him yesterday and at the same time he proved my point.
I've offered to give you my theory once you correct and finish your timeline. Why are you still refusing?Best thing now everyone can ask TSA what his theory be and he will say "But his tim
Again, this is how I deal with Chumpdumper.Kind of like this..
Then when you prove your point to his satisfaction he tries to deflect with but..but I only did that to counter his point.
You broke him yesterday and at the same time he proved my point.
And once again you've made it clear you won't be backing your claims up. I don't blame you, it didn't work out well the last time for you. You and I both know you would only find posts of me saying "should be" and not "will be"
A few days ago you didn't know who he was and you still did it. Take your ty excuse and sell it to someone else, got.
Point proven.
Point proven would be you actually showing me doing that before I knew it was Chumpdumper. You won't do that though because it didn't happen. You also won't back your other claims, as predicted.
not in the scientific sense. but in the colloquial sense, could be
Except you had such a hard on for Hillary going to jail that you actually did. You literally spent your days pedaling pending indictments are coming! indictements are coming every single day on here. That is undeniable. I'm not going to waste my time proving a positive.
In the trying to be witty sense it wasn't a theory either, it was simply Chumpdumper's timeline.
Except you had such a hard on for Hillary going to jail that you actually did. You literally spent your days pedaling pending indictments are coming! indictements are coming every single day on here. That is undeniable. I'm not going to waste my time proving a positive.
Wow didn't take you long to back away from all your other claims
You say its undeniable, I'm denying it, and you cower when asked to prove it
If I claimed Hillary was going to be indicted every single day that would be really easy to find.
Don't be a coward, back your claim up. I don't even care about the others you pussed out on.
Reck you have until Browder's testimony to redeem yourself.
I already did back my claim up. First you ask me to prove you dont ask the same questions. I did.Wow didn't take you long to back away from all your other claims
You say its undeniable, I'm denying it, and you cower when asked to prove it
If I claimed Hillary was going to be indicted every single day that would be really easy to find.
Don't be a coward, back your claim up. I don't even care about the others you pussed out on.
Then your sorry excuse was that you only did it because chump.
You're now moving the goalpost in asking me to prove something else.
When and if I do you'll just have another sorry excuse. You're a pussy that way.
It's times like this where I can't figure out if you have a learning disability or are just an amazing troll
I asked to back up the claims you just made tonight. You started making excuses so I asked you to just back the one Hillary claim.
Even if you do back up this claim you still might be beyond redeemable
FIND A QUOTE OF ME SAYING HILLARY WILL BE INDICTEDYou like to laugh at Djohns predictions that people are going down all the time but you're no better.
Your record is abysmal.
My timeline correct and perfect.
My description of your theory also correct and perfect.
You pass on opportunity to edit either, so both stand perfect and unaltered.
You are free to edit either or let stand forever in your eternal submission to me.
Choice yours.
here, maybe this makes you feel better
Person A: this is my timeline
Person B: your timeline is wrong
Person A: how?
Person B: fix it and then i'll tell you
For the fun of it, I did a quick search and went into the first results and what a surprise...
For context:
And a bonus one for the lulz.
You can just read the whole thing on that particular thread where TSA keeps pedaling links hoping and talking about the impeding indictments here:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...256863&page=14
So there you go guy. Proof that you pedaled/wanted/talked about her getting indicted.
Person A: this is my timeline
Person B: your timeline is wrong
Person A: how?
Person B: fix it by adding these two items
There are currently 18 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 18 guests)
Posting Permissions
