Reply With Quote
Are you calling God desperate?
Why is the time desperate?
Are you calling God desperate?
Unreal. Trump trying to obstruct justice again.
ing re .
Should've tried a cookie bouquet. Everyone loves cookie bouquets.
Unreal. Trump trying to obstruct justice again.
ing re .
"former federal prosecutors say there are no rules that would prevent a president from passing along messages to the special counsel through an attorney."
Unreal. Trump trying to obstruct justice again.
ing re .
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ler/547917001/
Unreal. Reck still doesn't understand what obstruction of justice means.
ing re .
If Bill Clinton had done this, Republicans would have themselves.
Unreal. Trump trying to obstruct justice again.
ing re .
ME ME ME!!1
...
Last edited by RandomGuy; 08-09-2017 at 11:37 AM. Reason: double post
Raiding the home of somebody who was just a volunteer to the campaign more than a year ago
So they are raiding Manaforts home?
Weren't they supposed to be looking into Clintons?
Semen shielder #1 here to serve and swallow."former federal prosecutors say there are no rules that would prevent a president from passing along messages to the special counsel through an attorney."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ler/547917001/
Unreal. Reck still doesn't understand what obstruction of justice means.
ing re .
I can find you another "expert" who says otherwise, you cuck.
Let him keep sending love letters and see how this turns out. I guarantee you Mueller is saving this as memo Comey style.
Trump should meet Mueller on the tarmac using his secret John Barron name"former federal prosecutors say there are no rules that would prevent a president from passing along messages to the special counsel through an attorney."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ler/547917001/
Unreal. Reck still doesn't understand what obstruction of justice means.
ing re .
This raid isn't going to go the way you think this raid is going to go.So they are raiding Manaforts home?
Weren't they supposed to be looking into Clintons?
Unreal. Trump trying to obstruct justice again.
ing re .It may be unethical and/or stupid, but It's not illegal so that means its ok because he has a magic "R" behind his name.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 08-09-2017 at 11:50 AM.
People get their houses raided by the FBI all the time, sheeple.
Whataboutism
PS: for the ignorant, trying to deflect from a damning issue by bringing up red herrings is exactly what the Soviets would do when they would evoke the ills of the US when came up in their own backyard. You dip s eat it up.
PSS: Trump POTUS not Clinton.
Make a prediction based on this incoherent mess of a "theory".
Define the testable elements.
"Trump warns of 'dangerous low' in Russia relations"
See Fact #3
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/03/po...tin-sanctions/
I find the use of the term "dangerous" to be somewhat telling.
He has repeatedly shown the only thing he is ever genuinely concerned about is himself.
At some point, if the Russians do have compromising material, they might decide to release it. From Trump's selfish perspective, bad relations would vastly increase the danger of that material being made public.
One also has to wonder that after Trump is no longer useful to Russia, when that material will find its way into the light of day.
Once Trump is no longer useful to Putin, then it would be in Russia's interests to release it, since the ensuing scandal would presumably damage US democracy, a chief Russian aim.
If the material were personal in nature, i.e. tapes with pros utes, it would be pretty easy for them to release it at no cost to themselves.
If the material implicated Russians, such as money laundering that would less likely to be released, unless of course the Russian involved were already disgraced or removed from power.
---------------------------------------
This is what an active, testable theory looks like. Clearly stated, with a method of falsifiability baked into it.
This is how you detect bull .
Find me an expert that says the President communicating messages to the special counsel through an attorney is obstruction of justice.Semen shielder #1 here to serve and swallow.
I can find you another "expert" who says otherwise, you cuck.
Let him keep sending love letters and see how this turns out. I guarantee you Mueller is saving this as memo Comey style.
I said it was. Not them.
It is highly innapropiate and not reccommended, however.
How can you not see that? Guy investigating you...so you decide to be in communication with that said person? A case can be made you're trying to interfere by doing that.
Not to worry though, dont think Mueller is not keeping count of the contacts Trump has already tried to make with him.
It's not. It is unusual, and borders on unethical to send unsolicited communication, especially when you are quite possibly going to be affected.
It seems like he is either hoping to butter the guy up, or try to open some line of communication not subject to disclosure.
Client attorney privilege is a good way to keep people from finding out things you would rather not find out, don't you think?
Communication between Trump and his attorney is protected. If one wanted to send a message along that you wanted to keep secret, that would be a good way to do it.
Talk about a red flag, jeez.
You just said you would find me an "expert" who says otherwise. Can you not find one or were you just talking out your ass?
"Otherwise" being the keyword there.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
