Reply With Quote
In other words:::He mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
You should read a bit more about Russian capabilities, viewpoints, and aims.If I can't prove it was someone else, then it was obviously Russia. Pantsuit told us all 17 intelligence agencies have confirmed.
People who know vastly more about those things do not find this so funny, or implausible.
Why do you think that is?
In other words:::He mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
Pee pee tape
You are certainly taking all the bodily fluids in the face defending your Dear Leader.
well well well
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...do ents.htmlJudicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department to obtain Comey's do ents.
foxnews.com reports: Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department on Friday in an effort to obtain any non-disclosure agreements signed by former FBI Director James Comey.
The Freedom of Information Act lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, after the DOJ did not respond to the conservative watchdog's June 13 FOIA request. The group wants to see any such agreements in light of Comey's controversial decision to leak notes describing conversations with President Trump.
“How is it the FBI allowed Mr. Comey to walk out the door with sensitive do ents about President Trump?” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “It is remarkable that we have to sue the FBI in federal court to get these answers about this scandal.”
In the lawsuit, Judicial Watch is seeking “any and all non-disclosure agreements pertaining in full or in part to the handling, storage, protection, dissemination, and/or return of classified and/or sensitive information that were signed by or on behalf of former FBI Director James Comey.”
(sighs)
Quit being a stupid mother er.
I have said, more than once, it could be any one of a number of things, including possibly laundering money or simple bank loans.
I noticed you didn't answer my question.
I would like you to explain Trumps newest remarks.
Or answer the question:
Are Trumps statements on the forced reduction of Embassy staff in Moscow consistent with my theory?
"Trump warns of 'dangerous low' in Russia relations"
See Fact #3
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/03/po...tin-sanctions/
This statement is consistent with the theory and was predicted by it.
---------------------------------------
The veto-proof sanctions bill on Russia from Congress forced him to do something. His signing statement says that his administration will ignore or attempt to bypass as much as possible.
http://www.marke ch.com/story/tex...ill-2017-08-02
This action is consistent with the theory, and predicted by it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trumps newest Russian statements go out of their way to be obsequious and servile.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is your stupid ass gonna say if this finally pans out?If I can't prove it was someone else, then it was obviously Russia. Pantsuit told us all 17 intelligence agencies have confirmed.
You are going to look even more like a stupid than you do for continually denying climate change every year there is a new record set for hottest temperatures.
Pick the ground you want to rhetorically die on. Choose carefully, and think about what happens to people who trust Trump. Not a commander I would follow to war, he would grab your ass to use as a human shield if he thought it would save him, and you ing know it.
Well well well what?
Trash's mahouts are now claiming Trash, when thanking BFF financier Pootin for "firing" US embassy people, was being sarcastic, or joking.
Should the troops in Syria refuse to follow orders?
Well this is a waste of time. Those do ents are classified.
They're not gonna let a bunch of butthurt conservatives get a hold of these do ents because they filed a silly lawsuit.
Judicial Watch gets a hold of classified do ents all the time.
If they get them this way they aren't classified.
How Trash laundered for Pootin's people
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemoc...0922294667485/
GW Law Professor Calls Manafort Warrant Excessive, ‘Very Troubling’
George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley said Friday that the no-knock FBI warrant executed on former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s home was “excessive” and “very troubling.”
“I actually think people are a little bit too thrilled to see [a] Trump associate subject to a no-knock warrant. I’ve been a critic of no-knock warrants for years,” Turley said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “It’s very troubling. I think it was gratuitous, I think it was excessive.”
Turley added that no-knock warrants are usually reserved for violent offenders or drug traffickers. “It is not the norm to have a no-knock warrant in a white collar crime case. No-knock warrants were designed primarily for dangerous drug dealers,” he said.
“Federal judges have completely refused to carry out their duty to restrict this. I mean what did they think he was going to do? Try to flush his laptop down the toilet or meet them at the door with a Glock?” Turley asked.
MSNBC host Joe Scarborough pushed back, saying it’s impossible to know for certain if the raid was gratuitous. Turley responded that the issue wasn’t with the validity of the warrant, but rather with the manner in which it was carried out.
“The point is there there was no basis, it’s excessive, to do the no-knock. To come barging in, pre-dawn as if he’s a physical danger or he would destroy evidence,” Turley replied.
“Do you think he’s going to start swallowing thumb drives? All they have to do is knock on the door, if he doesn’t open it they take the door down. The point is this seemed to be a bit gratuitous in showing up at his bedroom door on a no-knock,” Turley said.
“This may be a small point but many of us on the civil liberties side have been arguing against no-knocks for years,” he concluded.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/11/gw-law-professor-calls-manafort-warrant-excessive-very-troubling/
Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) is demanding Special Investigator Robert Mueller appear at a public congressional hearing
From The Daily Caller:
Texas Republican Rep. Brian Babin is asking for congressmen to sign onto a letter requesting that special counsel Robert Mueller appear publicly in a congressional hearing, The Daily Caller has learned.
Mueller, who is investigating Russian election interference and possible ties between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, has come under intense criticism from allies of President Donald Trump for hiring attorneys who have donated to Democratic candidates and for his personal relationship with former FBI Director James Comey. Trump himself has called Mueller’s employment of Democratic donors “ridiculous,” yet he maintains that he has no plans to dismiss the special counsel.
Babin’s letter, which was obtained by TheDC, was sent out to congressmen Thursday and asks for members to cosign a letter he plans to send to House Judiciary chairman Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley.
“Every nominee for United States Attorney must be confirmed by the Senate, a process that brings to the forefront any concerns regarding the nominee’s ability to hold their position in a decent and impartial manner. However, as Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III and his team of lawyers investigate our very own president, we as a nation wait in the dark with very little information about those given this great authority,” Babin wrote in the letter to his fellow representatives.
Babin writes in the letter that there are “serious concerns” about conflicts of interest with regard to members of Mueller’s counsel who donated “generously” to Democrats or even represented Clinton herself.
“In addition, this investigation has the potential to drag on for months, or even years, and cost millions in taxpayer dollars,” Babin added.
Babin’s goal is to have one or both of the judiciary committees “bring Mr. Mueller and his team out of the shadows” to answer questions about the “potential expenses incurred by Mr. Mueller, the scope of his investigation and the selection of his special council team.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/11/exclusive-congressman-circulates-letter-to-ask-for-mueller-to-appear-in-public-congressional-hearing/
If Trump did nothing wrong, what are you all worried about?Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) is demanding Special Investigator Robert Mueller appear at a public congressional hearing
Welp x2
If you could sue the governmnent for classified material, a lot of people would be doing it. Doesn't work that way.
I have a feeling TSA was talking about the Clinton Emails which the DOJ was set to release in time anyways as those were official state department records. No one sues the government for classified infomation and gets it.
A deep state coup of course.
Walk us through how that would happen, Chris. It's such a big concern of yours, tell us how a deep state coup would play out.
Ask Chuckie "Six Ways to Sunday" Schumer
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
