Stupid People like this are as big a danger to this country as any racist

[Spurtacular]

Of course you were. You were trying to big time BB saying you couldn't stoop to his level if he hadn't researched 9/11 like you have. Don't try to walk it back now.

The Commission report is not an engineering do ent. There really is no reason for it to go in depth on a building in which no one died. If only there was a do ent about WTC 7, right?

Bigtime BB! Dude, he was unwilling to say if he even studied the matter. Then you logged into this alt and not surprisingly tried to pass yourself off as 'the most knowledgeable layman on 9/11' You even cited a couple books to cement your BRAGGING. Now, that's "bragging," brah.

"The WTC report is not an engineering do ent". Come on now. It's supposed to be a comprehensive report. Pretending that building 7 didn't happen is beyond amateur hour. Not even going to add the LMAO to that. Cos it's the work of murderers, so that.

[Spurtacular]

"for a fact"

In your opinion, why and how was WTC7 intentionally demolished?

Better question, what kind of bull reason you going to present that it wasn't demo'd?

[Pavlov]

Bigtime BB! Dude, he was unwilling to say if he even studied the matter. Then you logged into this alt and not surprisingly tried to pass yourself off as 'the most knowledgeable layman on 9/11' You even cited a couple books to cement your BRAGGING. Now, that's "bragging," brah.

Just giving some background. I do know that I am more knowledgeable about 9/11 than you because you can't even describe the government's theory on the mechanism of collapse.

You still can't.

Therefore, I am more knowledgeable about 9/11 than you.

"The WTC report is not an engineering do ent". Come on now. It's supposed to be a comprehensive report. Pretending that building 7 didn't happen is beyond amateur hour. Not even going to add the LMAO to that. Cos it's the work of murderers, so that.

So you would want the government to focus on WTC7 and how it fell?

[Mikeanaro]

Time and time again, the metal skeletons of skyscrapers have stood following fires. The falsers want us to believe that 9/11 broke the mold. The reality is those towers were demo'd. We know for a fact Building 7 was demo'd. Oh, but we're supposed to believe that the impact of the plane in another building made it so weak that it just fell. Yea, even the WTC Commission knew they couldn't pass off that bull ; so, they just skipped it.

The Pentagon attack was weird too, there is an old guy dying that said he was part of the implosion work, this is the article

http://www.disclose.tv/news/we_blew_...eathbed/139692

Its was planned in 1997 he says and I find that credible in the sense that USA needed an enemy to get all the goodies from Saddam, just like if USA invades Venezuela they will free people from that dictator but at the same time they will keep the petroleoum.
Business.

[Pavlov]

Better question, what kind of bull reason you going to present that it wasn't demo'd?

demanding to prove a negative again!

Truthers never fail to fail.

[Spurtacular]

How many billions did he net off the destruction of the entire complex?link to his telling the family?Tell me -- how do firemen implode buildings on site?

This is what happens with truthers. They get all excited and say "wellwhataboutthisandwhataboutthat" and get really angry when asked simple questions about it.

But I'll bite -- walk me through Silverstein's plan and how he carried it out.

His family members didn't show up. I could find it; but why bother with that tedium? You think that it's just a big coincidence (among the many others) that they all didn't show up to work that day?

Silverstein said that he ordered the demo of building 7; and he greatly financially benefited. These are irrefutable facts.

[Pavlov]

In USA people uses a lot of drywall to build things, here in Arg is not used a lot since most things are build using bricks and cement.

So when I had the chance to do a little acoustic treatment I used drywall and asked the guy who was doing the installation if it was water resistant because it looked so weak compared to bricks and he told me it can resist water for a month before collapsing, there is an abandoned house on the other block and there was a piece of drywall on the floor and it resisted for a whole month the rain and all the harsh weather before turning into crap.

So I find pretty hard to find such a monster steel based structure can collapse because of fire, and humanity has never seen something like that.

Did humanity ever see jumbo jets fly into skyscrapers at 500+ mph?

[Spurtacular]

demanding to prove a negative again!

Truthers never fail to fail.

That negative is annoying. And why do you so egregiously misuse language? Demanding? I mean, are you just that gimpy of a troll? I respect good trolling. Gimpy trolling, no. So, let's make this not "negative" for your snowflake ass; how did building 7 fall?

[Spurtacular]

Did humanity ever see jumbo jets fly into skyscrapers at 500+ mph?

And yet, they didn't even knock the buildings out of alignment; so, I don't know what re ed point you're trying to make.

[Pavlov]

His family members didn't show up. I could find it; but why bother with that tedium?

You sure as don't want to educate yourself about the collapse mechanism.

You think that it's just a big coincidence (among the many others) that they all didn't show up to work that day?

Certainly could be.

Silverstein said that he ordered the demo of building 7

How do firemen demo buildings onsite?

and he greatly financially benefited. These are irrefutable facts.

How much did Silverstein net off his alleged scheme compared to what he would have made just renting out the WTC all those years? Give me a number since you've done the research.

[Pavlov]

That negative is annoying. And why do you so egregiously misuse language? Demanding? I mean, are you just that gimpy of a troll? I respect good trolling. Gimpy trolling, no. So, let's make this not "negative" for your snowflake ass; how did building 7 fall?

If only the government did some sort of engineering study on WTC7 -- maybe I could tell you.

And yet, they didn't even knock the buildings out of alignment; so, I don't know what re ed point you're trying to make.

Out of alignment? That's the only problem you think two jumbo jets flying into skyscrapers could potentially cause?

[Spurtacular]

The Pentagon attack was weird too, there is an old guy dying that said he was part of the implosion work, this is the article

http://www.disclose.tv/news/we_blew_...eathbed/139692

Its was planned in 1997 he says and I find that credible in the sense that USA needed an enemy to get all the goodies from Saddam, just like if USA invades Venezuela they will free people from that dictator but at the same time they will keep the petroleoum.
Business.

Yup, just some more poorly planned bull that chump thinks we're supposed to believe. They must not've been expecting video footage of that bomb going off and no ing plane. And amateur hour once again....no plane debris and not even an indication that a plane had struck! But the govt. didn't come down on anyone? Of course 9/11 was an inside job.

[Pavlov]

Yup, just some more poorly planned bull that chump thinks we're supposed to believe. They must not've been expecting video footage of that bomb going off and no ing plane. And amateur hour once again....no plane debris and not even an indication that a plane had struck! But the govt. didn't come down on anyone? Of course 9/11 was an inside job.

What are you on about now?

You're seriously a no-planer too?

BTW, the story he linked was a debunked one about WTC7. You didn't even read that.

[Spurtacular]

You sure as don't want to educate yourself about the collapse mechanism.


Certainly could be.

How do firemen demo buildings onsite?

How much did Silverstein net off his alleged scheme compared to what he would have made just renting out the WTC all those years? Give me a number since you've done the research.

Certainly could be; but that'd be one of many convenient "cir stances."

Bro, don't be acting like I ever said I'm claiming expert status. Prove the negative as you'd say and show me Silverstein didn't financially benefit. We all know he did. I have no ing plans of being a paralegal on this one. Well, I'll do it if that means you're gonna shut the up or you pay me, maybe. But I don't give a about placating you, when if you're some sort of authority as you claim, you should already know that he ing made bank on that . Are you denying that he didn't?

And go ahead and tell us how building 7 fell; still waiting for that answer. Do you not have bull to offer on that?

[Spurtacular]

If only the government did some sort of engineering study on WTC7 -- maybe I could tell you.

Out of alignment? That's the only problem you think two jumbo jets flying into skyscrapers could potentially cause?

Mmm. So, you're saying the govt. covered up. But let's trust them, anyways, you say.

I didn't say it's the only problem, obviously. Again, another gimpy restate by you. You haven't made any sufficient arguments about how how the jets caused steel building to fall for the first time. , much more powerful bombs in 93 at the base of the tower couldn't even do that; yet, you want us to just believe the unbelievable.

[Pavlov]

Certainly could be; but that'd be one of many convenient "cir stances."

Or just something that happened. I wouldn't expect a guy like that to be there every day.

Bro, don't be acting like I ever said I'm claiming expert status. Prove the negative as you'd say and show me Silverstein didn't financially benefit.

Not how it works. You made the claim. You have to back it up.

We all know he did.

We do not.

I have no ing plans of being a paralegal on this one. Well, I'll do it if that means you're gonna shut the up or you pay me, maybe. But I don't give a about placating you, when if you're some sort of authority as you claim, you should already know that he ing made bank on that . Are you denying that he didn't?

I am saying you haven't proved that he did compared to his just renting out the complex all those lost years.

And go ahead and tell us how building 7 fell; still waiting for that answer. Do you not have bull to offer on that?

We can get to that. I'm still waiting for you to look up the government's theory on how 1 and 2 fell. Let's start there, shall we? I know it and you don't, so you should look it up real quick like.

I'll know you're serious about your research if you do.

[Spurtacular]

What are you on about now?

You're seriously a no-planer too?

BTW, the story he linked was a debunked one about WTC7. You didn't even read that.

1:23

Do you see a plane?

[Pavlov]

Mmm. So, you're saying the govt. covered up. But let's trust them, anyways, you say.

I'm actually making fun of you. There is quite an extensive engineering report covering the collapse of WTC7. Anyone who has researched 9/11 should know that.

I didn't say it's the only problem, obviously. Again, another gimpy restate by you. You haven't made any sufficient arguments about how how the jets caused steel building to fall for the first time. , much more powerful bombs in 93 at the base of the tower couldn't even do that; yet, you want us to just believe the unbelievable.

You haven't looked up arguments about how the jets caused the steel buildings to fall.

In all your years of research, you still think they say jet fuel melted the steel.

[DarrinS]

Meh, not really

[Pavlov]

1:23

Do you see a plane?

Tell me what the frame rate is on that security camera and how fast Flight 77 was traveling. I'm sure you've come across that in all your years of research.

[Spurtacular]

[Pavlov]

Does it have spooky synth music?

What are you saying hit the Pentagon?

[Spurtacular]

Tell me what the frame rate is on that security camera and how fast Flight 77 was traveling. I'm sure you've come across that in all your years of research.

Again, attacking me is not a defense. So, go ahead and tell me where that plane was. What's that, you can't?

See vid above for more.

[Spurtacular]

Does it have spooky synth music?

What are you saying hit the Pentagon?

A bomb, probably. Certainly wasn't a plane though. Or do you think the plane just incinerated?

[Pavlov]

Again, attacking me is not a defense. So, go ahead and tell me where that plane was. What's that, you can't?

What is the frame rate of that camera and how fast was Flight 77 reported to be flying at that time?

See vid above for more.

No.