Reply With Quote
I knew you had nothing. Forfeit was your only option.
The evidence is you're tied by the nutsac to the Trump Wagon and it scares you that the wagon may crash.
Blind loyalty is all the evidence you pathetic followers need.
Sad.
I knew you had nothing. Forfeit was your only option.
Actually, the point is that you have nothing. You bring nothing to the table. You just want to find a way to sperm shield for the govt. for a week.
Agreed.
#Chump
I'm not the one accusing Mueller of being corrupt.
Actually, the point is that you have nothing. You bring nothing to the table. You just want to find a way to sperm shield for the govt. for a week.
You are.
And your complete failure to provide any evidence of his corruption can only lead me to conclude you're just full of and parroting some right-wing talking point without thinking at all.
Again.
I've never understood this argument from the Trump s
Someone else: "Can you provide evidence of [insert unsubstantiated Trump claim here]?"
Trump s: "Why don't you find the evidence if it's so important lololol triggered liberal!!"
Why are you so against providing evidence of the claim you're making?
Imagine how well this argument would work in court:
"The defendant is guilty"
"Do you have proof of that?"
"Why don't you go find the proof if you think it's so important!!!"
Or the ol' "prove a negative" challenge.
Well you show me your evidence he isn't corrupt!
If I prove Mueller is a fraud to you, what do I get out of it? And you wouldn't accept valid findings, anyhow. It's just a matter of efficiency.
But we're not in court. And I'm not a paid prosecutor. So, pull your head out of your sanctimonious ass.
What do you get out of making baseless bull claims besides getting pissy when they are challenged?
Mueller is a paid prosecutor.
How about you simply give us a dossier of Mueller's shady dealings.
No Sherlock.
Even more than spending hours proving to your sperm shielding ass. I get not wasting a day on you.
I imagine the same thing you got for all of your other posts in this thread telling people Mueller was corrupt and that we need to open our eyes, and you saw that as a worthwhile exercise.
It takes less time to provide a link to your "source" than it your post probably took, I don't understand why you're acting like it's such a labor-intensive task.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Try to follow along.
1) You made a claim.
2) You were asked for proof of your claim.
3) You failed to provide any proof of your claim.
4) We laughed at you.
5) You demanded I find proof for your claim.
6) We laughed at you again.
Mueller's a Clinton shill. Corruption comes with the territory. If you're interested in knowing everything he's done, google it. If you're interested in sperm shielding, find someone else to jack off on you.
And yet, here you are.
Pr
ve my claim! G
So your admitting whatever corruption charges Mueller is supposedly guilty of wouldn't meet an adequate standard of proof in court?
How am I being sanctimonious?
I'm not interested in knowing everything he's done, I'm just asking you to back up the claim you thought was important enough to post on a message board full of random people.
It's not like I made a thread about it. I made an off-handed comment about him. You and Chump are the ones wanting to make it into a federal case. Yet, I doubt either of you are really interested in his corruption because you perceive he is serving your side right now.
See, you can't even give me a dossier of Mueller's shady dealings for starters, yet it's so important for you to have a discussion on this.
You felt the need to bring him up in a completely unrelated thread.
If the prosecutor in charge of investigating the president was corrupt and had a political agenda, shouldn't that be made into a federal case? If not, then whatever corruption you speak of is apparently not a very big deal.
I haven't seen any corruption to be interested in.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
