Keith Olbermann nails Trump on his Texas Trip

[Will Hunting]

Or, they just call you stupid.

are you really triggered over someone saying ducks is stupid?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Goodness gracious, dude. You don't even follow your own bull to be giving me this lecture right now. You used an appeal to authority fallacy right after calling out your ad hominem bull .

Logic requires strict rigors. You are hardly qualified to be enacting it as an absolute basis for discussion.

A) I thought logic didn't matter here.
B) you don't know what appeal to authority means.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Labeling people racist is a hack move.

Darrin needs a racist safe space.

[Spurtacular]

anyobdy who belittles BLM, coopts it with All Live Matter, and/or Blue Lives Matter, uses SJW as a nasty pejorative, denying that social (and environmental) injustices even exist, is a ing racist (who's too stupid, ignorant, ball-less to admit it, because his racism is politically correct)

Dude, you're hack as !

* BLM is racist as !
* All lives do matter (and so do blue lives) if we're gonna go down the feel good road.
* Liberals love to use the word pejorative to sound smart. Just say insult for 's sake. And yes, SJW is an insult; and rightfully so.
* How the did environmental become part of your definition of racism, you ing loon?
* Politically correct racism? The !?!? OMG, you're a ing dip !

[Spurtacular]

anyobdy who belittles BLM, coopts it with All Live Matter, and/or Blue Lives Matter, uses SJW as a nasty pejorative, denying that social (and environmental) injustices even exist, is a ing racist (who's too stupid, ignorant, ball-less to admit it, because his racism is politically correct)

Pavlov

You gonna call him out on this whack , or are you a full-on lib in the us vs. them game?

[Spurtacular]

Why is that funny? You somehow felt a need to lump blacks with antifa. Care to explain?

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

You gonna call him out on this whack , or are you a full-on lib in the us vs. them game?

Dude speaks for himself, no one else.

Why is that funny? You somehow felt a need to lump blacks with antifa. Care to explain?

I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius.

[Spurtacular]

A) I thought logic didn't matter here.
B) you don't know what appeal to authority means.

It's not that logic is of no consequence. It's that deuches like you pretend there's ought to be some strict adherence when it suits you even though you don't follow the rigors of logic in your own right. And ad hominem is about the duechiest card of all to play, tbh.

And I'll remind you that this is a message board and not a classroom. Time and place matters, deuche.

[Spurtacular]

Dude speaks for himself, no one else.

I figured you didn't have the balls to call out one of your own.

[Spurtacular]

I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius.

While making the case that he was racist. How is having an unfavorable view of antifa racist?

[Pavlov]

I figured you didn't have the balls to call out one of your own.

He's not one of my own. We are all individuals here. Some less than others.

While making the case that he was racist.

I just said he hates black people.

How is having an unfavorable view of antifa racist?

I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius.

He hates black people and posts about three things almost exclusively. One of those topics is black people whom he hates. Another is Antifa.

Do you understand now?

[Spurtacular]

He's not one of my own. We are all individuals here. Some less than others.

You've definitively chosen sides. You're just taking your pussification to another level by not owning it.

[Pavlov]

You've definitively chosen sides. You're just taking your pussification to another level by not owning it.

"the us vs. them game"

Are you serious?

This is childish.

[Spurtacular]

"the us vs. them game"

Are you serious?

This is childish.

My point exactly. Why are you playing it?

[Pavlov]

My point exactly. Why are you playing it?

You're menstruating about the fact I'm not playing it.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's not that logic is of no consequence. It's that deuches like you pretend there's ought to be some strict adherence when it suits you even though you don't follow the rigors of logic in your own right. And ad hominem is about the duechiest card of all to play, tbh.

And I'll remind you that this is a message board and not a classroom. Time and place matters, deuche.

I'll put your accusation about our use of logic with the same standard of proof you have demonstrated on everything else in this thread. You have avoided discussing Olbermann's argument above all else in this thread.

And I know it's not a classroom. It's been entertaining reading you fumble around on the subject and I have no interest in teaching you. I am content to laugh.

[Spurtacular]

You're menstruating about the fact I'm not playing it.

No, I'm not. If you weren't playing the us vs. them, you'd be calling the out. But it was one of your own, so you coyly did some each to his own stuff like a total pussy.

[Pavlov]

No, I'm not. If you weren't playing the us vs. them, you'd be calling the out. But it was one of your own, so you coyly did some each to his own stuff like a total pussy.

Anyone here can say any stupid he wants. boutons does all the time. You probably do more. You menstruate more about it for sure.

[Spurtacular]

I'll put your accusation about our use of logic with the same standard of proof you have demonstrated on everything else in this thread. You have avoided discussing Olbermann's argument above all else in this thread.

And I know it's not a classroom. It's been entertaining reading you fumble around on the subject and I have no interest in teaching you. I am content to laugh.

Avoided; more like disregarded. Olbermann is a total c*nt. I think anyone paying attention gets that.

Bro, I wouldn't take logic lessons from you. You don't even follow the rigors. I'd be cool with it if you were a true academic who was consistent. But little deuche boys who call ad hominem when it suits them and don't even know all the fallacies or care to know them is something else.

[Spurtacular]

Anyone here can say any stupid he wants. boutons does all the time. You probably do more. You menstruate more about it for sure.

Yes, he does. But you don't harass the people on your side is the point. You couldn't even be bothered to say an adverse word 'til you got repeatedly called out.

[Pavlov]

Yes, he does. But you don't harass the people on your side is the point. You couldn't even be bothered to say an adverse word 'til you got repeatedly called out.

You're still menstruating about it.

@ your trying to impose rules here.

[Spurtacular]

You're still menstruating about it.

@ your trying to impose rules here.

Not imposing anything. Just calling you out for being a poser 'team player.'

[Pavlov]

Not imposing anything.

I said "trying" -- you're failing at that too.

Just calling you out for being a poser 'team player.'

team

What an infant you are. You're sore because I tell you how stupid the things you say are and you feel like I'm picking on you.

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper

Will be honest, bro. I thought you were a more hardcore troll than that.

I wasn't really doing the political forum when you were active under this name; but only trolling certain political classes? Giving passes to dumb asses? I figured you didn't discriminate. But hyper-partisan hacky trolling? That's weak even for a troll, dude. Dayamn!

[Pavlov]

ChumpDumper

Will be honest, bro. I thought you were a more hardcore troll than that.

I wasn't really doing the political forum when you were active under this name; but only trolling certain political classes? Giving passes to dumb asses? I figured you didn't discriminate. But hyper-partisan hacky trolling? That's weak even for a troll, dude. Dayamn!

Just ask me to stop picking on you nicely. It might work.