Nobody on my team is disrespecting the flag or out National Anthem. This is the work place, your personal problems (non work related) don't belong.
Kaepernick is an idiot.
You called it sexist, snowflake.
Nobody on my team is disrespecting the flag or out National Anthem. This is the work place, your personal problems (non work related) don't belong.
Kaepernick is an idiot.
So, anyone who accurately calls you out on your sexism is a snowflake?
your constant reminders of how little you care about threads is as eerily su ious as when DD stops in threads to tell us all about how he's not gay
yes i'm sure the colts and niners are thrilled that scott tolzien and brian hoyer are running their systems.
So you're fine with my sexist term? OK. Don't know why you bring it up then.
chump trying to start the multi page rodeo again. thats hilarious.
you should see Houston post Harvey
The seats would still be empty with Kraep. Their team is horrible and their stadium was built directly under the blazing hot sun with no dome.
Well, they aren't chomping at the bit to get the ty CK to run them.
Are you just dumb or do you intentionally mis-frame the arguments. Of course I have no problem with the term.
Then why are you bringing it up? Are you hoping someone else will be a snowflake for you?
![]()
So, you are that dumb. Thanks for confirming.
It's not about the term. You relegated a sex, dumb .
You're taking exception to that?
Snowflake.
I'm far from a feminist. But if you're making a point that public actions should be based upon sexism, then you're not living in reality. The owner doesn't get the luxury of saying, it's okay Kap come aboard cos she's just a dumb c*nt after all. If he could, then I might be on your side. But this is a c*nt he'd have to treat with kid gloves. He probably doesn't want to do that. Not everyone is as cucky as you.
wut
Of course he has the luxury. He's a billionaire. He can hire whoever he wants.The owner doesn't get the luxury of saying, it's okay Kap come aboard cos she's just a dumb c*nt after all. If he could, then I might be on your side.
Why are you using that word when you were triggered by my use of the word "girl"?But this is a c*nt he'd have to treat with kid gloves. He probably doesn't want to do that. Not everyone is as cucky as you.
I figured it went w/o saying; but the owner doesn't get to call this out for being a c*nt with impunity. And regardless of whether he can hire him, anyways, it comes down to want. I don't know many billionaires let alone many businessmen who get shat upon by some and then hire their boyfriend or husband. That's how the real world works, bro; not the cuck world you live in.
Why should he care at all? He owns an NFL team.I agree the world is full of sensitive snowflakes.And regardless of whether he can hire him, anyways, it comes down to want. I don't know many billionaires let alone many businessmen who get shat upon by some and then hire their boyfriend or husband. That's how the real world works, bro; not the cuck world you live in.
Including NFL owners.
Including you.
Why should he care about his reputation? I guess that's a hard one for a sperm shield like you to understand.
Why would a tweet do anything to his reputation? He's a snowflake about that too?![]()
Yea, tweets mean nothing. We just had a guy ride his way to a presidency on tweets; but tweets mean nothing.
Imbecile.
You're saying this billionaire's entire life and reputation would be ruined by one tweet.
![]()
As usual, you restate an argument not being made.
OK, what are you saying exactly?
One doesn't project power with putting up with . CK should've kept his woman in check. Dude's a ing train wreck.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)