I answered your question, as asked, stupid mother er. Don't blame me because you are too stupid to understand the answer.
[smiley][derision]
That's why that is a common response to your tantrums, tbh. You're being obstinate. You've even went onto a new tangent while not answering the fundamental question of whether the waivers are bad in the first place.
I answered your question, as asked, stupid mother er. Don't blame me because you are too stupid to understand the answer.
You.just got done ranting about refusing to answer. Are the waivers bad irrespective of who issues them?
no. he owes the $$$ back to the tax paying citizens of this nation for bailing out our banks here, laundering our money to pay for DACA bs and illegals, giving our money to faces overseas, and more. that puto!
You can right off. Not answering your question, until you answer mine, chicken . Quid pro quo.
I will not play your game on your terms.
You do know the bailouts were approved by Bush, right?
Any other derp you want to roll around in?The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Division A of Pub.L. 110–343, 122 Stat. 3765, enacted October 3, 2008), commonly referred to as a bailout
the banks paid back with interest. Taxpayers made over $87 billion profit on the total bailout program.
https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/
Cept I already answered a question if this is quid pro quo. But I'll give you two. The Clinton Foundarion is compromised. Are the waivers bad irrespective of the issuer?
you're an imbecile
You cant even do simple google searches and here you are claming the Clinton Foundation is compromised.
Do your research and get back to me
*does so*
Derptacular runs away from thread.![]()
bailouts are like 2nd place trophies. they should never be given out.
"Claiming" is stating the obvious.
Today's tranny.
the regressives love that **** so much they'd rather turn a blind eye to her and her cronies crimes. her, her cronies, and her supporters.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)