Reply With Quote
Not directly.
I specified trump. Chris posted a meme about Trump being tapped.
i then responded with
and you immediately butted in and suggested the le I warrant would allow them to do just that. it's completely understandable if you want to walk that claim back, though.to wiretap trump
Not directly.
could trump be wiretapped because of a le I FISA warrant on Carter Page yes or no
Where are all the records of the Trump monitoring?
I did not suggest a le I would allow them to wiretap Trump I said it would allow surveillance of Page's contacts.
I asked you a broad question about surveillance and you continue to try and deflect.
Try again. During the campaign and post election do you think the FBI/DOJ did all of this surveillance by the books yes or no?
No, not directly.
Horowitz
where were they before then?
Great!
1) so was i justified in laughing at the notion of them being allowed to wiretap Trump?
2) what exactly do you mean by "surveillance of Page's contacts?"
do you mean it in the context of them getting "swept up?" if somebody wiretaps my cousin's cell phone and i proceed to call his cell phone and chat with him, that doesn't mean i was wiretapped.
asked and answered. i have no personal knowledge outside of what's been reported. given that, no, i dont have much reason to think otherwise. they had all the right people sign off on the right do ents/applications. unless i'm missing some critical component.I asked you a broad question about surveillance and you continue to try and deflect.
Try again. During the campaign and post election do you think the FBI/DOJ did all of this surveillance by the books yes or no?
are you alleging that they tapped devices other than which they were authorized to?
i dont know what that means
if somebody wiretaps my cousin's cell phone and i proceed to call his cell phone and chat with him, that doesn't mean i was wiretapped.
given that standard, could trump be wiretapped because of a le I FISA warrant on Carter Page yes or no
is he even looking into FISA stuff? my understanding is he's investigating the handling of the clinton email investigation/matter
Well he is the guy who totally exonerated Holder for fast and furious, so you can see why TSA is so excited.
Judiciary chairman wants FISA judge to reveal more info on Page surveillance
http://www.cnn.com/2018/02/07/politi...ge0602PMVODtop
“Judge Rosemary Collyer was the FISC Justice who wrote the extensive 99-page opinion (based on the reporting by NSA Director Mike Rogers and the admissions from the Department of Justice) that outlined the intentional abuse and misrepresentations to the FISA Court within the FISA-702 process.”
Poor TSA. Ron Jonhnson's conspiracy already dead within minutes.
You will never learn
No, not directly.
When you were chatting with your cousin were you also being listened to?
do you know how phone calls work?
again, if my cousin has been wiretapped, and i call him and chat with him, it would be inaccurate to say i was wiretapped.
given that standard, could trump be wiretapped because of a le I FISA warrant on Carter Page yes or no
“What exactly the text refers to isn’t specified in the exchange. Associates of the FBI employees said it refers to preparation to brief Mr. Obama about Russian interference in that year’s election.”
Associates of the FBI employees most likely mean Page/Strzok themselves
How many times must I answer no? Are you too stupid to realize Trump does not need to be directly wiretapped to still be under surveillance?
When you were chatting with your cousin were you also being listened to?
There’s overlap because of Strzok and McCabe working on both Clinton email and Russia investigation.
there's overlap because they're both FBI investigations
Great! So I was justified to laugh here.
and you brought this up for no good reason except to make the BOMBS revelation that people can get swept up in targetted surveillance?
is that what you meant by "surveillance of any contact"... getting swept up?
and if that IS all you meant... that contacts could get "swept up" as part of the surveillance, why the whole dog and pony show about le I vs le VII? that's why i think you're disingenuous
I hope you were laughing at Reck
The text messages between Strzok/Page were from September 2016, when did the investigation into Russian interference begin?
Targeting person A for surveillance knowing you will also get person B is not the same as incidental collection
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
