Reply With Quote
What about bad guys that got shot but didn't die. Are those included in the stats? I appreciate you digging this up tbh
i don't own a gun atm. however, i don't agree they should be banned/outlawed. it's just ridiculous.
What about bad guys that got shot but didn't die. Are those included in the stats? I appreciate you digging this up tbh
i mean the numbers are there for everybody to see. we see murder rates in other western countries (lol holding our standard to "being better than el salvador and honduras). we see that we are an outlier.
it just comes down to "yer not taken muh guns"
You mean like people who think Sandy Hook was faked in a studio?
that's a good question. but then we should also look at all the good guys that got shot but didn't die (scalise, etc).
just given the stats on the killings, pretty hard-pressed to believe we'd find the polar opposite results in non-lethal shootings tbh
now in those stats of yours, how many are legal citizens?
do my work form me
none of them tbh
all are border jumpers 100%
What a bunch of en led whiners.
Actually, that is what it comes down to. There is this inconvenient little thing called a cons ution.
Thats all you said tbqh. That you are an idiot.
Gotcha
except i've never advocated for mandatory confiscation of all guns.
we had a federal ban on "assault weapons" for a while, that wasn't deemed uncons utional
Love discussing hypotheticals about preventing gun massacres when we have actual examples of effective policy ins uted in other developed countries.
i don't think anyone thinks that... i don't know much about that incident but i have read some of the theories. crisis actors? who knows... who really ing knows what bigGov hides from us. we all speculate but if you want to believe in bigGov 110% then go for it.
Do a search for "crisis actor" in this forum.
BTW the vast majority of the murders you guys keep referring to were done with pistols. You gonna take those too?
Yeah, I didn't say that. My stance was how it was logistically impossible for twig boy to get off all the firing in that amount of time. So, yeah, stick to your Trump Boogeyman and advocating no personal accountability.
Which guns did he say he was going to take in the first place?
It was a generic "you guys" for the anti gun crowd.
So chump, which guns do you want to ban?
all of them would be the answer. the dems would love to outlaw them all right away but baby steps always lead to the end game. and the dems have a cult that follows their every word regardless. baaa baaa baaa baaa
a handgun ban would not pass, thanks to er and McDonald, so that's a moot point unless public opinion becomes so one sided that SCOTUS will bend. don't see that happening tbh. besides, i dont think i would support a universal gun ban even if there was no 2nd amendment
best we could do is ramp regulations, rather than outright bans.
i think the big issue is the sheer availability of guns in the US. we have more per capita than anywhere. nobody even comes close. i would like the idea of having a voluntary gun buyback program, sorta like cash for clunkers. and have the govt destroy those weapons (or sell them to ISIS. jk). find a way to slow production. expanded background checks, mandatory training, and regular mental health evaluations. limit how many rounds a non-vendor can own, etc.
Last edited by spurraider21; 02-23-2018 at 05:26 PM.
I understand you're mad about being so completely wrong about Chris Kyle, but building straw men isn't the best way to deal with it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
