This is your white flag
"Lack of Candor" relates to many things in the FBI's eyes. Could be the way he behaved or it could be for withholding information or being unthetical. It's a broad term.
The report is not even out yet but they would have said if the reason he got fired for was for lying under oath. I didn't see that anywhere. Have you?
Oh yeah, Jim Jordan the hyper caffeinated looney doesn't count.
This is your white flag
Huber has the power to prosecute.
A Special Counsel may be needed.
Are these statements mutually exclusive?
Left out the part where you said “he doesn’t need a special counsel”
Huber does not need a Special Counsel to prosecute.
A Special Counsel may be needed.
Are these statements mutually exclusive?
Can you explain why a special counsel may be needed if Huber doesn’t need one to prosecute?
These are stupid questions coming from a lawyer.
Huber’s power to prosecute does not depend on a Special Counsel. A Special Counsel may be needed if Huber runs into a conflict of interest.
Are Republicans hoping for a conflict of interest?
Really, why are all of you making such a big deal out of the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel?
It really seems you're envious that the "other side" "has" one.
No one here is making a big deal about the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel. You all just have to keep being corrected when you continue to claim Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed.
You're making an enormous deal out of it. As is everyone on Team Dennison.
Are Republicans hoping for a conflict of interest?
Really, why are all of you making such a big deal out of the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel?
It really seems you're envious that the "other side" "has" one.
No 2nd special counsel. TSA mad.
but there is no 2nd Special Counsel
Maybe someday your dream will come true, but for now there is simply no 2nd Special Counsel.
Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
There is no 2nd Special Counsel.
Full stop.
I don't know why your team wants one so badly and you have to pretend you don't, but you currently do not have one.
Accept it.
Dodging a simple yes or no question
Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
Sorry, you have questions pending you are dodging for a second day.
There is no second Special Counsel.
You are free to explain why it is so important for you to scream for days that you think there still could be one -- some sweet day....
But you're dodging that.
You are asking me to speak for all Republicans, stupid questions will be denied.
Don’t be a coward.
Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
Nope.
I asked you why it is so important for you to declare the continued possibility of a second Special Counsel.
You can't deny your wanting to keep this hope alive.
Why?
Don't be a coward. This is your stand.
Already answered.
The OP stated a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed.
I’ve lost count of your cowardly dodges.
Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
In a way, yes.
The fact there is no second special counsel should answer your question.
If you have to qualify with “in a way” that means no.
If a Special Counsel was needed Friday, we'd already have one.
That's all anyone was saying.
You want to hold out the Team Dennison hope that one may be appointed one fine day.
Sure.
The situation could change.
So what?
This goes way beyond trying to correct one minute point you don't care about.
Your effort over the past two days proves it's important to you -- as important as it is to the rest of Team Dennison.
Why is the possibility of a second Special Counsel important to you?
Not appointing a second Special Counsel is extremely strong evidence a second Special Counsel is not needed tbh.
The entire letter is Sessions' explaining what he did instead of appointing a second Special Counsel.
Last edited by Pavlov; 03-31-2018 at 02:11 PM.
This one minute point is the crux of this thread. You sure did a lot of hand waving to finally admit the OP was full of .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)