Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 789101112 LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 286
  1. #251
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    What was McCabe fired for genius?

    The Sessions has been repeatedly debunked by not only the FBI but also by Mueller.
    "Lack of Candor" relates to many things in the FBI's eyes. Could be the way he behaved or it could be for withholding information or being unthetical. It's a broad term.

    The report is not even out yet but they would have said if the reason he got fired for was for lying under oath. I didn't see that anywhere. Have you?

    Oh yeah, Jim Jordan the hyper caffeinated looney doesn't count.

  2. #252
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    your career in law.
    This is your white flag

  3. #253
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    This is your white flag
    Huber has the power to prosecute.
    A Special Counsel may be needed.

    Are these statements mutually exclusive?

  4. #254
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Left out the part where you said “he doesn’t need a special counsel”

  5. #255
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Left out the part where you said “he doesn’t need a special counsel”
    Huber does not need a Special Counsel to prosecute.
    A Special Counsel may be needed.

    Are these statements mutually exclusive?

  6. #256
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Huber does not need a Special Counsel to prosecute.
    A Special Counsel may be needed.

    Are these statements mutually exclusive?
    Can you explain why a special counsel may be needed if Huber doesn’t need one to prosecute?

  7. #257
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Can you explain why a special counsel may be needed if Huber doesn’t need one to prosecute?
    These are stupid questions coming from a lawyer.

    Huber’s power to prosecute does not depend on a Special Counsel. A Special Counsel may be needed if Huber runs into a conflict of interest.

  8. #258
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    These are stupid questions coming from a lawyer.

    Huber’s power to prosecute does not depend on a Special Counsel. A Special Counsel may be needed if Huber runs into a conflict of interest.
    Are Republicans hoping for a conflict of interest?

    Really, why are all of you making such a big deal out of the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel?

    It really seems you're envious that the "other side" "has" one.

  9. #259
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Are Republicans hoping for a conflict of interest?

    Really, why are all of you making such a big deal out of the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel?

    It really seems you're envious that the "other side" "has" one.
    No one here is making a big deal about the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel. You all just have to keep being corrected when you continue to claim Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed.

  10. #260
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    No one here is making a big deal about the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel. You all just have to keep being corrected when you continue to claim Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed.
    You're making an enormous deal out of it. As is everyone on Team Dennison.

    Are Republicans hoping for a conflict of interest?

    Really, why are all of you making such a big deal out of the possibility of a 2nd Special Counsel?

    It really seems you're envious that the "other side" "has" one.

  11. #261
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218
    No 2nd special counsel. TSA mad.

  12. #262
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    No 2nd special counsel. TSA mad.
    ^^^

    You all just have to keep being corrected when you continue to claim Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed.

  13. #263
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    but there is no 2nd Special Counsel

    Maybe someday your dream will come true, but for now there is simply no 2nd Special Counsel.

  14. #264
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    but there is no 2nd Special Counsel

    Maybe someday your dream will come true, but for now there is simply no 2nd Special Counsel.
    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?

  15. #265
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
    There is no 2nd Special Counsel.

    Full stop.

    I don't know why your team wants one so badly and you have to pretend you don't, but you currently do not have one.

    Accept it.

  16. #266
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    There is no 2nd Special Counsel.

    Full stop.

    I don't know why your team wants one so badly and you have to pretend you don't, but you currently do not have one.

    Accept it.
    Dodging a simple yes or no question

    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?

  17. #267
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Dodging a simple yes or no question

    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
    Sorry, you have questions pending you are dodging for a second day.

    There is no second Special Counsel.

    You are free to explain why it is so important for you to scream for days that you think there still could be one -- some sweet day....

    But you're dodging that.

  18. #268
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Sorry, you have questions pending you are dodging for a second day.
    You are asking me to speak for all Republicans, stupid questions will be denied.

    Don’t be a coward.

    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?

  19. #269
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    You are asking me to speak for all Republicans, stupid questions will be denied.
    Nope.

    I asked you why it is so important for you to declare the continued possibility of a second Special Counsel.

    You can't deny your wanting to keep this hope alive.

    Why?

    Don't be a coward. This is your stand.

  20. #270
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Nope.

    I asked you why it is so important for you to declare the continued possibility of a second Special Counsel.

    You can't deny your wanting to keep this hope alive.

    Why?

    Don't be a coward. This is your stand.
    Already answered.

    You all just have to keep being corrected when you continue to claim Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed.
    The OP stated a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed.

    I’ve lost count of your cowardly dodges.

    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?

  21. #271
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
    In a way, yes.

    The fact there is no second special counsel should answer your question.

  22. #272
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    If you have to qualify with “in a way” that means no.

  23. #273
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Already answered.



    The OP stated a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed.

    I’ve lost count of your cowardly dodges.

    Did Sessions say there was no need for a Special Counsel yes or no?
    If a Special Counsel was needed Friday, we'd already have one.

    That's all anyone was saying.

    You want to hold out the Team Dennison hope that one may be appointed one fine day.

    Sure.

    The situation could change.

    So what?

    This goes way beyond trying to correct one minute point you don't care about.

    Your effort over the past two days proves it's important to you -- as important as it is to the rest of Team Dennison.

    Why is the possibility of a second Special Counsel important to you?

  24. #274
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    If you have to qualify with “in a way” that means no.
    Not appointing a second Special Counsel is extremely strong evidence a second Special Counsel is not needed tbh.

    The entire letter is Sessions' explaining what he did instead of appointing a second Special Counsel.
    Last edited by Pavlov; 03-31-2018 at 02:11 PM.

  25. #275
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    If a Special Counsel was needed Friday, we'd already have one.

    That's all anyone was saying.

    You want to hold out the Team Dennison hope that one may be appointed one fine day.

    Sure.

    The situation could change.

    So what?

    This goes way beyond trying to correct one minute point you don't care about.

    Your effort over the past two days proves it's important to you -- as important as it is to the rest of Team Dennison.

    Why is the possibility of a second Special Counsel important to you?
    This one minute point is the crux of this thread. You sure did a lot of hand waving to finally admit the OP was full of .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •