Reply With Quote
The *ding
Susan Rice says hi.
The *ding
lol
get em Huber
Boente is one of Trump’s guys dipindeed
lol
Repug MISgovernance amounts to blocking all legislative progress for the lower 80%, while attacking any and all non-Repugs with bogus crimes.
Might not need Huber imo Comey may throw everyone under the bus before it's all said and done.
Last edited by Chris; 04-18-2018 at 03:26 PM. Reason: Slovenian censorship
Gotta love Gowdy giving lip service to Trump s
Gotta love people stealing my
Gotta love the direction this thread is taking
has Flynn withdrawn his guilty plea yet?
according to your girl Sarah Carter, Mueller turned over all the evidence 3 weeks ago
Serious question for you since you're a lawyer.
Do you think there is exculpatory evidence and if there is none how does that factor in to the verdict/sentencing etc..? Non partisan assessment please.
Interesting you edited in that next sentence after I posted.
Boente is one of Trump’s guys dip
Is Mueller a Trump guy since he's a 'Republican' racist Pavlov?
a) Unless we've seen the prosecution's file, it's hard to know what evidence does and doesn't exist.
b) In the context of a case where the charge is making false statements to the FBI, nobody knows better than Flynn if he lied or not, so I'm having a pretty hard time thinking of what exculpatory evidence could even exist for a charge like that.
c) There's been zero movement on the case that would indicate a plea withdrawal or anything like that is even in the works. From my understanding, Flynn's team has had access to all of the evidence since the parties entered their stipulated motion back in February. If there was exculpatory information, Flynn's team would have seen it by now, and he would have stopped cooperating and taken steps to withdraw his plea by now.
So in conclusion, as Flynn's team has had access to everything for well over a month now (even Sarah Carter reported over 3 weeks ago that all the do ents had been provided), and we've heard absolutely nothing about a change in their arrangement, it's a pretty safe bet that there is no noteworthy exculpatory evidence, or at least not enough to exonerate Flynn.
was probably happening at the same time tbhInteresting you edited in that next sentence after I posted.
I would hope that there are people in government/law enforcement that don't approach their jobs in a blindly partisan manner... ie a republican prosecutor that always lets republicans go, or always over-zealously targets democrats, and vice-versa
so yeah its very possible for mueller to be a republican but not allow his political views to get in the way of his job/duties
If the 302's were changed, as reported as what Sara Carter was told from sources, I wouldn't expect anything to be leaking out of the Flynn case as those 302's would be evidence in a criminal investigation.
they don't have to leak anything. Flynn could still be taking steps in withdrawing his guilty plea without leaking the evidence to the public. it's not like you would be required to remain guilty indefinitely
the docket shows nothing https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...tates-v-flynn/
they could keep the pleadings sealed if there was some concern, but they'd still be posted as something. all we have is a bunch of denials for third parties trying to file on Flynn's behalf, probably just political activists who think he's actually getting exonerating, but needs their help!
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Emergency Moton to Intervene Filed on Behalf of all Americans
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED-Letter Regarding the Passing of Stephen Hawking
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Mankind's Death Certificate was Signed on October 12, 2050 with not so much asa Whimper. as to MICHAEL T. FLYNN
Who is Aaron Zebley? He worked for Mueller at WilmerHale and is currently on Mueller's special goon squad investigating Trump. Also served as Mueller's chief of staff while he was FBI director. Why does that matter? Zebley recently represented Justin Cooper. Who is Justin Cooper? Cooper testified he set up Hillary's private server. ("but her emails") He also used a hammer to destroy her mobile devices so the FBI couldn't acquire them during Comey's 'thorough' investigation into HRC. Are you connecting the dots yet?
yeah, this is kind of the thing im talking about. your assumption is that everybody here is completely controlled by a political ideology. lawyer's represent people all the time without sharing their views. criminal defense attorneys dont condone the criminal acts of their clients.
if this guy was mueller's chief of staff and also worked for him in private practice, then he's somebody mueller trusts as competent.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
