Arizona schools proposing drafts to remove the word "evolution" from science books

[spurraider21]

The straw man is that you are saying I'm saying you can't have a position. I've argued that this is not a really big issue; you are pretending that it is. Also, speaking of straw mans, when did I say science shouldn't be taught?

All this from the guy who was lecturing me that I see what I want to see.

oh, so all that to say that you agree with me that science should be taught in science classes, and not christianity

glad we're on the same page. coulda skipped a lot of dialogue

i just think the issue is more important than you do. that's ok.

[Spurtacular]

oh, so all that to say that you agree with me that science should be taught in science classes, and not christianity

glad we're on the same page. coulda skipped a lot of dialogue

i just think the issue is more important than you do. that's ok.

Well, one I don't think you have to be Christian to believe in intelligent design. But isn't it interesting that that triggers you without me even bringing it up? Easy call for Chris, tbh.

I think that the genesis of Earth and mankind is all rooted in theory; so it's a bit of a strawman for you to hide behind some pretend pure science on this one.

[spurraider21]

Well, one I don't think you have to be Christian to believe in intelligent design. But isn't it interesting that that triggers you without me even bringing it up? Easy call for Chris, tbh.

you didnt have bring it up. it is the subject matter of this thread. ever since post #3.

I think that the genesis of Earth and mankind is all rooted in theory; so it's a bit of a strawman for you to hide behind some pretend pure science on this one.

as long as the theory is scientific, it should be taught in science classes.

[Spurtacular]

you didnt have bring it up. it is the subject matter of this thread. ever since post #3.


as long as the theory is scientific, it should be taught in science classes.

I haven't made any religious arguments whatsoever for it (in this thread or any other even).

Kids are learning the building blocks of science. You're basically crying that kids might catch wind of a theory not sanctioned by liberals and possibly have a different truth than yours.

[Blake]

Well, one I don't think you have to be Christian to believe in intelligent design. But isn't it interesting that that triggers you without me even bringing it up? Easy call for Chris, tbh.

I think that the genesis of Earth and mankind is all rooted in theory; so it's a bit of a strawman for you to hide behind some pretend pure science on this one.

Intelligent design isn't science either.

Reading Chris and derp's re ed posts on this subject just further confirm to me how important this is.

[Spurtacular]

Intelligent design isn't science either.

It's a theory of genesis just like evolution is one. Designating either as an absolute science is sketchy. Try to keep up, cuck.

[Pavlov]

I haven't made any religious arguments whatsoever for it (in this thread or any other even).

Kids are learning the building blocks of science. You're basically crying that kids might catch wind of a theory not sanctioned by liberals and possibly have a different truth than yours.

You're saying 21 is concerned kids won't be taught science in science class.

Pretty reasonable of him tbh.

[Pavlov]

It's a theory of genesis just like evolution is one. Relegating either as an absolute science is sketchy. Try to keep up, cuck.

You are displaying a profound ignorance of science. You're just the kind of person who wants to replace science with religion -- even if you have to use the "intelligent design" fakery.

[Blake]

It's a theory of genesis just like evolution is one. Designating either as an absolute science is sketchy. Try to keep up, cuck.

No it's not.

ID had it's day in court to show that it is science and got blown out.

Another few pages and you might catch up.

[spurraider21]

It's a theory of genesis just like evolution is one. Designating either as an absolute science is sketchy. Try to keep up, cuck.

Genesis isn't a scientific theory. It therefore has no place in science classes.

These concepts are incredibly simple tbh.

[Pavlov]

Genesis isn't a scientific theory. It therefore has no place in science classes.

These concepts are incredibly simple tbh.

NO YOU CUCK PZWNED

[johnsmith]

People that don’t want evolution taught in schools are absolutely the same as flat earthers.

For that matter, I wish someone would explain to all those opposed of evolution as to what a “theory” means in a scientific sense.

[Chris]

Genesis isn't a scientific theory. It therefore has no place in science classes.

These concepts are incredibly simple tbh.

“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ - Albert Einstein, 1941

Guess you know more than Einstein.

[johnsmith]

“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ - Albert Einstein, 1941

Guess you know more than Einstein.

So your argument is “Einstein made this comment and therefore creationism should be the only thing taught in school”?

Am I getting that right?

[Pavlov]

“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ - Albert Einstein, 1941

Guess you know more than Einstein.

It was published in 1954, and I wholeheartedly agree with Einstein:

Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts.

So keep religion out of the science class. Easy peasy.

[Blake]

“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ - Albert Einstein, 1941

Guess you know more than Einstein.

How old do you think the earth and the universe both are, Chris?

[johnsmith]

How old do you think the earth and the universe both are, Chris?

I work with an extremely religious dude that genuinely thinks the world is roughly 4,000 years old because of his religious upbringing....he’s an idiot.

[dabom]

It was published in 1954, and I wholeheartedly agree with Einstein:



So keep religion out of the science class. Easy peasy.

[Pavlov]

“Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind.“ - Albert Einstein, 1941

Guess you know more than Einstein.

And if you choose to die on Einstein Hill, old Al will gladly pull the trigger:

The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me.

Yeesh, Chris.

[Spurtacular]

Genesis isn't a scientific theory. It therefore has no place in science classes.

These concepts are incredibly simple tbh.

genesis (little g) as in a beginning, dude. Ffs, you're so triggered. And you're also a nazi pretending that your uncomfirmed science is higher than others. Get over yourself.

[Pavlov]

genesis (little g) as in a beginning, dude. Ffs, you're so triggered. And you're also a nazi pretending that your uncomfirmed science is higher than others. Get over yourself.

What is your theory of genesis?

[Spurtacular]

How old do you think the earth and the universe both are, Chris?

Ya'll should know you've lost when cucks like blake think they're scientific thinkers.

[Spurtacular]

I work with an extremely religious dude that genuinely thinks the world is roughly 4,000 years old because of his religious upbringing....he’s an idiot.

And you know it's not, somehow? (BTW, 6,000 is the more accepted #). I think it's idiotic for you to pretend like you know something you don't know.

[Blake]

genesis (little g) as in a beginning, dude. Ffs, you're so triggered. And you're also a nazi pretending that your uncomfirmed science is higher than others. Get over yourself.

Evolution is confirmed science. ID isn't.

You're really ignorant.

Another few pages, you might catch up

[Blake]

And you know it's not, somehow? (BTW, 6,000 is the more accepted #).

Accepted by kooks maybe.

You're completely wrong and stupid.