le XII, Sub le D.
What part of HR 5515 has to do with Russia?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...ouse-bill/5515
le XII, Sub le D.
Last edited by Pavlov; 08-15-2018 at 11:49 AM. Reason: Spoon feeding intensifies.
Stone. Cold.
Props.(waits for Darrin to be unable or unwilling to do the homework)
Found it, and found where exactly the president's signing statement address that section. If you can't find it, ask politely, and I will give you the section. I would prefer you do your own work first though.![]()
I thought it had to be a trick question when the string "russia" got 89 hits on a simple text search.
Thanks for the link, Darrin.
![]()
Sub le D—Air Force Programs
Sec. 141. Inventory requirement for air refueling tanker aircraft; limitation on
retirement of KC–10A aircraft.
Sec. 142. Limitation on use of funds for KC-46A aircraft pending submittal of
certification.
Sec. 143. Retirement date for VC–25A aircraft.
Sec. 144. Contract for logistics support for VC–25B aircraft.
Sec. 145. Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft.
Sec. 146. Removal of waiting period for limitation on availability of funds for
EC–130H Compass Call recapitalization program.
Sec. 147. Findings and sense of Congress regarding KC–46 aerial refueling
tankers.
Sec. 148. Sense of Congress on conversion of F–22 aircraft.
Sub le E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 151. Buy-to-budget acquisition of F–35 aircraft.
Sec. 152. Certification on inclusion of technology to minimize physiological episodes
in certain aircraft.
Sec. 153. Armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles
???
Ok, found it
Sub le D--Matters Relating to the Russian Federation
Sec. 1241. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty
of the Russian Federation over Crimea.
Sec. 1242. Limitation on availability of funds relating to
implementation of the Open Skies Treaty.
Sec. 1243. Determination required regarding material breach of INF
Treaty by the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1244. Comprehensive response to the Russian Federation's material
breach of the INF Treaty.
Sec. 1245. Report on implementation of the New START Treaty.
Sec. 1246. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance
Initiative.
Sec. 1247. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the
United States and the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1248. Sense of Congress on enhancing deterrence against Russian
aggression in Europe.
What about it?
le XII, Darrin.
I'll add it to my original answer just for you.
Putin puppet signs 717 billion defense bill
![]()
I've never registered or tried to register an alt account.
Darrin's strategy for the rest of today:
![]()
darrins used to be anti-christ. but he's still a birther.
What would prevent an ally of Russia's from funding the development of its own combat vehicles, aircraft, and military salaries? Do you think Putin's goal is to suffocate the US Military industrial complex?
I mean, what a stupid thing to find contradiction in. Next you'll tell us Russia couldn't possibly be involved with the NRA because it doesn't want Americans to be armed.
You completely missed the entire point I made, because you didn't read the signing statement, obviously. I guess I can set aside any animous and attempt to walk you through an exercise in critical thinking.
Helpfully:
What does the signing statement have to say about section 1241, specifically?
What part of the statement bothers you?
Trump just revoked Brennan’s security clearance
isn't that like trump to take away something they don't need.
Answering a question with a question isn't going to help you understand here.
Again, read through the signing statement, and think about what the significance of signing statement are, i.e. the interpretation and intention of the executive branch with regards to the bill.
Find the sections where Russia is mentioned, and see what the President thinks about them.
NECESSARY!
Thoughts?
He’ll probably start a goFundMe and rake in a small fortune from resis s.
So no thoughts on the actual actions of Trump.
We expected none from you.
after Brennan, Trash looking at 9 other critics to slander and punish, cancel their clearances
... if Obama had punished his critics
So the Dear Leader once again, plays petty politics, and does something small-minded and unpresidential, and you got... "resis s".
Someday, you will get your nose out of his ass.
So Trump pretty much admitted to obstruction of justice.
“I call it the rigged witch hunt, [it] is a sham,” Mr. Trump said in an interview. “And these people led it!”
He added: “So I think it’s something that had to be done.”But I'm sure you don't think the laws apply to Republicans."whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)."
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)