Page 146 of 257 FirstFirst ... 4696136142143144145146147148149150156196246 ... LastLast
Results 3,626 to 3,650 of 6407
  1. #3626
    5 is real faggy! Mikeanaro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    9,312
    Lol, I love the music and those shady faces, this whole show is like the Homer Simpson Venus Gummy episode.

  2. #3627
    Veteran Th'Pusher's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    6,130
    Didn't he give a sworn statement under penalty of perjury? that did not substantiate her allegations.
    Rmt, you’re the worst. You really can’t come up with any reasonable excuse as to why the FBI shouldn’t interview Mark Judge. If your boy Kavanaugh is innocent, he has nothing to lose.

  3. #3628
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    I don't think it's amazing any more. It's par for the course after Trump got the presidency on conspiracy theories.
    Now K

    Holy ...

    No composure whatsoever. Goes from crying to enraged. Bipolar as and absolutely all the hallmarks of a LYING sob.

    Someone has got to have stated the following somewhere. I can’t be the only one to see this:

    K expressed outrage at absolutely the wrong subjects and blathered crying, steaming then wandering. If he is being hideously lied about, you continually go back to Ford and state she is a sick lady who may be very hurt, but is absolutely not telling the truth, or is a liar and probably a calculating one. And you get it in during EVERY fckn question. You constantly pound on her testimony. He does something very familiar to me so this must have been stated: He got himself OUTRAGED AT SOMETHING OTHER THAN HER TESTIMONY so he could hold his lying ass together with zeal while NOT coming back to what should be the real outrage... HER FCKN STORY

    What does K do? He fckn states how hard he has worked for all this? WTF? How he remembers things so well at parties even with alcohol? (Nobody fckn remembers things well at parties, there are too many things going on) Admit, of course, you can’t recall everything, but something this serious is absolutely clear because it’s so awful, ( even in a super drunken state) which you ADMIT to being drunk on occasion because you DID party. Just fckn admit it. But instead, He’s the captain of the basketball team. Details of his great sporting friendships? Wtf? He continued to focus on the side issues to get and keep himself pissed and or focused on anything but her and her very destructive testimony. Her testimony. And again, her testimony. He won’t do it, he wanders off into what an upstanding guy he is or gets outraged at anything but the real,issue. Blantant tactic of liars.

    Lindsey Graham pulled something I have seen before. Feigned outrage. He excels at this But is so old. Great acting, unlike K. But same act. The only part he can play effectively.

    Then...
    Basic red team “question”: We apologize for all the horror you had to go thru.... oh you to Dr. Ford, because your honesty kicked our ass. Then more legit outrage at timing and red team screwing up not attending a meeting.

    Someone is lying. And It’s solidly him. If this could just be determined I would make a butt load of cash on a wager.

    Where are we now?
    They had to delay a vote just like the blue team hoped for correct?
    Last edited by pgardn; 09-27-2018 at 11:04 PM.

  4. #3629
    Banned
    My Team
    Golden State Warriors
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    66
    Turns out his attorney wrote that. It's void basically.

    He could lie and not be held to account because it's not his actual signature.

    kind of like Trump did with the pornstar payoff.

    David Dennison
    Agreed. He was allowed to perjure himself, legally. Anyone that can't see that is an idiot.

  5. #3630
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    A sworn statement on a page is no subs ute for an impartial investigator from the FBI who can ask follow up questions to his claim.

    Mark Judge was hidden away by republicans because they are hiding something and they are avoiding a real impartial investigation. NEW ALLEGATIONS RESURFACED - after Kavanaugh's background investigation was already closed. This is why from the beginning there has been a rush and the hiding of hundreds of thousands of do ents.
    LOL - you mean like those at FBI who decided that Hillary was only extremely careless with classified information? those who texted of insurance plan against Trump? If the Dems really wanted an investigation, that Senate Judiciary committee could have run one 2 months ago (and kept her anonymity) but no, Dems wanted to leave it until right before vote was taken for maximum political impact. BTW, did you see Feinstein get caught - saying that she HADN'T asked her staff if anyone leaked about Ford and then turn around and say that she just did? Two weeks since the leak and she's only now asking? Give me a break.

  6. #3631
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Some of you pretend that the Dems care anything about Ford - they don't (not that the Repubs do either) - it's all politics. If they cared, they would have asked K about the allegations or done the above post (both the committee investigation and WHO did the leak).

  7. #3632
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Where are we now?
    They had to delay a vote just like the blue team hoped for correct?
    They haven't delayed anything AFAIK. Corker already has announced he'll vote to confirm. Sasse said he finds Ford credible but sounded like he'll confirm to own the libs. Flake didn't seem to give a , spent less than a minute questioning Drunk-ass K even though senators all got five minutes. He's almost surely a yes. He's getting confirmed. The only thing that can stop it is both Collins and Murkowski voting no together, and Collins has sounded on Kavanaugh's side all week. This Republican political operative is going to be on the court.

  8. #3633
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    Some of you pretend that the Dems care anything about Ford - they don't (not that the Repubs do either) - it's all politics. If they cared, they would have asked K about the allegations or done the above post (both the committee investigation and WHO did the leak).
    They were respecting her wish to remain anonymous.

  9. #3634
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Some of you pretend that the Dems care anything about Ford - they don't (not that the Repubs do either) - it's all politics. If they cared, they would have asked K about the allegations or done the above post (both the committee investigation and WHO did the leak).
    You pretend the Republicans care anything about the truth. Today's hearing made no ing sense if they did with every GOP senator expressing concern at how hard the process was for Ford. Bull , if they're convinced Kavanaugh was telling the truth, then they're convinced she had to be lying and thus would deserve every bit of scrutiny coming after her. But this is the party of truth isn't truth, so no surprise.

  10. #3635
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,591
    LOL - you mean like those at FBI who decided that Hillary was only extremely careless with classified information? those who texted of insurance plan against Trump? If the Dems really wanted an investigation, that Senate Judiciary committee could have run one 2 months ago (and kept her anonymity) but no, Dems wanted to leave it until right before vote was taken for maximum political impact. BTW, did you see Feinstein get caught - saying that she HADN'T asked her staff if anyone leaked about Ford and then turn around and say that she just did? Two weeks since the leak and she's only now asking? Give me a break.
    Obviously you are a FOX news watcher - no need to waste my time.

  11. #3636
    Banned
    My Team
    Golden State Warriors
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    66
    They haven't delayed anything AFAIK. Corker already has announced he'll vote to confirm. Sasse said he finds Ford credible but sounded like he'll confirm to own the libs. Flake didn't seem to give a , spent less than a minute questioning Drunk-ass K even though senators all got five minutes. He's almost surely a yes. He's getting confirmed. The only thing that can stop it is both Collins and Murkowski voting no together, and Collins has sounded on Kavanaugh's side all week. This Republican political operative is going to be on the court.
    Yup. Sucks too. Cos we got our Democrat political operatives Kagan and Sotomayor and were really close to nullifying the Cons ution before Trump had to it all up.

  12. #3637
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Go eat a burger fattie.
    I bet you have a muffin and a hotdog.

  13. #3638
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377

  14. #3639
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Talk about zero knowledge - whew - that is exactly the amount you displayed in this post = zero.

    She was 100% credible and honest. She said she either gave the WAPO - notes - or told them verbally just could not remember at this moment and it wasn't a huge issue - she admitted that she did give the content to them one method or the other.
    She said she did not really look or pay attention to cameras or recording devices but just assumed she was being recorded. She is not in law enforcement or investigations or any kind of profession where she should have intimate knowledge of polygraph workings. (the machine or its hook up procedures which is what she referred to).

    She did not lie about a fear of flying - she testified that she is uncomfortable or gets extreme anxiety being in an enclosed space - which probably started when your frat boy rapist trapped her in a room and covered her mouth and then put his body weight on her until she thought he might accidentally kill her. She has flown when necessary but only after weighing if her anxiety is worth bearing for 4 hours as opposed to driving across the country. Completely reasonable - just ask the millions of humans who have a fear of flying - or some kind of discomfort being trapped in a small enclosed tube for hours.

    All of the above actually makes her more credible - not less. A trained liar (like Kavanaugh or Trump) would actually recite tales that they preconceived in their minds and make sure to wrap their lies neatly in a bow - because they are lying and trying to cover up their lies.
    For example - the lie Kavanaugh told under oath today about that girl in the yearbook that the football team said they were "alumni" of. The one they bragged about banging - (which she called lies - but hurtful/humiliating). Kavanaugh was asked about the meaning of this and he said because they all (the football team) were just "admirers" of the girl.
    A small lie - but the fact that he felt the need to defend a little lie goes a long way in explaining how he is covering up bigger issues/bigger lies.
    He told another little lie regarding his yearbook and barfing - just like as in the prior example he covered this little lie - by making up a new one. Instead of manning up and saying - yeah we partied - we barfed - just like most partying young men - instead - he says he has a weak stomach and this is why he wrote that entry in his yearbook.

    Perjury again. Yet here you are - slandering the victim who was 100% honest and credible - and defending the en led frat boy sexual assaulter.

    It was also established by the hired-hand female prosecutor that she (Dr. Ford) actually reached out to report this assault - BEFORE - Kavanaugh was named as the actual nominee. She began reaching out and reporting her claim when Kavanaugh was just on the "short list" of nominees - blowing the right wing claim and your false claim that she is some kind of left wing operative trying to destroy a good man's name.

    Are you going to say that if Kavanaugh had not been the SC pick that she was just going to change the name of her assaulter AFTER already having reported him?

  15. #3640
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479


    This whole thing really exposed the racists, sexists, and ageists on the left. They really think this is acceptable.

  16. #3641
    5 is real faggy! Mikeanaro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    9,312
    I find amusing they said she ¨was risking everything¨ when is getting 500k just from the gofundme page, let alone under the table money.

  17. #3642
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596


    I feel bad for how Ford was used by the Democrats.

  18. #3643
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    I find amusing they said she ¨was risking everything¨ when is getting 500k just from the gofundme page, let alone under the table money.
    #nothingtogain

  19. #3644
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,943
    she'll be the scapegoat
    86ed not long after Ms. Mitc ventured sexually frank questions with the accused. they didn't like that.

    subsequently, Republican Senators stroked Kavanaugh briskly, Democratic Senators were filibustered and harangued by Kavanaugh.

    stark contrast to Catherine Blasey Ford, who answered frankly, directly and carefully, without any ire, rancor or umbrage, interrupting and filibustering no one.

  20. #3645
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,943
    The majority changed the format midstream to prevent further damage to their candidate. So they could be more fair to Kavanaugh.

  21. #3646
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    86ed not long after Ms. Mitc ventured sexually frank questions with the accused. they didn't like that.

    subsequently, Republican Senators stroked Kavanaugh briskly, Democratic Senators were filibustered and harangued by Kavanaugh.

    stark contrast to Catherine Blasey Ford, who answered frankly, directly and carefully, without any ire, rancor or umbrage, interrupting and filibustering no one.
    What did you expect?

    Classic she said he said. No witneses no nothing

    A Federal Judge vs a teacher that didnt even know why she needed lawyers, didnt know who paid for get poly, she didnt even have exact dates

  22. #3647
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Talk about zero knowledge - whew - that is exactly the amount you displayed in this post = zero.

    She was 100% credible and honest. She said she either gave the WAPO - notes - or told them verbally just could not remember at this moment and it wasn't a huge issue - she admitted that she did give the content to them one method or the other.
    She said she did not really look or pay attention to cameras or recording devices but just assumed she was being recorded. She is not in law enforcement or investigations or any kind of profession where she should have intimate knowledge of polygraph workings. (the machine or its hook up procedures which is what she referred to).
    Your opinion followed by saying basically what I just said - she couldn't remember what she just did. She was asked about giving them basically a transcript, she couldn't recall and said she didn't, then was told that WaPo said she did. You don't need intimate knowledge to know how polygraphs work. You establish a baseline then you start asking question, and yes you have to be hooked up. Neuroscience is requirement for a PhD in psychology. Lie detection is a neuroscience related subject. There's no way in she's unfamiliar with it. She tried to sound like a bumpkin. So you just offer opinions as if they are fact.
    She did not lie about a fear of flying - she testified that she is uncomfortable or gets extreme anxiety being in an enclosed space - which probably started when your frat boy rapist trapped her in a room and covered her mouth and then put his body weight on her until she thought he might accidentally kill her. She has flown when necessary but only after weighing if her anxiety is worth bearing for 4 hours as opposed to driving across the country. Completely reasonable - just ask the millions of humans who have a fear of flying - or some kind of discomfort being trapped in a small enclosed tube for hours.
    Sure she did. Extreme anxiety but flies all over the world for fun. Maybe you don't understand the clinical definition for "extreme anxiety". Was it necessary to go to all those vacation spots? Or to fly across the country every summer instead of driving? Extreme anxiety would say she should avoid flying, not just avoid inconvenient flying. Again, you're clueless.
    All of the above actually makes her more credible - not less. A trained liar (like Kavanaugh or Trump) would actually recite tales that they preconceived in their minds and make sure to wrap their lies neatly in a bow - because they are lying and trying to cover up their lies.
    More opinions and hyperbole. You should feel right at home here with Dijon and Boots.
    For example - the lie Kavanaugh told under oath today about that girl in the yearbook that the football team said they were "alumni" of. The one they bragged about banging - (which she called lies - but hurtful/humiliating). Kavanaugh was asked about the meaning of this and he said because they all (the football team) were just "admirers" of the girl.
    A small lie - but the fact that he felt the need to defend a little lie goes a long way in explaining how he is covering up bigger issues/bigger lies.
    He told another little lie regarding his yearbook and barfing - just like as in the prior example he covered this little lie - by making up a new one. Instead of manning up and saying - yeah we partied - we barfed - just like most partying young men - instead - he says he has a weak stomach and this is why he wrote that entry in his yearbook.
    Where was her yearbook?
    Perjury again. Yet here you are - slandering the victim who was 100% honest and credible - and defending the en led frat boy sexual assaulter.
    Two wealthy white people who did not have sex, one was an underage drinker who cannot recall who picked her up but swears she had only one beer (convenient memory). Goes on to become a prominent researcher and professor, and then one day she decides she might have the winning lottery ticket. She trusts the dems and they actually do 100x more damage to her than the boy at the party did. Now she had to leave her home, go into some kind of protection program, her life will never be the same but she'll write a book and retire from the movie rights.
    It was also established by the hired-hand female prosecutor that she (Dr. Ford) actually reached out to report this assault - BEFORE - Kavanaugh was named as the actual nominee. She began reaching out and reporting her claim when Kavanaugh was just on the "short list" of nominees - blowing the right wing claim and your false claim that she is some kind of left wing operative trying to destroy a good man's name.
    What's your point? She only gave a when she knew Kavanaugh was going to be considered. It didn't seem to matter that he was a federal judge for all those years and affected countless lives, and according to the left, likely gang raped scores of women.
    Are you going to say that if Kavanaugh had not been the SC pick that she was just going to change the name of her assaulter AFTER already having reported him?
    You aren't very bright. Change your user name again and try another round. You strike me as someone who is uneducated.

  23. #3648
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Breaking news chuck is voting for brett per























    Cnn

  24. #3649
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Breaking news chuck is voting for brett per























    Cnn
    Sad that in this day and age you can still bet on people voting their race/gender/nationality.

  25. #3650
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,943
    It was chicken as the way the GOP senators tried to act like they felt Ford was credible and Kavanaugh was innocent. It's ing one or the other.
    Kavanaugh is owed a seat on the Supreme Court because favors to Ken Starr and George W. Bush, and because that was the condition Kennedy insisted on when he retired. And to rub it in the faces of the libs. It's a done deal.

    If Catherine Blasey Ford is telling the truth -- I think she is -- that's just a sweetener: Kavanaugh got away with it and will lord it over all of us for the rest of his life or until he retires.

    Typical preppy en lement/impunity.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •