Reply With Quote
Obama ran a pretty competent government... about as smooth as you could ask for in this chaotic world. And he did it after inheriting a mess.Cos we all know what they'd do; up.
Cos we all know what they'd do; up.
Obama ran a pretty competent government... about as smooth as you could ask for in this chaotic world. And he did it after inheriting a mess.Cos we all know what they'd do; up.
Nonsense. Remember those worthless stimuluses? Obamacare was a joke. The debt doubled. He allowed Iran to keep building nukes. Etc.
WTF? Are you living in an alternate universe?
You are. Median income flat-lined under Obama. No year of three percent GDP growth. Handing out trillions in empty stimuluses. Keeping the CIA's Afghanistan war going. ing up healthcare. Setting back racial relations decades. Just cos you have a man crush doesn't mean Obama was a good president, son.
What has Trump done to advance race relations and end the "CIA's Afghanistan war" and reduce the debt?
All red marks. Never said he hadn't.
What good things has he done?All red marks. Never said he hadn't.
How about you tell me that answer.
I'm asking you since you brought up "all the good things" he's done.
It's your claim. Back it up or yourself again.
Your choice.
Kavanaugh proves one of the nine justices is not like the others
On his first day of arguments, during just one case—Nielsen v. Preap—
Kavanaugh tried to speak at the same time as other justices—
despite the tradition of new justices deferring to established justices—
and interrupted each of the lawyers twice.
Kavanaugh didn’t so much ask questions as make statements. T
he types of statements that should have come from the government’s attorney, not a justice.
When he did ask questions—well, here’s an example of a “question”:
Is that presumption based on what we think was really going through Congress's mind at the time or is it based on a cons utional overlay, because what was really going through Congress's time [sic] in 1996 was harshness on this topic. Is that not right?
Kavanaugh didn’t even pretend he possesses the independence required for a justice.
Justices often pose hypotheticals, detailed grammatical questions bearing on statutory interpretation, and comparisons to other cases and statutes.
They may nudge an attorney to explore an argument or to respond to the opposing party’s argument.
What they don’t do is argue the case for the attorneys before them. Until Kavanaugh.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildksp
K isn't a SCOTUS judge anymore than Trash is a President.
Both are unqualified, ignorant, sexual predator assholes
Democrats didn't leak Dr. Ford's letter—it was most likely the White House
nearly all the press reports prior to and including the New Yorker report that first detailed the contents of Dr. Ford’s letter indicate that
Sen. Feinstein’s office didn’t share anything about the letter with anyone except the FBI on Sept 12.
In fact, the most likely source for the ultimate release of Dr. Ford’s name and iden y was the White House itself.
All their outrage is false.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/180...tories/1803379
the conclusory air of the Daily Moulitsas isn't well supported. doesn't look good for the hypothesis if the New Yorker and Sen Feinstein won't confirm.[I’ve sent out contacts to Sen. Feinstein’s office asking them to confirm that they weren’t the source of the Ford letter leak, although it seems quite obvious from every source that they weren’t. I’ve also contacted the New Yorker and asked the same question, and also asked them if they could confirm that the White House wasn’t a source for the letter. It will be very interesting if they can't easily say no. So far, they have not responded.]
absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence, but for damn sure it isn't evidence of evidence.
Damn you are one stupid mother er.
Link does not even work
Chief Justice Roberts
stresses 'independence from the political branches'
"I will not criticize the political branches," he said, but added that the judicial branch "must be very different."
"I have great respect for our public officials.
After all, they speak for the people,
he said. "But we speak for the Cons ution
We are to interpret the laws and Cons ution of the United States
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/16/p...ity/index.html
Unending Orwellian doublespeak that kills people, destroys the environment, etc, etc.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-17-2018 at 10:05 AM.
rule by unelected judges good now
horrifically, for life, to keep the people down, as the FFs intended
Again, you want us to comment on something that has been settled? lol post padding.
How did he do this?
Be specific now
I didn’t want or need a comment from you. I’m just laughing at djohn bailing the political forum like a little .
Little pussy is too embarrassed to stay and take his lumps.
Ok that's fair. But next time, dont mention me if you dont want a comment.
djohn is the forum's dumbest mother ing sucker for sure. dude gobbles up all the loser trolls/alts/ es every word and is their hype man. that got djohn!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
migrated back up stairs 