Central America is Invading Mexico

[Spurminator]

No. One Dem candidate exposed his anti-border stance. Many support defacto anti-border positions.

You literally said candidates (plural) *pushing* for open borders. It's right there.

Admit it. You bought the narrative and now you feel stupid. It happens, just be better next time instead of doubling down on stupid to protect your pride.

[Spurminator]

And as for the supposed "de-facto" open border positions, that's a lot like saying requiring a search warrant on home searches is a "de-facto" legal child pornography position.

The controversy around sanctuary cities and ICE has more to do with concerns about the rights of citizens and legal immigrants than it has to do with protecting illegals. But again, you've bought the narrative.

You must have watched a TON of Fox News since you abandoned Bernie. Amazing how quickly you allowed yourself to be brainwashed.

[Nathan89]

You literally said candidates (plural) *pushing* for open borders. It's right there.

Admit it. You bought the narrative and now you feel stupid. It happens, just be better next time instead of doubling down on stupid to protect your pride.

So don't quote an entire paragraph without acknowledging that all i need to do is delete an "s".

Stop telling people to admit something that you are incorrect about.

[Pavlov]

That would be irrelevant to the conversation today.

What's his position now?

I'm sure it hasn't changed much since you supported him.

[Nathan89]

And as for the supposed "de-facto" open border positions, that's a lot like saying requiring a search warrant on home searches is a "de-facto" legal child pornography position.

The controversy around sanctuary cities and ICE has more to do with concerns about the rights of citizens and legal immigrants than it has to do with protecting illegals. But again, you've bought the narrative.

You must have watched a TON of Fox News since you abandoned Bernie. Amazing how quickly you allowed yourself to be brainwashed.

It's nothing like saying that. Really the entirety of this comment is nonsense.

[Nathan89]

What's his position now?

I'm sure it hasn't changed much since you supported him.

Do a search.

His position now/then and my support of his is irrelevant.

[Pavlov]

Do a search.

His position now/then and my support of his is irrelevant.

his position now is completely relevant.

I'm sure his position then was much different from yours now. What changed your mind?

[Spurminator]

So don't quote an entire paragraph without acknowledging that all i need to do is delete an "s".

Stop telling people to admit something that you are incorrect about.

Two s's across two separate posts. And "pushing." Are you really going to pretend you meant for it to be singular?

Don't insult my intelligence.

[Spurminator]

It's nothing like saying that. Really the entirety of this comment is nonsense.

That's your conditioning talking. Try harder not to be so desperately gullible.

[Nathan89]

his position now is completely relevant.

I'm sure his position then was much different from yours now. What changed your mind?

His position now is relevant as one politician. It's not worth mentioning.

You're assuming I had the same position as him then. His position to mine and my former support of him is what I was saying isn't relevant.

[Pavlov]

His position now is relevant as one politician. It's not worth mentioning.

You've already mentioned the T-shirt of one candidate, so it's relevant.

You're assuming I had the same position as him then. His position to mine and my former support of him is what I was saying isn't relevant.

Why did you support Bernie?

[Nathan89]

Two s's across two separate posts. And "pushing." Are you really going to pretend you meant for it to be singular?

Don't insult my intelligence.

Overstated isn't worth retracting. I cleared up the position when asked for details. And then you quote an entire paragraph like was all wrong now.

"Don't insult my intelligence."

[Nathan89]

You've already mentioned the T-shirt of one candidate, so it's relevant.

Why did you support Bernie?

Not really worth mentioning those that haven't declared support for open borders.

Not for immigration policy.

[Pavlov]

Not really worth mentioning those that haven't declared support for open borders.

Not even the one with the T-shirt. Your whole argument is irrelevant.

Not for immigration policy.

What for, then?

[Nathan89]

That's irrelevant to the conversation Pav.

[Spurminator]

Overstated isn't worth retracting. I cleared up the position when asked for details. And then you quote an entire paragraph like was all wrong now.

I quoted the paragraph so as not to quote a sentence fragment.

Anyway, I told you why that whole paragraph was wrong beyond the plural. You clearly don't want to explore it further for fear of having to "clear up" your position more.

[Pavlov]

That's irrelevant to the conversation Pav.

We've already established everything you've said is bull , so I've moved on.

[CosmicCowboy]

But you said the party was for open borders. Obama was the figurehead of the party for 8 years. Still is, in a lot of ways.

So which current Democratic officials or candidates have advocated for open borders?

does this sound familiar?

"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, sometime in the future with energy that's as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere,"

[Spurminator]

does this sound familiar?

It sounds like globalism with open borders for the market.

[Pavlov]

does this sound familiar?

"I was talking about energy. You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined," she said. "And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that will be great benefit to us."

lol CC's Facebook feed.

[Nathan89]

I quoted the paragraph so as not to quote a sentence fragment.

Anyway, I told you why that whole paragraph was wrong beyond the plural. You clearly don't want to explore it further for fear of having to "clear up" your position more.

I don't want to go further because the entirety of it has been cleared up

[Spurminator]

I don't want to go further because the entirety of it has been cleared up

No, you don't want to go further on the "de-facto" open borders conversation.

[CosmicCowboy]

"I was talking about energy. You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined," she said. "And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that will be great benefit to us."

lol CC's Facebook feed.

Gullible Chump sucking down H's backpedal after the quote was exposed.

[Spurminator]

Gullible Chump sucking down H's backpedal after the quote was exposed.

Why would she backpedal? Why would left-wing media say she wasn't talking about immigration if the left wants open borders on immigration?

For something that's supposedly so widespread and popular on the left, it's weird they would be secretive about it and go a far as to deny that's what they mean.

You're sucking down Trump and Fox News soundbytes. I thought you were smarter than that.

[Pavlov]

Gullible Chump sucking down H's backpedal after the quote was exposed.

"exposed"

Were that her actual position on immigration she would have said it hundreds of times, dumbass. Not once when talking about energy.

Do you realize how stupid your theory is here?