Pittsburgh shooting

**Reck** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

t it’s irresponsible that this place had an open doors policy.

Isn't that the same for all religious grounds?

It's a sad state that we're in that we need places like that guarded.

**Will Hunting** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by Reck

Isn't that the same for all religious grounds?

It's a sad state that we're in that we need places like that guarded.

Maybe it’s different in Pittsburgh, but my synagogue growing up received some kind of bomb or death threat at least once a week, as did most of the other ones in the Phoenix area, and as a result it had beefed up security.

**TSA** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by Pavlov

I think that's a false premise.

If you believe Reck was totes serious about that, you're an unbelievable snowflake.

You believed Darrin was disappointed that none of the bombs blew up and killed any targets, what does that make you?

**Pavlov** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by TSA

You believed Darrin was disappointed that none of the bombs blew up and killed any targets, what does that make you?

He told me he wasn't disappointed. I believe him.

**Spurtacular** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Not making light of what this guy did, but I’ll at least give him credit for criticizing the hilarious notion that a multi-billionaire who’s various businesses have utilized immigrant labor and overseas labor is going to bring about a populist uprising that defeats globalism.

Not sure how murdering a bunch of random Jews in Pittsburgh will do to end globalism either though, but at least the shooter can say he’s smarter than most Alex Jones listeners

If you really don't get it, you should consider changing your online persona.

**Kim Jong-il** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by DMC

You can always tell by the uncomfortable reaction from onlookers how personal the subject matter became.

This is coming from the guy who fantasizes elaborate gay sex scenarios between other posters

**Nathan89** · 10-27-2018

Paypal and their hosting company cut ties with Gab because the shooter had a profile on there. The shooter had a profile on many social media sites. This was a new hosting company. Microsoft Azure was the previous company but they didn't like Gab's allowance of free speech.

**Nathan89** · 10-27-2018

**Nathan89** · 10-27-2018

**Nathan89** · 10-27-2018

Gab just raised 1mil crowdfunding and now get silenced. Hopefully they come back stronger than ever.

**Winehole23** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by DMC

I asked why they were called. The obvious answer is because they could neutralize the shooter and perhaps save lives. They would have been called even if they were unarmed, but they intentionally are not unarmed. They are not awaiting a Utopian society - they deal with the society we have now.

Why then is it wrong to suggest anticipating these kinds of attacks and being prepared for them is prudent? Does it shatter your imaginary security bubble?

A church or temple needn't be like a Mexican bank, with a bunch of guys with shotguns standing around.

Is that your utopia?

**DMC** · 10-27-2018

Originally Posted by Kim Jong-il

This is coming from the guy who fantasizes elaborate gay sex scenarios between other posters

Alt #58 coming to the rescue of the mansel in distress

**Winehole23** · 10-27-2018

Would that even be desirable?

the tyranny of what is. It can be different.

**Winehole23** · 10-27-2018

Has been in the past, will be in the future.

**Nathan89** · 10-27-2018

Oh, Gab was also blocked from the google and apple app store. Big tech sure does hate free speech. Pathetic companies going out their way to prevent that site from growing.