Reply With Quote
It's already well known he is a beta pussy.
Beto vs. Beta
And said your dad murdered the presidentmaking fund raising cold calls for a guy who called you a liar and talked about your wife
Not even Jeb Bush would be that much of a beta.
It's already well known he is a beta pussy.
"but-but - tough as Texas!"
It's already well known he is a beta pussy.
yeah but Ted's reason for doing it is some real pussy . Shoulda just told the truth, that he did it for white people
A vote for Cruz is a vote against Socialism and open borders.
I don’t fault either guy for doing it, it’s just hypocritical to criticize one and not the other. If people are stupid enough to vote based off what a guy’s name is then that says more about the voter than it does the candidate.
If you want to vote for a beta cuck, you're free to do so.
Voter turnout in Texas is dead last in America
only about one in three Texans line up at the polls during midterm elections, a new study on voter turnout in America finds.
In a Washington Post story examining how easy it is to vote in America,
Texas came in dead last for voting in midterms.
The Lone Star State tied only with Washington D.C., a non-state where residents have no representation in the U.S Senate and House.
It's worth repeating: During election cycles where Congressional seats are up for grabs,
Texans tied in voter turnout with a federal district that has no members of Congress.
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-t...a-13241845.php
So it's the same thing as a vote for Beto.
Only conservatives seem to think their opponent's use of a nickname disqualifies them from the job. Cruz gets called Rafael as a taunt but I haven't seen anyone seriously accuse him of trying to manipulate voters with it.
There is a large contingent of conservatives who seriously think Latino voters are dumb enough to vote for Beto O'Rourke because they think he's Hispanic.
That tears for fears cover is perfect
It's already well known he is a beta pussy.
Ted actually giving all beta males a really bad name out there.
Something tells me that the name change didn’t stop a face as punchable as his from continuing to get bullied either
Go Beto
So what?
Republicans admit hey hate him but still will or already have voted for him.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...lection-222188Maybe 45 percent is simply the ceiling for a Democrat in Texas. But this is overly simplistic. Trump won Tennessee by 26 points—nearly three times the margin of his Texas victory—and that state’s U.S. Senate race has been a dead heat, in large part because the Democrat, former governor Phil Bredesen, is selling a smartly packaged centrism. If O’Rourke loses, Texas might remember him for being singularly positioned to break that ceiling—running in an advantageous environment, against a damaged in bent, bringing historic resources to bear, at a moment of cultural and demographic transition in the state—and failing to capitalize
“It’s the worst campaign I’ve ever run against—or it’s the most brilliant," Jeff Roe, Cruz’s campaign manager, told me. “He’s the best and worst opponent we could have faced. He energized the left and raised tons of money, but had no plan for how to spend it and no plan for building the sort of coalition needed for a Democrat to win in Texas. He ran an entire campaign without pursuing a single Republican vote.” (I reached out numerous times this fall to the O’Rourke campaign seeking an interview about their strategy; his spokesman, Chris Evans, told me after a recent debate in San Antonio that they were no longer talking to national media outlets.)
Given his sudden star power and prodigious fundraising abilities, there is already considerable momentum behind the theory that O’Rourke could segue from a losing Senate candidate to a top-tier presidential contender. But with a debate beginning to rage inside the Democratic Party over how best to defeat Trump—galvanizing the left or recapturing the center—a lopsided loss in Texas could force O’Rourke to answer tough questions relating to ideology and strategy. What exactly, inquiring and envious Democratic minds will want to know, did he do with that $70 million? Why wasn’t he barraging persuadable Republicans with mail and phone calls and door knocks? Could he not identify them because of his campaign’s refusal to invest in polling and data analytics? Did he consciously avoid playing on their issues, determining it was more profitable for his political future to lose as a liberal than compete as a moderate? What was to be gained by calling for Trump’s impeachment? And what evidence exists of his appeal to the middle of the electorate?
Ouch
So he couldn't take his white classmates teasing him so he chose to turn his back on his hispanic heritage and change his name...to Ted. Disgusting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
