Reply With Quote
Reasonable considering the conservative voice of America is being washed out by illegals having anchor babies. There may as well be two separate countries.
Reasonable considering the conservative voice of America is being washed out by illegals having anchor babies. There may as well be two separate countries.
welp
Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen today announced an Interim Final Rule declaring that those aliens who contravene a presidential suspension or limitation on entry into the United States through the southern border with Mexico issued under section 212(f) or 215(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) will be rendered ineligible for asylum.
The Acting Attorney General and the Secretary issued the following joint statement:
“Consistent with our immigration laws, the President has the broad authority to suspend or restrict the entry of aliens into the United States if he determines it to be in the national interest to do so. Today’s rule applies this important principle to aliens who violate such a suspension or restriction regarding the southern border imposed by the President by invoking an express authority provided by Congress to restrict eligibility for asylum. Our asylum system is overwhelmed with too many meritless asylum claims from aliens who place a tremendous burden on our resources, preventing us from being able to expeditiously grant asylum to those who truly deserve it. Today, we are using the authority granted to us by Congress to bar aliens who violate a Presidential suspension of entry or other restriction from asylum eligibility.”
Section 212(f) of the Immigration and INA states that “[w]henever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
Further, Section 215(a) of the INA states that it is “unlawful…for any alien to depart from or enter or attempt to depart from or enter the United States except under such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.”
In Section 208(d)(5)(B) of the INA, Congress specified that the Attorney General “may provide by regulation for any other conditions or limitations on the consideration of an application for asylum.”
Today’s new rule applies to prospective presidential proclamations, and is not retroactive.
Asylum is a discretionary form of relief granted by the Executive Branch on a discretionary basis to those fleeing persecution on the basis of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The rule does not render such aliens ineligible for withholding of removal under the INA or protection from removal under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/doj-a...ew-asylum-rule
welp, look like the regulation conflicts with a law.
the reg will be challenged in court.
I chuckled
What's hilarious is that when the previous administration did this in support of Dreamers, the claim was that the Executive was overreaching...
...and that claim was upheld by the 5th Circuit and an evenly divided Supreme Court.
Executive agency heads have wide la ude to interpret regulations, but that discretion does not permit them to interpret regulations in a way that puts the regulations in conflict with law.
lol kneepad post
They must be at the broder by now. Has the military engaged? Or did they all turn around?
Any updates, Nathan? I know you were following this really closely, and you don't seem the type to just arbitrarily abandon a cause.
They’ve already moved into Southern California and we need to mobilize troops before they occupy San Diego.
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
I was never following this really closely. There was broad conversation and there was narrow conversation (like the ridiculousness of them proceeding when Mexico offered them stay). I would not take in people that didn't have merit to come. I would only take in people temporarily if birthright ended.
Last edited by Nathan89; 11-10-2018 at 12:11 AM.
Which caravan was the shooter in thousand oaks from?
Was he ms13? Honduran? Salvadoran?
You snowflake trump s still trembling?
Fox has fallen absolutely silent about the caravan now that the election is done.
I bet you posted 100 times ITT. Must've been something there to hold you to it.
I'll take the under.
Yeah, it's a problem. I've discussed it.
And you’d lose that bet
If you click on the total number of posts in the thread it breaks down how many were by each poster and you have 148 posts ITT as of this post
The US Border Patrol’s last hiring surge invited a rise in corruption. Now it’s hiring again
A 2015 report from an internal audit by a CBP corruption advisory panel suggested that corruption-related arrests of CBP personnel “far exceed, on a per capita basis, such arrests at other federal law enforcement agencies.” James Tomsheck, a former head of internal affairs at CBP, tells Quartz that the picture “could be far worse than what the arrest stats show.”
An ill-advised initiative to swell the ranks of Border Patrol agents in the mid-2000s was accompanied by an extraordinary e in misconduct within the agency. Now, the Trump administration is looking to implement another hiring surge.
Trump ordered the Border Patrol, which has just under 20,000 agents, to hire 5,000 brand new ones as “as soon as is practicable.”
Congress declined to fund the surge,
When the CPB similarly ramped up hiring in 2006, under US president George W. Bush, standards were lowered in order to hire about 8,000 additional agents by 2009.
“the number of employees arrested for misconduct, such as civil rights violations or off-duty crimes like domestic violence, grew each year between 2007 and 2012, reaching 336, a 44-percent increase.”
A 2012 report by the US Government Accountability Office said the 2006-2009 hiring surge drew an unknown number of recruits from the criminal underworld who applied for—and received—jobs as border agents and officers “solely to engage in mission-compromising activity.”
For starters, he says,
potential recruits were failing the lie-detector tests at a rate of 55%.
(The failure rate is even higher now.) And according to Tomsheck, more than 30 people confessed to having
applied for a position at someone else’s direction, including that of drug traffickers.
“They very clearly were infiltrators being placed within the ranks to be the eyes and ears of criminal organizations,”
Staffing needs
The Border Patrol faces a current attrition rate of at least 6% a year, which means it would need to hire more than 1,800 agents just to net an additional 500.
To net 5,000 new agents, as Trump had requested, for a staffing total of 26,370 agents, CBP commissioner Kevin McAleenan has estimated the Border Patrol would need 2,729 new recruits annually for five years.
Tomsheck believes rushing to add thousands of new Border Patrol agents to the ranks as quickly as possible is little more than
a piece of political theater that’s doomed to fail.
https://qz.com/1454101/the-us-border...-hiring-again/
Repug MISgovernance, as dictated by Trash/Miller/Kelly as racist political theatre.
Part-time Texas firefighter busted for Facebook post urging shooting of immigrants — and then got fired from all three of his jobs
“We should buy deer feeders fill them with pinto beans put them on the border and
make a new hunting season.
I wonder how many Texans will buy that hunting licenses and
how many tags we would be allowed…”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/par...ed-three-jobs/
Probably a Trash voter who hates govt, but loves govt paying his salary
Good luck finding a job, redneck.
Try the sheriff dept, they hire assholes fired like you were.
This is their reaction to Americans not voting how they want. Imagine if Republicans were importing people to wash out their vote. How would they react? But Republicans are the racists.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
