Share the link please
The Intercept broke the story, if that's what you meant.
Okay it was leaked to the Intercept, not the WaPO. And the Intercept turned it over to the FBI? In short I didn’t see the NYT or WaPO posting actual CIA hacking methods like Wikileaks.
Have you seen The Post?
Does it matter what I think?
Her leaking the info didn't result in anything. What she leaked felt on deaf ears and she got sent to prison for her efforts.
The russians are still laughing.
Not yet I just looked up the synopsis. I’ll check it out.
So not much in the way of precedent.
Let's see what the charges are before making a martyr out of stinky.
No one said stinky is a martyr, but many have pointed out that prosecuting him might have chilling consequences for journalism more generally.
We'll see.
you dodged.
that's ok.
But if everyone is so confident he's be protected by the first amendment, they should welcome those charges. Stinky martyr becomes stinky messiah.
If he's actually gets the chilly charges. No one even knows that.
No, I didn't dodge.
I have no opinion on that matter. I said "in her eyes" in quotes. These are not my own feelings. Perception is not your thing and that's ok.
*Correction
IN BRACKETS!
There are no brackets, dumb ing tranny.
Derp is gonna derp
Enthusiasm for the subsequent investigation but none for the whistleblower?
ok.
By everyone you mean hater.
You aren't confident he would be exonerated if tried for chilly charges?
what are chilly charges?
a good rundown of theories of prosecution can be found here:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/11/1...jason-leopold/
All these articles were talking about chilling effects. So the charges leading to those effects are chilly charges.
Translation: Assange cost Hillary the election. He deserves the chair.
lol derp
I don't think the death penalty would apply to him. You choose Assange over the US though.
Congratulations.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)