Reply With Quote
sorry, man, we're responsible for folks we detain.
wgaf how many resources we have? they're for our citizens and not those entering illegally.
sorry, man, we're responsible for folks we detain.
you're wrong about that.
under US law they have the right to ask for asylum regardless of how they entered the country.
that needs to change... no need to detain when you can give a swift kick to their ass and push them back over the border line.
time to change that broken law since it's been abused for way too long now.
one wonders why Republicans didn't change the law while they had a chance. maybe they didn't care about illegal immigration as much as they pretend to.
possibly. i don't know the inner workings of snakes tbh. they're all snakes on both sides of the aisle.
Facts don't care about your feelings snowflake.
what facts, snowflake?
Asks one of the bigger y whiners here
Lol says dude that constantly posts fake news
What fake news have I posted ITT or even recently? Are you going to keep up this kind of churlish behavior through 2019?
You've posted enough to have a reputation.
Lol but but whatabout "recently"
You'll be posting fake news in 2019, dip .
Lol "constantly posting"
Yup it's sad tbh. You're sad tbh.
What do you think your reputation is?
Maybe because the thread is called Border Security?
I’m pretty sure there was just as much concern in relevant threads.
Spoiler: blaming the victim has worked as well there.
It's sad that you can't back up any of your wild assertions.
What's it like in la hielera?
https://www.thecut.com/amp/2018/12/w...he-border.html
Lol "wild"
So the general opinion in here is that economic migrants "searching for a better life" are OK even if they are uneducated, illiterate, and don't speak English.
So if we completely disregard that they are entering illegally, what is an appropriate annual number that we should allow in? 100,000? A million? Ten Million? 50 million? After all, they are just innocent economic migrants seeking a better life.
I think you’re missing the point entirely by focusing on trying to pin point exact numbers, or qualifications. If we can agree this is primarily an economics problem, then we should be able to discern that the job market will dictate how many of those people will get jobs and an opportunity to improve their situation, and how many of those people are simply going to turn back and go home back to their families (a phenomenon barely talked about, but that also happens).
There’s other non-economic concerns that are completely legitimate too, like securing our border from bad actors, or the fact that illegals clog and make unfair an already bureaucratic and expensive system for legal immigrants. Those are serious concerns that need to be addressed, with both better border security and an integral immigration reform.
Then there’s the war on drugs making securing the border clearly more complicated, the abuses on the current legal visa system, etc. Clearly this is an area that requires a lot of thought because the problem is complicated and the solution requires more than some sort of silver bullet.
Actually, I was pointing out the fallacy of the majority opinion of this forum that "these poor illegal immigrants are just coming here for a better life". I agree with you that the situation is much more complicated.
The majority opinion in the forum however is that economic immigration is fine. I was asking the proponents at what scale is it NOT fine?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
