Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 264
  1. #1
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    I like it


  2. #2
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    19,410
    Taxing the wealthy...... I'm listening

    To pay for climate change..... where's my yellow vest

  3. #3
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    it's not unprecedented. the top tax rate exceeded 70% in the 50's, 60's, 70's

    at least she understands the concept of marginal rates. you'd be surprised how many people dont

  4. #4
    Banned
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Post Count
    143
    Not all Democrats want this. K.

  5. #5
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    it's not unprecedented. the top tax rate exceeded 70% in the 50's, 60's, 70's

    at least she understands the concept of marginal rates. you'd be surprised how many people dont
    Well, that's a feather in her cap. Good thing you point that out.

    Chump Lite

  6. #6
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Well, that's a feather in her cap. Good thing you point that out.

    Chump Lite
    wasn't meant as a compliment... nothing is a given with her.

  7. #7
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    wasn't meant as a compliment... nothing is a given with her.
    Sperm shielding at the end of the day, lite.

  8. #8
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,468
    It should go back to the top marginal rate being north of 90% like it was in the 50s (the time period most conservatives refer to as the good times), but for whatever reason no one remembered that taxing the rich heavily played a huge role in creating a strong middle class.

  9. #9
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    There was a time when the rich were more patriotic and more willing to improve their surrounding communities through large endowments and tax-deductable community development efforts. And that was before they had robotrading and other stock market manipulation options to ensure that they made a lot of money by simply having money.

    These are different times though. And anyway, 70% is too big a jump right now. Baby steps.

  10. #10
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    What is the definition of "rich" that will pay this 70%?

  11. #11
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    4th paragraph of the article.

    "Once you get to the tippie-tops, on your $10 millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60% or 70%. That doesn't mean all $10 million dollars are taxed at an extremely high rate. But it means that as you climb up this ladder, you should be contributing more," Ocasio-Cortez said.

  12. #12
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    What is the definition of "rich" that will pay this 70%?
    Let's just say it's you, moneybags.

  13. #13
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    inb4 "10 million isn't a lot of money"

  14. #14
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    3rd paragraph of the article.
    "Once you get to the tippie-tops, on your $10 millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60% or 70%. That doesn't mean all $10 million dollars are taxed at an extremely high rate. But it means that as you climb up this ladder, you should be contributing more," Ocasio-Cortez said.
    So, Anderson Cooper would just take home 3.6M of his 12M salary? I don't think so. He'd probably renegotiate his salary to 9.9M and get some other kind of financial incentive.

    People still have this fantasy that the rich actually paid 90% in the 1950's, as if there weren't ways to dramatically reduce their tax exposure.

  15. #15
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Let's just say it's you, moneybags.
    have you seen his 401k?

  16. #16
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    So, Anderson Cooper would just take home 3.6M of his 12M salary? I don't think so. He'd probably renegotiate his salary to 9.9M and get some other kind of financial incentive.

    People still have this fantasy that the rich actually paid 90% in the 1950's, as if there weren't ways to dramatically reduce their tax exposure.
    Spurtacular this is what i was saying about people not understanding marginal tax rates

    also darrin, did you not read that ENTIRE 2 sentence quote spurminator provided for you?

  17. #17
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Oh my ing god.

  18. #18
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    on the bright side, he's so exorbitantly wealthy that he doesn't even realize how much he's being taxed

  19. #19
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752

  20. #20
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    this is darrin's best take since he disproved climate change by walking into two different buildings with a thermometer

  21. #21
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    on the bright side, he's so exorbitantly wealthy that he doesn't even realize how much he's being taxed
    I want to be that guy's accountant...

  22. #22
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    I want to be that guy's accountant...
    are we sure darrin shouldn't be suing charles banks?

  23. #23
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    19,410
    There was a time when the rich were more patriotic and more willing to improve their surrounding communities through large endowments and tax-deductable community development efforts. And that was before they had robotrading and other stock market manipulation options to ensure that they made a lot of money by simply having money.

    These are different times though. And anyway, 70% is too big a jump right now. Baby steps.
    That time was when America was prwdominately White. If Poland was flooded by ethnics I would close myself off to a neighborhood mindset too

    The new America is at best different and for most - increasingly undesirable. Why fund it?

  24. #24
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    on the bright side, he's so exorbitantly wealthy that he doesn't even realize how much he's being taxed
    For last year

    tax paid: 132,490
    39.6% tax bracket
    27.29% effective tax rate

    I'm painfully aware how much I'm being taxed.

  25. #25
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    are we sure darrin shouldn't be suing charles banks?
    This Charles Banks?

    https://www.winespectator.com/webfea...-to-Four-Years

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •