In my original post, I made the term "need" contingent upon the wants of the party I am not even part of. I do not agree with your use of the word "should". I think it's sloppy. Something that is contingent isn't a "should" it's a "need", as should implies "ought to" while need implies "must". Your example would be true if I was giving advice.. "If you want to get your license, you should study" but I wasn't "If a person wants to pass their exam, they need to study" is more of an observation, not advice. "Ought to" is usually advice. It implies "I wish you would" but I don't have any such wishes for the democratic party.
Either way, Chump intentionally disregarded the fact that the term was contingent upon the wants of the democratic party and instead tried to spin it to represent a contradiction where one simply did not exist. He seems to hate it when someone won't play his yes or no game so he has to select for you.