God you're dumb.
Pay attention to what items at stores have security tags.
It ain't soap.![]()
He should be. Mueller had all the tools of counter-intelligence at his disposal during the investigation. Stone faces up to 45 years in the hoosegow.
Gotta hurt for red team that Roger Stone was the first person indicted over HER EMAILS.
^mental masturbation
(key word:mental)
it's a direct reply to you.
your inability to carry a topical conversation is showing again.
I agree with the author of what I'm about to post that Trump is a crook, a liar, a racist, a fascistic demagogue and a contemptible swine. But as Nina Illingworth points out in her series, the corporate media have done a strikingly shoddy job of reporting on Russiagate.
Worth a read in my opinion.
http://www.ninaillingworth.com/2019/...gion-part-two/Editor’s note: this is Part Two in what I believe will be a five part series about corporate media corrections, retractions and walk-backs while covering the truly bizarre “Russiagate” saga; you can find Part One here.
Before we get started however, I would like to emphatically state that this article is not intended to serve as any sort of defense on behalf of US swine emperor Donald Trump; a man who I have identified in previous articles as a fascist, a rapist, acrook, a warmonger and a liar. This series is merely focusing on the disturbingly large number of misreported, or in some cases outright fabricated, “Russia” stories in US corporate media over the past twenty-eight months; stories with terrifying national security and foreign policy implications, and released by professional media outlets that should be held to a higher standardof professional conduct than they seemingly have been.
Roger Stone ed himself by keeping the receipts:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/01/2...ucked-himself/
What's fake?
Illingsworth doesn't' defend Trump for so much as a single sentence in either part of the article
There have been a ton of mistakes and retractions in the reporting. That's fact, not propaganda.
If you can't acknowledge it, you lack objectivity.
If you have factual issues with something she said, by all means, point it out and correct it.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-26-2019 at 10:17 AM.
You failed to lodge a single factual complaint. Pure name-calling, but that's what you do.
It's an intellectual weakness in every ideological quarter to accept reporting amenable to one's biases as factual and unimpeachable without any scrutiny whatsoever.
The fact that you're willing to overlook retractions puts the lie to your probity.
It's not a conspiracy to point out the trend of the mistakes. One would expect a random distribution of errors in bona fide reporting, but the trend isn't random.
I trust the investigation way more than the reporting, but for you the reporting is a convenient club to beat the President and his party, so you overlook its revealed flaws.
This is such a desperate and limp- attempt to troll I'm not even going to try to reason with you.
You're derp now. Congrats.
The big inheritance syndrome.
A sub category of, "I'm ok, you're ok"
I don't really see what transactional analysis has to do with it, but I think I see what you mean.
What's big inheritance syndrome?
Silver Spoon kids don't always see the plight of others.
As long as they are OK, the rest of the world must be.
Trump said people will find a way during the shut down and they did so it's all cool. No problems.
Stone continues to talk to the press. His frankness about his conversations in 2016 with the President -- who was mentioned by name in Stone's indictment -- seems calculated to ruffle his feathers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...5f4_story.html
Stone is facing 45 years in the clink. A bid for a pardon by seeming the loose cannon might look like his best bet.
After going into hiding when the latest Cohen fake news he pimped was slapped down by Mueller that little djohn2oo8 tries to come back with proof of Trump/Russia collusion and is smacked down yet again
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/26/u....co/27wrHzKC5E
djohn
it hasn't even been two years yet, TSA. ordinary criminal prosecutions often take as long or longer.
compared to Walsh and Starr the pace has been brisk: 90 indictments. both of those other investigations took longer than five years.
Mueller teasing you - like a master!
Traitors breathlessly awaiting the smoking gun!
Doesn't matter which crimes your hero traitors are indicted for - you will defend treason either way.
Your country is going to hold all the traitors accountable.
There is no treason to defend.
Honestly would you expect Mueller to lead with conspiracy charges against Trump campaign officials as his first indictments?
Can you point me to the indictment concerning Trump/Russia election collusion. Thanks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)