oh i catch plenty. i am not an avid watcher of said networks but i catch plenty from most outlets. it's how you get to know your opposition and their tactics.
And you're whining that he gets media coverage.
kori
oh i catch plenty. i am not an avid watcher of said networks but i catch plenty from most outlets. it's how you get to know your opposition and their tactics.
So you were lying then.![]()
who's whining? not i. i'm simply stating that your false idols report on trump but just trump and not much of anything else. maybe they should all just report to tmz already because they're all hacks to begin with.
And CNN constantly uses Trump, Maga, and rednecks to trigger you.
Anyway, I'm not getting sucked into another loop of your perceived clever rhetoric.
You've already had to apologize to me once. It was a pretty empty victory considering the 5 minutes of my time that was wasted.
i never claimed i don't see "news". i simply never stated what outlets. i keep up with you mentally unstable masses just so i can better understand who yall are.
of course they report on other things.
You're being pretty stupid, kori.
What "should" get reported is rarely the determinant for 24 hour news stations. At least from an informational standpoint. From a business standpoint, I'm sure CNN/Fox have it dialed in.
When did I apologize?
Did I think you were some other poster or something?
So I do understand how media works. I demand an apology.
What's all this about CNN covering rednecks?
of course they do, i never said they didn't. the majority of it is bs though and has nothing to do with us citizens, our nation, or policies in place nor those waiting in the wings. you act like you have no clue but you do this because you're part of the problem and anything to mask the issue is better than confronting it head on. i get it; your side is totally weak.
Quit talking about muh Trump!
I'm not going to look for it. It was maybe a couple of weeks ago.
And I graciously accepted the apology.
Great.
What are your news outlets that everyone should be following to be as well informed and balanced as you are, kori?
Sounds like bull .
Where's my apology?
no one is claiming such nonsense but the tabloid angle that "news" has taken on in the last 20-30 yrs is something you can't deny even though you're trying so hard to do atm.
Great.
What are your news outlets that everyone should be following to be as well informed and balanced as you are, kori?
So we’re in agreement that Fox covers AOC as much as it does because it’s the right business decision to attract triggered conservative viewers.
(before bringing up CNN, I don’t disagree that CNN overcovers sensationalist news and often ignored the stuff that matters, but the fact the most powerful man in the world is often front and center on CNN isn’t much of an issue imo)
idk about supplying anyone with anything political. i just don't care to and why should i? i'm not trying to convince any of yall of anything and i read for myself and myself only. the internet is vast so just read left & right and then figure out your place in this world but it's not my job to hold your hand.
NO COVERAGE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST EQUAL THE COVERAGE OF A FIRST-TERM HOUSE REP FROM THE BRONX
this is why you're a joke, kori.
You talk big but you're full of and you show it every time you get called out.
I called you out and you're running away again, tough guy.
Yes...I'd agree with that.
And I get your point about why Trump should be covered. But the way that he's covered by CNN is certainly not unbiased.
But my guess is that before he was even president, he was getting more or equal CNN coverage than Clinton. And surely more than someone like Nancy Pelosi.
In your mom's butt.
But you're welcome to search using SpursTalk excellent search feature. Just look for posts by you that contain "sorry". It should be pretty recent.
I won't wait for you.
oh ...Captian Badass has arrived.
Is that exclusive to CNN though? From really on in his campaign he said outrageous stuff for shock value and the media took the bait every time giving him extensively more media coverage than any other candidate.
Regarding Pelosi, she was in a completely powerless position up until last month. Since she’s taken over as speaker of the house the coverage she’s been getting has undoubtedly increased.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)