I'm only here for the mildly entertaining posts.
If you want real political debates, watch IQ^2 debates on youtube.
Or here https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org
THIS PLACE WAS A PEARL ON A SATIN PILLOW!
I'm only here for the mildly entertaining posts.
If you want real political debates, watch IQ^2 debates on youtube.
Or here https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org
Ive lost quite a bit of weight since then.
you think that’s bad, there’s literally millions of Alex Jones listeners who claim (with zero evidence) that there are 50+ million illegals in the US
Jesus would be considered a Putin Russian puppet by Democraps today tbqh
I hope that's a good thing, TB.
(Drugs, disease and divorce being the usual culprits.)
Certainly reduced my satin pillow. LOL
Libertarians constantly try to qualify the difference between capitalism and “crony capitalism” but they can’t logically explain how “limited government” will lead to the elimination of crony capitalism or why crony capitalism has only gotten more out of control as there’s been more deregulation.
Im also never going to understand why Libertarians claim that they want as little interraction between the public and private sector as possible yet they support the Citizens United SCOTUS ruling. It’s a blatant contradiction they can’t ever explain.
And JFK would be considered a right wing extremist by today's left
Explain.
on a completely unrelated tangent, this thumbnail schema of kinds of stupidity is a good reminder that intelligence and advanced specialization aren't necessarily proof against it.
there's much more to life than being right, online or anywhere else.
https://www.collaborativefund.com/bl...nds-of-stupid/
Another DarrinS drive by.
He seldom circles back to unpack his own comments, but that's probably smart: his ratio of self-immolating takes is very high.
I’m guessing this has something to do with tax cuts and howtoday’s Liberals don’t support anyone who cuts taxes
. IIRC it was either Darrin or that Yonivore re who tried to argue before that today’s Liberals would hate JFK for his tax cuts.
Of course, that’d be a stupid argument to make that ignores how cutting the top marginal rate from 91% to 70% and the corporate tax rate from 52% to 48% (what JFK did) is completely different from cutting the top marginal rate from 39.6% to 37% while eliminating deductions that primarily benefited the middle class, and also cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 22%, with no plan on how the tax cuts would be paid for (what Trump did).
It also ignores the fact that the top marginal rate under JFKs plan (70%) is the same top marginal rate that one of the party’s most progressive figures (AOC) is advocating for, but has stupid ever stopped Darrin before?
So, you're not.
And if JFK was around today the Sean Hannitys, Fox News, and Daily Wires would demonize him and pretend hes a dangerous, womanizing piece of
Not what?
I've voted for Republicans and Democrats in the past. I'll consider voting for Republicans again when they stop trying to take the vote away from American citizens who have done nothing wrong.
Dennis Prager. Certainly wouldn’t be biased on the matter
That wasn't Dennis Prager. It was Larry Elder.
Darrin will never back up an argument himself.
So any thoughts on the matter yourself or just a youtube video?
For wanting a 65% top tax rate? So 5 points is the difference between right winger and socialist nutcase?
The actual tax plan he passed ended up at 70% iirc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)