Reply With Quote
It's almost as if the teabaggers are a white iden y movement.
It's almost as if the teabaggers are a white iden y movement.
It's Cohen who's testifying - not the Repug.
Meadows must just be outraged beyond belief that Jared Cuckner - did this same violation
86
times!!!!!
I believe him, but don't know how he proves any of his statements, unfortunately.
DMC also claimed the US census doesn't count "iilegals"
Strikingly ignorant for such a smart idiot.
Spurs Homer's evident idiocy totally notwithstanding, you're an idiot if you think Michael Cohen wasn't Trump's legal myrmidon until he got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
Probably Miami Beach JewsCant believe debbie wasser s is still around
After she threw election against bern
What's wrong with Miami Beach Jews?
da jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
Although I think you're trying to remove culpability from Cohen as if he's gullible, I don't think that detracts from anything I said.
the closet anti-Semite comes out
Being undo ented, there's no way to know if they are legal or not without requiring citizenship evidence. Therefore there is no "illegal immigrant" category in the US Census.
You're another of the "infer without asking" group who prefers your own narrative over dialogue.
The 2010 census asked the following ten questions:
How many people were living or staying in this house, apartment, or mobile home on April 1, 2010?
Were there any additional people staying here April 1, 2010 that you did not include in Question 1?
Is this house, apartment, or mobile home: owned with mortgage, owned without mortgage, rented, occupied without rent?
What is your telephone number?
Please provide information for each person living here. Start with a person here who owns or rents this house, apartment, or mobile home. If the owner or renter lives somewhere else, start with any adult living here. This will be Person 1. What is Person 1's name?
What is Person 1's sex?
What is Person 1's age and Date of Birth?
Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?
What is Person 1's race?
Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else?
How do these question equate to "counting" anyhow? You could list however many people you want, or omit everyone.
"i'm not racist, look at my black friend"
That was some cringeworthy .
Translation:
"Counting, how does that work?"
I would not have figured you for a Juggalo. Moved on from the great magnet mystery, I guess.
Saw her questioning. No grandstanding, no lecturing. Just hammered away narrowly at what she wanted.Apparently ma noga Ocasio Cotez got in 5 minutes what Muller and the entire FBI couldnt get in 2 years
Case closed
Concise and smart. I haven't read much else in the last few pages, but have little doubt that some conservative will parrot the "dumb" trope that the right-wing propaganda machine has settled on. Any mention of AOC invariably brings this up as a knee-jerk response, like a dog fetching a stick, and proudly dropping it at your feet, as if it is some sort of accomplishment, "look I can say and think exactly what I am told to" (ding?)
Things like that don't fit into that narrative.
Not disappointed. Good dog.
Pearl clutching at the slimyness, greed, and corruption of someone who worked for the president for 10 years. Yet Trump kept him on, and he stayed.
Almost as if there was some "tone at the top" of that relationship that created an environment for that to fester in.
"allconjecture and speculation" is laughable. Prosecutors had him dead to rights, with all sorts of do entary evidence that would likely still be relevant. This lawyer looked at the evidence against him, and decided his case was a losing one, and confessed entirely.
I'm sure they made it all up, and were only guessing about him lying.
The problem of course, is that the evidence and testimony Cohen can provide proves Trump is a criminal several times over.
1) Conspiracy to defraud the United States. Cohen confirmed that Trump knew ahead of time about the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.
2) Lying to the FBI and the Department of Justice. In his letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Trump claimed that he did not know about the release of hacked emails. That was a lie, according to Cohen.
3) Encouraging perjury. Cohen testified that Trump encouraged him to lie to Congress.
4) Campaign finance violations. Trump ordered Cohen to pay off his mistress in order to keep information about their affair from going public -- a clear violation of campaign finance laws.
5) Tax fraud. Cohen testified that Trump devalued his assets in order pay less in state and local taxes.
I will take her seriously when she puts a cost on her green dream and explains exactly how she plans to pay for it. Until then I am well within my right to call it stupid . If you want to add 50 -93 Trillion dollars of programs over the next ten years that is a reasonable request.
Not disappointed. Good dog.
Last edited by CosmicCowboy; 02-28-2019 at 08:05 AM.
Trump Org about to undergo a deep examination that will make shady execs ‘household names’
he believed President Donald Trump had committed insurance fraud and he listed Trump Organization executives who would know more about such schemes.
Axios’ Jonathan Swan reports that Cohen’s revelations will give Congress all the justification it needs to launch a deep probe into the Trump Organization for the first time.
Swan believes that things are about to get very uncomfortable for top Trump Organization executives Allen Weisselberg, Ron Lieberman, and Matthew Calamari.
“Unless you’re a student of The Trump Organization — the thinly-staffed Trump family business — you may never have heard of
Weisselberg,
Lieberman or
Calamari,”
Swan writes.
“But over the next year, these men and their colleagues may become household names as they endure
a far-reaching, multi-armed investigation into Trump’s family business and personal finances.”
“This organization has never had a proctology exam like it’s about to get,” he said.
“It’s going to surface records that’s going to become problematic for all of them to keep their stories straight.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/tru...e+Raw+Story%29
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-28-2019 at 08:29 AM.
But he wasn't testifying about his own indiscretions, those were already known. He went to great lengths to paint himself as misled. I have no idea what you're even talking about.
I think we should have all new streets with hoverboards and everyone should have a beach front home in their neighborhood.
Anytime you want to compare career or academic notes, let me know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
