Cohen Promises Testimony Willl be Explosive

[Will Hunting]

It's his pathetic schtick. It's all he's got.

Doesn’t seem like a shtick. He seems genuinely angry

[DMC]

Doesn’t seem like a shtick. He seems genuinely angry

Beetus

[Will Hunting]

Beetus

[DMC]

[Will Hunting]

I really wish CNN didn't give a platform to corrupt Democrats like Bob Menendez.

[Fabbs]

I really wish CNN didn't give a platform to corrupt Democrats like Bob Menendez.

Did you say something upline about more hearings today?
Schiff?

[CosmicCowboy]

Pathetic? You know what’s pathetic, and evil, molesting innocent children

Like I said. Your pathetic make believe schtick, transferring your sick fantasies to others.

[hater]

I really wish CNN didn't give a platform to corrupt Democrats like Bob Menendez.

You sound surprised this is the same network that handed put jobs to corrupt Brennan, Clapper, etc

[boutons_deux]

Did you say something upline about more hearings today?
Schiff?

security hearing, closed

[boutons_deux]

How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Won the Cohen Hearing


https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproje...n-hearing.html

[CosmicCowboy]

How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Won the Cohen Hearing


https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproje...n-hearing.html

copy and paste the text. I'm not going to pay to read the NYT.

[RandomGuy]

How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Won the Cohen Hearing


https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproje...n-hearing.html

Eyup. What is funny is that the all Cortez channel, aka Fox "news" won't be airing her questions.

I would be willing to bet people like Cosmicowboy haven't even seen it.

[CitizenDwayne]

how else can you continue on a false narrative that both sides are the same

Good point

[RandomGuy]

copy and paste the text. I'm not going to pay to read the NYT.

She kept it quick and to the point, finishing before her time was up, and yielded back the balance of her time.

[RandomGuy]

Democrats: We are concerned the president may have committed treason, bank fraud, tax fraud, charity fraud, laundered money for Russian mobsters and committed campaign finance violations.

Republicans: We are worried Michael Cohen may get a book deal.



I think that sums up the entire day's worth of testimony.

[RandomGuy]

Also Republicans: I can't believe Cohen when he says Trump is a crook, because he was convicted of lying to congress when he told them Trump isn't a crook.



You just can't make this up. It is self parody of the most unselfaware sort.

[DMC]

Also Republicans: I can't believe Cohen when he says Trump is a crook, because he was convicted of lying to congress when he told them Trump isn't a crook.

Everyone here knows Trump is a crook. They also know Cohen is a crook. You seem to lack critical reasoning skills to understand plausible deniability. Accusations from a convicted liar about to serve prison time are just reasons to investigate, not smoking guns.

[DMC]

Democrats: We are concerned the president may have committed treason, bank fraud, tax fraud, charity fraud, laundered money for Russian mobsters and committed campaign finance violations.

Republicans: We are worried Michael Cohen may get a book deal.



I think that sums up the entire day's worth of testimony.

No.

Democrats: We believe Cohen will say things we can use to enter into impeachment discussions which would really help us in 2020.

Stop pretending any of this is about the nation or justice of any kind. Surely you're not that ing childish and naive.

[CitizenDwayne]

Everyone here knows Trump is a crook. They also know Cohen is a crook. You seem to lack critical reasoning skills to understand plausible deniability. Accusations from a convicted liar about to serve prison time are just reasons to investigate, not smoking guns.

Not everyone here thinks he’s a crook, or should be investigated. You shouldn’t speak for your less rational comrades

[DMC]

Not everyone here thinks he’s a crook, or should be investigated. You shouldn’t speak for your less rational comrades

I didn't say they would admit it. They all know he's a crook though. They just don't care. They didn't elect him to be a beacon of virtuosity. This is what the left doesn't seem to understand. Customer friendly /= effective customer service.

[TSA]

The problem of course, is that the evidence and testimony Cohen can provide proves Trump is a criminal several times over.

1) Conspiracy to defraud the United States. Cohen confirmed that Trump knew ahead of time about the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.

2) Lying to the FBI and the Department of Justice. In his letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Trump claimed that he did not know about the release of hacked emails. That was a lie, according to Cohen.

3) Encouraging perjury. Cohen testified that Trump encouraged him to lie to Congress.

4) Campaign finance violations. Trump ordered Cohen to pay off his mistress in order to keep information about their affair from going public -- a clear violation of campaign finance laws.

5) Tax fraud. Cohen testified that Trump devalued his assets in order pay less in state and local taxes.

You tried this yesterday and were shot down.

1) lol no. Assange announced in June, Cohen said he heard in July. Also see Mueller’s statement of offense for Corsi where Corsi was forced to admit he had no back channel with Wikileaks. Corsi has no back channel therefore Stone had no back channel therefore Trump had no back channel.

2) see 1. The whole back channel thing is total bull . Mueller never indicted nor even mentioned anyone having a back channel to Wikileaks.

3) false, Cohen testified Trump did not direct him to lie

4) not a clear violation of campaign finance law violatio as Trump has paid off women to kill stories before the campaign so it would have been done regardless of campaign. Cohen also testified he killed the fake Melania abuse tape story.

5) When asked for proof Cohen had no evidence

[RandomGuy]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oca... ents-assets

Fox did indeed post the footage, with a factual, dry article.

One would be very hard pressed to find it on their website though. Lots of breathless coverage over some cheeseburger photo. Above link nowhere to be found.

Commentary was what one might expect. "who wrote that for her, she is too dumb to come up with them herself".

None of the talking head opinion pieces talk about the questions she asked. It's almost as if Fox "News" doesn't want to delve into the subject closely.

[TSA]

You tried this yesterday and were shot down.

1) lol no. Assange announced in June, Cohen said he heard in July. Also see Mueller’s statement of offense for Corsi where Corsi was forced to admit he had no back channel with Wikileaks. Corsi has no back channel therefore Stone had no back channel therefore Trump had no back channel.

2) see 1. The whole back channel thing is total bull . Mueller never indicted nor even mentioned anyone having a back channel to Wikileaks.

3) false, Cohen testified Trump did not direct him to lie

4) not a clear violation of campaign finance law violatio as Trump has paid off women to kill stories before the campaign so it would have been done regardless of campaign. Cohen also testified he killed the fake Melania abuse tape story.

5) When asked for proof Cohen had no evidence

[RandomGuy]

You seem to lack critical reasoning skills to understand plausible deniability.

I am pretty sure I understand plausible deniability.

Feel free to outline what specifically you think I am missing. Provide a working definition, and then find what specifically in my statements shows a lack of understanding.

If you are really concerned about good critical thinking skills, you will personally try to help others with theirs. Otherwise, I would have to conclude you don't care about critical thinking skills.

[DMC]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oca... ents-assets

Fox did indeed post the footage, with a factual, dry article.

One would be very hard pressed to find it on their website though. Lots of breathless coverage over some cheeseburger photo. Above link nowhere to be found.

Commentary was what one might expect. "who wrote that for her, she is too dumb to come up with them herself".

None of the talking head opinion pieces talk about the questions she asked. It's almost as if Fox "News" doesn't want to delve into the subject closely.

Nothing said yesterday changed your opinion on Trump or any other GOP member. Working from that angle, what exactly to you have, really?