150% agree on Kamala
Her infrastructure dismantled itself, it's what always happens after campaigns end, even when the candidate has magical Clinton powers. The people who worked for her campaign moved on with their lives, and it's not like they're waiting at the edge of their seat ready to return to empress Hillary.
$1000 she doesn't run. Sound good?
150% agree on Kamala
who cares? beto is a like a few here that like to harp on me. all the same caliber of weak men.
shutup sissy
you're one of them tbh
You make it sound like the Hillary camp retired to Timbuktuthey are all still in politics and controling the DNC
If Biden/Kagala/Betacus all flame out she will be back
- Booker is a laughingstock. He won’t do
- Kamala is a possibility, still wouldn’t rule her out completely
- Biden might go for it, he still polls well even though no one really is excited for a Biden presidency
- Clinton’s done. Absolutely 0% chance of running
I personally don’t think Beto is “the next Obama” as some have claimed. He peaked largely due to opposing the least likable politician this nation has ever produced, and now seems kinda quaint compared to a lot of these big, well-oiled political machines. Just don’t see it
Hes an obama lite clone
Id still vote for him over Trump, Kagala, Betacus, Hillary, Biden
that's the only thing that really counts. Kamala Harris winning by an extra 4 points in California (64%) than Sherrod Brown's 60% doesn't. considering Kamala would get smoked in the rust belt and likely lose FL, too. Not enough EC points.
Yeah I’d personally prefer him to them, but I just can’t envision him outlasting Biden or Bernie
I prefer Bernie out of the lot, just ftr
who tf is Betacus?
you prefer communism and a pos who tried to help countries topple our own. ing unbelievable!
The concern would be that he wins the rust belt back but puts the states where Dems heavily rely on a minority population up for grabs (Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, etc.). Same thing with Bernie imo. He probably wins the rust belt back but not sure if he beats Trump in a state like Virginia in 2016.
Dems have been smart so far in that Schumer is trying to arrange good candidates for senate in key races. Getting Gabby Giffords' husband to run against McSally was a brilliant idea. Abrams needs to run in Georgia and Julian Castro needs drop the presidency pipe dream and run against Cornyn in Texas. No one comes to mind yet but they need to start looking at candidates in Iowa/North Carolina/Maine/Colorado.
Look up his “Spartacus moment” if you’ve not seen it, it’s cringeworthy af
So sort of like a 2004 map, I get it.
But there are more voting Hispanics than there were back then, and don't forget in 2004 Bush won 40% of the Hispanic vote. With all the wall and deport, kill, separate families business he (Trump) won't crack 30% of the Hispanic vote in those states.
Tulsi, Bernie in that order IMo
Did Beto make fun of you too?
So if it came down to Biden and Trump, would you vote?
Meh, even if you're right at a high level, there's still candidates she can control other than those 3. Gillibrand, Beto, Klobuchar and Warren imo could all be co-opted as Clinton shills.
Sanders and Brown are the only two who held truly progressive ideals before 2016.
Probably not. Unless Biden somehow sqys aomething worth a (doubtful)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)