The Dwight Clark evidence to end all evidence with no more response etc.

[Blake]

You're done for good now, old fat man.

Just say okay okay I was wrong, the court was right I'll move on back in my basement under the carport now and listen to blues of the 1920s by myself.

[Avant]

Blake, there was never any debate he lined up at TE sometimes, I mentioned that when this all started. BUT....look at what the card lists him as, yep.....WIDE RECEIVER. (did you even see that?)

The court said he was a TE, not a WR/TE....right? Dude, right there on that card...WIDE RECEIVER....why? Yep, he was WIDE RECEIVER.

I'm thinking the guy didn't even see WIDE RECEIVER.

I think this should put an end to this, the court was wrong as we just saw, not TE but...WIDE RECEIVER.

See that 16.9 avg in 1984? What TE averages 16.9 in a season? Who?

George Kittle broke all kinds of TE records last season, one of them was that single season yards records of 965 yards held by Vernon Davis, well if Clark was a TE then that 1105 from 81 would have been the record, why wasn't it, yep....Clark was just like that card said a...WIDE RECEIVER.

I think I'll mix a little AA and cherry Coke, maybe toss in some red hots. Light some candles and incense sticks, kick back and chill out in my Fortress of Solitude with some vintage Robert Johnson., hate them Hounds.





Blake, you didn't notice that WIDE RECEIVER did ya?

This was an easy win, wish Blake had put up a better fight.

Dwight Clark just like Blake showed us....WIDE RECEIVER.


Little people stick to what ya know, obviously track/football ain't it.

Rookies sheesh~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Chucho]

That moldy shack is a "fortress" the way you are 275 lbs of twisted steel.

[Avant]

That moldy shack is a "fortress" the way you are 275 lbs of twisted steel.

translation

Damn Blake, what were you thinking man? You didn't notice WIDE RECEIVER? Dude, ya ed up.

[Avant]

If we turn that card over we see this...




The only place we see his position was on the back with that.......WIDE RECEIVER.

So much for was he a TE, as we can see that is over.

And when it comes to a WR/TE.....who was ever called that?

TE Jimmy Graham lines up all over the place, and there was even talk about him wanting WR money, but.........he is never ever called WR.

Dwight Clark had a 13.3 career average per catch, what TE has a 13.3 average for a career, not Gonzalez, Witten, Winslow, Sharpe, Gates. That is a WR avg.


Remember when it was......but who cares?

[Avant]

Dwight Clark Stats | Pro-Football-Reference.com


https://www.pro-football-reference.com › Players › C

Dwight Clark: Pos: WR, Career: 134 G, 48 TD, All-Pro(1st), 2xProBowl, 49ers 1979-1987, 1x Rec Leader, born NC 1957, died 2018.High School‎: ‎Garinger (NC)

See....Pos: WR

The guy was never a TE, always a WR who once in a great while came in tight.

[GAustex]

CLark might have been the slowest wide out ever. That dude for Baltimore (he was a coach), in that era may have been slower. Max McGee was slower maybe...Boyd Dowler also.
Ditka, John Mackey were tight ends in that era. Mackey was pretty good...
Bob Hayes now he was fast...

[Blake]

Blake says Dwight Clark's position was WR/TE.

So does Topps.

I'll leave you to ramble on in senile old man fashion now for another 50+ pages about how everyone else is wrong and you're right

[Avant]

CLark might have been the slowest wide out ever. That dude for Baltimore (he was a coach), in that era may have been slower. Max McGee was slower maybe...Boyd Dowler also.
Ditka, John Mackey were tight ends in that era. Mackey was pretty good...
Bob Hayes now he was fast...

Ray Berry that Baltimore coach, was as good as it got, but....slow. He was way before Clark.

Boyd Dowler was not slow, he was actually a track hurdler, yep on Max McGee.

John Mackey was incredible, the first GREAT TE. Ditka just a notch below but he was great. The first two TE's in the HOF.

Bullet Bob Hayes, is STILL the fastest player to ever play pro football, he would blow by guys today just like he did in his day.

Tyreek Hill has ran a 10.19 but HS, so let's give him a 10.08. Bullet Bob ran a 10.06 on a shoddy dirt track over 50 years ago.

[Avant]

So does Topps.

I'll leave you to ramble on in senile old man fashion now for another 50+ pages about how everyone else is wrong and you're right

Blake, nobody ever disputed that the guy plays some TE, ok? I saw him do it, ok? The thing was he played the WR position, not TE.

Dude, do you really think a Niner fan wouldn't know this stuff? I never missed any game in his career, I;m going to know where he plays, ya reckon?

You'll leave me because ya got your butt kicked.

Rookies sheesh~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[spurraider21]

your honor, i move to admit the following admission into evidence

Blake, nobody ever disputed that the guy plays some TE, ok? I saw him do it, ok?

[Avant]

your honor, i move to admit the following admission into evidence

Also add....


See........................WIDE RECEIVER

[Avant]

Speaking of WR which we are with Dwight Clark.

The first really great combo was on the old Browns back in their AAFC days. This was Mac Speedie and Hall of Famer to be Dante Lavelle, with Otto Graham tossing the ball. Now add the great Marion Motley at fullback another HOF.

The Rams had Tom Fears and "Crazy Legs" Hirsch in the 50's, both in the HOF.


What gets me, is it's pretty obvious I know football, so why would anyone challenge me? A known Niner fan doesn't know where Dwight Clark played?

[Will Hunting]

Blake, there was never any debate he lined up at TE sometimes

If he lined up at tight end that would mean he played tight end.

[Avant]

[Avant]

Who can show me any of his cards where we read,,...TIGHT END....as his position?

Hint....there aren't any, the reason....he was a....WIDE RECEIVER.

[Blake]

Blake, there was never any debate he lined up at TE sometimes, I mentioned that when this all started.

Blake, show me one game where Clark played TE, ok?

Perjury

[Blake]

Who can show me any of his cards where we read,,...TIGHT END....as his position?

Hint....there aren't any, the reason....he was a....WIDE RECEIVER.

Post #1 of this thread, freak.

[Avant]

Perjury

My God guy.

Work with me here slugger.

Right off the bat I told you he came in tight but it was rare, why act like you don't remember that? BUT....he never ever started the game as that Niner TE with somebody else at his WR position, does this really need to be explained to you....wow~~~~~~~~~

Dude, every game in every video we see ...WR Dwight Clark....when they show the starters, we never see....TE Dwight Clark....ok man?

[Avant]

Post #1 of this thread, freak.

No freak, we see....WIDE RECEIVER....as it position. Are you blind?

Dude, talking about how he can play both doesn't change the fact his position was a.........WIDE RECEIVER.....just like the card says.

[Avant]

Work with me here people.

Every player has his position and gets paid accordingly. Dwight Clark never made TE money he made WR money. He averaged over 13 yards a catch for his career, what TE can say that?

YES YES YES YES.......as I said long ago, there were a few plays in that offense that had him in tight, but......that doesn't mean his new position was TE....OK? What rewrite his deal?

When that multi talented cat in New Orleans (what the is his name) comes in at QB and Brees heads out wide, what.....Drew Brees is a WR?

Moving into another position for a play or two doesn't change what you are, what your pay rate is.

I did assume all this was more than obvious, guess not.

[Chucho]

Larry losing cases like Bill Cosby.

[Avant]

Larry losing cases like Bill Cosby.

Chucho, ya didn't read anything did ya? This is over Blake ed up, and knows it.

It has been proven that Clark was a WIDE RECEIVER and not a TE. If you'd actually read anything you'd know this.

[Chucho]

Chucho, ya didn't read anything did ya? This is over Blake ed up, and knows it.

It has been proven that Clark was a WIDE RECEIVER and not a TE. If you'd actually read anything you'd know this.

If you read anything in any of these threads, you would know you lost this argument, this case and the vote.

[Avant]

If you read anything in any of these threads, you would know you lost this argument, this case and the vote.

Dude, you think kids can run a 20.00, hahahaha~~~~~~~

No Chucho, this...Avant must lose....isn't working, ALL the evidence proves without a doubt Clark was a WR. There is nothing that has him as a TE as his position.....nothing.

Find anything that shows Clark with TE being his position, come on let's see it.

See....WIDE RECEIVER?