Mueller Delivers Report on Russia Investigation to Attorney General

[Trainwreck2100]

How is Mueller compromised?

i should have said conflicted

[Trainwreck2100]

The part of this thread that actually is Hillary related is the fact that this should be the final dagger in the coffin of any argument that she was cheated in 2016. It's now more clear than it already was (and it was already clear) that she lost fair and square.

hey but now we're gonna get that hillary special council we were promised right?

[boutons_deux]

The part of this thread that actually is Hillary related is the fact that this should be the final dagger in the coffin of any argument that she was cheated in 2016. It's now more clear than it already was (and it was already clear) that she lost fair and square.

bull , Comey trashed her twice, violated FBI protocol, and incl 10 days before the election which Silver said cost her the 3 states that won the EC for Trash. She won PV by 2.8M votes.

[benefactor]

djohn gon cry in the car tbh

[Spurtacular]

i should have said conflicted

He's an utter professional, and his character is unimpugnable. Remember?

[Spurtacular]

Cuck factor quoting himself. Par.

[Trainwreck2100]

He's an utter professional, and his character is unimpugnable. Remember?

i was simply quoting the fuhrer.

[Spurtacular]

bull , Comey trashed her twice, violated FBI protocol, and incl 10 days before the election which Silver said cost her the 3 states that won the EC for Trash. She won PV by 2.8M votes.

There's an FBI protocol to hide simple truth from the electorate?

boy

[Spurtacular]

i was simply quoting the fuhrer.

Two years to come up with a donut. Sad.

[Trainwreck2100]

Two years to come up with a donut. Sad.

Are you saying russia didn't interfere in the election?

[Reck]

Donna spear chucking n!gger Brazile
citing one of the biggest Clinton lapdogs in the Democratic Party

Typical response when faced with a fact.

BTW, that lapdog is now working for Fox News. you

[boutons_deux]

What Barr’s Letter Says About Coming Fight With Lawmakers Over Mueller’s Report

Barr indicated that he wasn’t necessarily prepared to turn the whole report over to Congress.

This could frustrate lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have indicated that

they want to see not just the report itself,

but the underlying evidence.

Barr specifically brought up the presence of grand jury materials in Mueller’s report, which was submitted to the attorney general on Friday.

Under the law, such material can’t be made public. ( Congress is "public" )

He added that information in the report could “impact other ongoing matters”

that Mueller farmed out to U.S. Attorney’s Offices around the country.

he acknowledged, the “public interest in this matter” while vowing to release as much information as is allowed legally and under DOJ policy.

no clear timeframe for when a redacted version of the report might be released.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckra...0%28TPMNews%29

[Winehole23]

OJ Simpson couldn't be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's an exoneration, right?

[boutons_deux]

Trump Calls For An Investigation Into Democrats After Mueller Findings

Trump immediately twisted the Mueller finding into a false claim that Democrats broke the law and must be investigated.

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/03/24/trump-investigate-democrats.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=fe ed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Pol iticus+USA+%29

[Spurtacular]

Are you saying russia didn't interfere in the election?

In a material way? Not that I've seen.

[Will Hunting]

Typical response when faced with a fact.

BTW, that lapdog is now working for Fox News. you

Yeah if my goal was to convince viewers that Dems are awful people, spear chucking Donna would be my first choice as who they see every day.

[DarrinS]

OJ Simpson couldn't be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's an exoneration, right?

Lulz

[Chris]

Mockingbird Media

[Spurtacular]

OJ Simpson couldn't be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's an exoneration, right?

The system is upright. Just ask Pavlov. They got it right on Hillary, obviously.

[Chris]

ChumpDumper you can retire your Pavlov troll account. The investigation is over

[boutons_deux]

Barr's Summary of Russian Cyber Interference in the 2016 Election Is Comically Light on Details

Barr’s summary, which mostly concerns the immediate implications for Trump and states there are no further planned indictments, is... four pages.

this one basically says, “No collusion!”

There’s no explanation of how Mueller’s team determined that no “U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate” was knowingly involved in the IRA efforts—

which more or less entailed dissemination of disinformation and propaganda on U.S. social media.

(Admittedly there was never any evidence of this, beyond speculation and some shared messaging tactics.)

The “knowingly” part may be a reference to Richard Pinedo, a man charged with iden y fraud for selling dummy bank accounts to Russians that later bought Facebook ads.

likely to be more contentious is how Mueller determined Trump or his associates had no direct connection to the hack of Democratic email systems,

given

the alarming degree of contact campaign associates had with Russian actors,

the candidate’s efforts to secure a Trump Tower Moscow deal, and

how Trump himself challenged Russia to hack Clinton.

there’s smoke, but Barr is insisting that Mueller’s investigation revealed no underlying fire.

That may well be true, but it would be nice to know how they verified nothing is burning.

the special counsel’s mission was to investigate “links and/or coordination” with the Russians.)

https://gizmodo.com/barrs-summary-of-russian-cyber-interference-in-the-2016-1833529980?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&u tm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmodo%2Ffull+%28Gizmodo%29

[boutons_deux]

‘In plain sight’: Counter-intelligence expert lambastes Barr claim that there was ‘no collusion’

Malcolm Nance said that he witnessed “collusion and conspiracy in plain sight,”

but special counsel Robert Mueller’s bar was so high, that unless it was observed by an agent, it’s impossible to prove.

“The part I’m mainly focused on is the question of conspiracy,” Nance told MSNBC’s Ari Melber on Sunday. “Whether there was an actual operation where, as Robert Mueller put it:

‘if there was explicit or tacit coordination’ in some way, shape or form…

We have had people who have done things before where there were, you know, there were not signs of an explicit agreement with them.

One, for example, is former CIA officer Aldrich Ames.

He started to do his treason in 1988, but

it wasn’t until he was caught making a chalk signal on the mailbox they saw an actual explicit act and then the FBI arrested him.”

Mueller’s standard was a legal one that wasn’t about winks and nudges, it had to be extremely clear.

“Well, you know, I saw all of the collusion and conspiracy in plain sight,” Nance said.

“The question is Robert Mueller’s standard for that — which is a legal standard for that —

which, to him, was if there is no a wink and a nod

that I can see or technically a signed SFB contract then I can’t bring them up on the charges.

But we have seen the things occur and in any other standard the person would have been arrested,

would have been polygraphed and

brought to trial.

I found that a high standard.

Maybe it’s a legal standard we need to take a look at, but

I want to hear him tell me

why the ‘Russia if you’re listening’ speech —

did he accept it as a joke?”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/pla...e+Raw+Story%29

[DMC]

DMC What exactly is wrong with that assumption?

Saying someone is substantially smarter than Trump should be a given. But to reassert what I said about hillary being smarter than Trump. She is. lol fatboi

"MVP"

You were carrying her torch and everyone here knows it.

[DMC]

Boots in full repository mode now, completely off the nuthouse reservation.

[DarrinS]

‘In plain sight’: Counter-intelligence expert lambastes Barr claim that there was ‘no collusion’

Malcolm Nance said that he witnessed “collusion and conspiracy in plain sight,”

but special counsel Robert Mueller’s bar was so high, that unless it was observed by an agent, it’s impossible to prove.

“The part I’m mainly focused on is the question of conspiracy,” Nance told MSNBC’s Ari Melber on Sunday. “Whether there was an actual operation where, as Robert Mueller put it:

‘if there was explicit or tacit coordination’ in some way, shape or form…

We have had people who have done things before where there were, you know, there were not signs of an explicit agreement with them.

One, for example, is former CIA officer Aldrich Ames.

He started to do his treason in 1988, but

it wasn’t until he was caught making a chalk signal on the mailbox they saw an actual explicit act and then the FBI arrested him.”

Mueller’s standard was a legal one that wasn’t about winks and nudges, it had to be extremely clear.

“Well, you know, I saw all of the collusion and conspiracy in plain sight,” Nance said.

“The question is Robert Mueller’s standard for that — which is a legal standard for that —

which, to him, was if there is no a wink and a nod

that I can see or technically a signed SFB contract then I can’t bring them up on the charges.

But we have seen the things occur and in any other standard the person would have been arrested,

would have been polygraphed and

brought to trial.

I found that a high standard.

Maybe it’s a legal standard we need to take a look at, but

I want to hear him tell me

why the ‘Russia if you’re listening’ speech —

did he accept it as a joke?”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/pla...e+Raw+Story%29

Malcolm Nance