the ones 17 US agencies, and Mueller do ented, and add in the Russians offering DJTjr dirt on Hillary for lifting Magnitsky sanction.
Now, GFY, comrade.
not really. only the AG could (rosenstein was acting AG for this matter). trump would have to order rosenstein, and rod said before congress that with the info he currently had, he would not follow such order. trump would have to fire rosenstein and put somebody in his place who would follow his order, aka recreate the saturday night massacre
Mueller says different... you don't trust Mueller, what changed?
You refused to believe your own eyes and ears.
Those are the plain facts and only the facts!
mueller has said nothing
barr wrote 4 pages to flatter trump
no one has seen the mueller report except the guy that trump handpicked to cover up his crimes
barr did that
no collusion... that's mueller's words. he left everything else open hoping the dip s in NY can make a case for their TDS so you're wrong again. barr/rr claimed no obstruction after reviewing mueller's report. re !
Barr would have been the ideal, willing Robert Bork to fire Mueller, then ascend to his current AG spot.
Dems could impeach, but Repug Senate would fail to convict, and Trash would be emboldened to keep ing up America.
so in your own words, what has trump ed up thus far in america? i'll wait...
Mueller specifically said there was no collusion. The direct quote was in the summary. Do you have terminal TDS so bad that you really think Mueller wouldn't say something if Barr's quote wasn't accurate?
I believe his tantrum is in response to the obstruction question, not collusion
That quote was not complete
barr omitted the first part and quoted mueller mid-sentence
it also does not say
”did not find” collusion
it says
”did not establish” collusion
therefore omitting the full sentence is cherry- picking what would most flatter trump
the obstruction part is even worse
how could trump obstruct when he asked comey to find those in his campaign who are colluding if such collusion exists, which it didn't. this is comey's own words on the hill so where's the obstruction mr. knowitall?
If his findings didn't establish collusion then by extension he did not find collusion. What is this, ing kindergarten?
Oh, you read the report?
terminal TDS
Before the Special Counsel was in place. I thought we were discussing Comey and obstruction?
There was no do entation of Russian approaches by 17 US agencies. You're just making up.
You listed on Russian approach that was set up by Fusion GPS. Which other Russian approaches are you referring to? Be specific.
Majority Say Trump Not Exonerated Of Collusion In Post-Mueller Poll
The poll, conducted by SSRS, found that 56 percent of Americans believe that Trump and his campaign “have not been exonerated, but collusion could not be proven,” while
43 percent say Trump and his campaign “have been exonerated of any collusion with Russia.”
this is the
second poll in as many days to suggest that Trump isn’t likely to get the political lift he’s hoping for from Barr’s letter.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/majority-say-trump-not-exonerated-of-collusion-in-post-mueller-poll?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_cam paign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29
Trash's cult mob don't care about his criminality, his traitorous disloyalty to America. They it's a ing game they want to win.
I'm seeing opinions that Mueller punted, copped out, after busting his ass for two years, letting Roz and Barr up his work, rather than conclude on obstruction.
i dont think there are time constraints on the obstruction stuff... would go throughout the course of the investigation
The TDS is worse than I thought
legally
it is not the same genius
mueller has to explain
1) if mueller found collusion - but then was directed by barr that doj policy is against indicting a president - then it could result in - “trump conspired - but doj policy will not allow me to indict - therefore i cannot establish conspiracy/collusion”
2) trump and campaign colluded - but their collusion amounted to 49% - and i needed 50% - to establish
3) trump is 100% squeaky clean - so this collusion question is a waste of time
and that is just parsing the “did not establish” part
imagine what else barr tried to sanitize?
why does barr need weeks- when he could get all hands on deck and release it in two or three days
because trumps plan is to distract america with “ive been exonerated” for a few weeks and idiots like you will attack patriots like me who want the truth
The obstruction charge as I understood was always related to the firing of Comey, not obstructing Mueller's investigation.
Barr said no collusion with Russian GOVERNMENT, leaving non-Russian-govt operators as possible colluders.
As long as Repugs hide Mueller's report, the serious doubts about Trash remain.
My extremely well-informed guess is that the report contains a lot of evidence of collusion AND obstruction, but not enough for criminal indictment, and plenty enough for impeachment.
I sure the SDNY, etc investigations would report ASAP, to get this criminal fraud, traitor out of office. And Pence, too, LIED about Flynn.
being wrong about everything and calling people who were right all along treasonous Russian traitors does not make you a patriot, it makes you a ing idiot.
go yourself
you saw the helsinki video with your own eyes and
STILL
supported the traitor
that is all that needs to be said about a piece of like you
so has trump taken any action against russia now that russia’s attack has been confirmed?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
