You're whining.But write me an essay
If you can't do it just say so.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
Either answer or say you can't answer.
OK, you can't answer.
I accept your white flag forever on this subject.
lol derp
I accept you have no Jacobs to lose.
Lots of words to just wave a white flag. Surrender accepted.
huh?
I asked you a simple question about your claim.
You yourself.
End of story.
lol derp
No Manhood Chump
If you can't do it just say so.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
Either answer or say you can't answer.
You had an epic tantrum there, sport. Now you're just tuckered out.
I asked you a simple question.
Just answer it or say you can't.
that you're too socially re ed to watch an 18 second video.
That isn't your answering in your own words.
You can't do it.
That's fine.
Still throwing your tantrum.
Still throwing your tantrum.
derp
You got your bone, . I don't need to hear how it tastes.
derp
You can't answer a simple question about a claim you made.
Live with it and stop whining.
You jump in harping on the trivial and think I'm supposed to care when you throw your tantrum.
Par.
No, I asked you directly about your claim.
All you've done is yourself.
Go back into your fetal position.
Looks like the press is beginning to turn on Beto, and "Mayor Pete" is the new golden boy. Nothing but positive fluff pieces lately.
The process of speed dating all of the candidates who haven't been in politics long enough to have a real track record is now fully underway. I'm sure it'll be a few weeks until we find out about skeletons in Buttigeg's (if I spelled that wrong, I don't care) closet and the media will move onto a new darling upstart candidate. There's not a chance that guy has any real shot at winning the primary, and he'd get smoked by Trump in a general.
I would basically group all of the candidates into these buckets, with the first three buckets having a huge advantage:
1) The candidates who actually have a progressive track record prior to 2016 but don't have the personality a presidential candidate needs:
Sanders
Warren
2) The establishment candidate who doesn't even try to pretend he's a progressive but might still win because he has the one thing your average Democratic primary voter looks for, celebrity status and name recognition:
Biden
O'Rourke
3) The female establishment senator who wants to rebrand herself as a progressive despite being a Clinton supporter 4 years ago and having floods of special interest money:
Harris
Klobuchar
Gillibrand
4) The seasoned ex-governor who might actually be a good candidate but doesn't have the name recognition/celebrity status that most superficial Democratic primary voters look for:
John Hickenlooper
Steve Bullock
Jay Inslee
5) The minority who people saw as a trendy future candidate 4+ years ago but hasn't done anything recently to excite voters:
Castro
Booker
Holder (already announced he wasn't running)
6) The young and inexperienced house liberal who's running way too soon:
Tulsi Gabbard
Tim Ryan
Eric Swallwell
Seth Moulton
After that, it's pretty much a hodgepodge of unknowns who hope to create appeal by being the guy no one has ever ing heard of.
O'Rourke is certainly pretending to be a progressive, despite basically having no record as a congressman.
You still crying?
... ain't no liberal, no progressive
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
