Reply With Quote
That's the hill you want to die on? Just out of curiosity what is the burden of proof for the so called "Allegations" to be accepted as facts?
You said Russians which has not been proven. All has been proven is they were Russian accounts. But easily could have been Mericans I. Russia, brittish or whoever in Russi. Or accounts using a VPN
Therefore your statement is factually wrong or at least based on mere Allegations not facts
That's the hill you want to die on? Just out of curiosity what is the burden of proof for the so called "Allegations" to be accepted as facts?
Umm evidence??
Obstruction = Not concerning.
Spirit Cooking = HOLY THIS IS HUGE
Umm the fact is they were Russian accounts as you yourself had said
This is a pretty good statement.
Which means nothing as anyone can post with a Russian account. Thanks to VPN
And this is a pretty good response.
That's just another opinion. ^
No obstruction charge was brought.
That's typically what official statements are.
It could also mean they were Russian
The ever-changing criteria behind what you choose to be concerned about.
Could is not fact. Therefore your statement was not factual
Not even close. We learned a lot about Trump and his ilk with this report. Even though it's redacted to .
Your laziness is not an excuse to say this report its crap.
It’s a correct statement but purposely fail to mention no one knew it was Russians setting up the rallies.
He referred it to congress and stated they actually can criminalize his actions
Exonerated? N’yet!
No one in Congress is going to do . Mueller was their one shot to take out Trump and he didn’t.He referred it to congress and stated they actually can criminalize his actions
ive pointed this out ad nauseum to idiots like TSA
his response: “does not compute”
ing idiot
No need for me to read 400 pages to learn Trump is an asshole. Already knew that. The report brings nothing new
I didn’t ask you what they would do. I said Mueller stayed in his report congress can criminalize his actions regarding obstruction and witness tampering
If your dumb ass read the report you would know that instead of looking for cliffnotes
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The number of Americans who approve of President Donald Trump dropped by 3 percentage points to the lowest level of the year following the release of a special counsel report detailing Russian interference in the last U.S. presidential election, according to an exclusive Reuters/Ipsos public opinion poll.Post another poll from Monday and see how that works out
The poll, conducted Thursday afternoon to Friday morning, is the first national survey to measure the response from the American public after the U.S. Justice Department released Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report that recounted numerous occasions in which Trump may have interfered with the investigation.
According to the poll, 37 percent of adults in the United States approved of Trump’s performance in office, down from 40 percent in a similar poll conducted on April 15 and matching the lowest level of the year. That is also down from 43 percent in a poll conducted shortly after U.S. Attorney General William Barr circulated a summary of the report in March.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1RV16S
Is it as hilarious as you having your God Mueller curbstomp the conspiracy theory you pushed daily for over 2 years?
1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."
3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."
4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."
5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."
6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or cons uted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."
7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
Is it as hilarious as losing a $2000 bet on a conspiracy theory you pushed and not having the money to pay it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
