Mueller vs Barr round 1

[Pavlov]

My reading comprehension is fine, the problem is you just read a tweet and accept it as fact instead of watching and listening to what Barr actually says. Do you not understand that Barr said they didn’t question anything Mueller presented and took it as fact? The makes the fact that Barr and Rosenstein didn’t charge obstruction even funnier since they could made Mueller’s team look even more pathetic.

acting like anyone at DOJ thought they could charge Trump.

Makes you look even more pathetic.

Poor fella.

[boutons_deux]

Barr blows off 2nd day, subpoena and censure by House incoming

[Reck]

My reading comprehension is fine, the problem is you just read a tweet and accept it as fact instead of watching and listening to what Barr actually says. Do you not understand that Barr said they didn’t question anything Mueller presented and took it as fact? The makes the fact that Barr and Rosenstein didn’t charge obstruction even funnier since they could made Mueller’s team look even more pathetic.

Son, you take your cues from QAnon and Gorka and those heads that dont know what planet they are even on.

Dont talk to me about taking a tweet as fact when you follow these people I mentioned and eat their sandwich.

[boutons_deux]

Pootin i s laughing his ass off at how his puppet Trash has ed up America

[Spurs Homer]

My reading comprehension is fine, the problem is you just read a tweet and accept it as fact instead of watching and listening to what Barr actually says. Do you not understand that Barr said they didn’t question anything Mueller presented and took it as fact? The makes the fact that Barr and Rosenstein didn’t charge obstruction even funnier since they could made Mueller’s team look even more pathetic.

lolol

so when mueller testifies and says trump committed crimes but mueller was prevented from indicting because of olc/doj policy


where will you move the goalpost to?

when mueller testifies that it has always been the duty of congress


not barr

which rt wing tweet will you peddle?


you make ducks look like a phd scholar lololol

[TSA]

Son, you take your cues from QAnon and Gorka and those heads that dont know what planet they are even on.

Dont talk to me about taking a tweet as fact when you follow these people I mentioned and eat their sandwich.

I’ll talk to you about taking that tweet as fact because you did. Do you not understand that Barr said they didn’t question anything Mueller presented and took it as fact?

[TSA]

lolol

so when mueller testifies and says trump committed crimes but mueller was prevented from indicting because of olc/doj policy


where will you move the goalpost to?

when mueller testifies that it has always been the duty of congress


not barr

which rt wing tweet will you peddle?


you make ducks look like a phd scholar lololol

Mueller had every chance to say Trump committed crimes in his report but he didn’t, and that isn’t going to change when he testifies.

Mueller testifying will not go how you are hoping it will. It will blow up in your face just like the Russia investigation, just like Mueller’s report, and just like today’s hearing.

[Spurs Homer]

Mueller had every chance to say Trump committed crimes in his report but he didn’t, and that isn’t going to change when he testifies.

Mueller testifying will not go how you are hoping it will. It will blow up in your face just like the Russia investigation, just like Mueller’s report, and just like today’s hearing.

you didnt read the report pizzagate whack job

lolol

[a777pilot]

I hate to burst the bubble you live inside, but 99% of voters didn't watch, and won't remember a thing about, the hearing today.

Boy, that is true.

I did watch just one small portion and I'm glade I did. I saw Senator "I served in Vietnam" Blumenthal try to get AG Barr to say Muller disagreed with him, Barr. Barr said they had a phone conversation and there were notes. Blumenthal, "Can I have those note?". Barr, "No!" Blumenthal, "Why not?" Barr, "Why should you."

I think I am going to like this AG.

[Pavlov]

afraid to show his non-existent notes.

[Spurs Homer]

afraid to show his non-existent notes.

Did anyone at the WH or Trump himself ever ask or suggest that you open an investigation on anyone?

"uh - I don't remember - uh Im grappling with the word suggest"


liars gonna lie!

[a777pilot]

Barr blows off 2nd day, subpoena and censure by House incoming

Both of those, subpoena and censure, are meaningless. He's the AG.

[Will Hunting]

I hate to burst the bubble you live inside, but 99% of voters didn't watch, and won't remember a thing about, the hearing today.

Yeah you clearly didn’t understand my post (I didn’t watch the hearing today either FWIW) and are agreeing with my point. At this point the Dems are ing themselves over in 2020 by refusing to drop Russiagate.

[a777pilot]

afraid to show his non-existent notes.

I'm still waiting for Comey's notes. Have you seen them?

[Will Hunting]

Hoe does he win Michigan/Pennsylvania and Wisconsin again?

If he does, he has to do it by double, maybe even triple the margin he did the last time. Trump has gotten less and less popular even on Trump states so I'm curious to know what you're seeing.

Which dem candidates do you think wins against Trump?

How does he win those states again? He runs against another moderate with a ty track record on free trade who inspires the same ty voter turnout your girl Hillary inspired. His approval rating is in the low 40s in all three of those states but you’re ignoring voter turnout and the fact the pollsters clearly have no ing idea how to poll the rust belt. The polling in those states doesn’t look any worse for Trump now than it did pre election in 2016.

I think Sanders, Warren, Inslee, and Beto all beat Trump easily.

Biden probably wins just from being a likeable white male but it’d be closer than people think.

Gillibrand, Harris, Klobuchar & Buttigieg all lose to Trump imo.

[a777pilot]

One salient point to keep in mind for the Democrats and the members of the Obama Administration, the one point that got Nixon into hot water with impeachment was his misuse of the CIA and FBI toobstructe justice and to spy on the Democrat Party.

Obama and his minions, are in deep kimchi.

That unsung hero of all of this, who I am still waiting for y'all to figure out who, is going to put a mul ude of Obama people, and just possibly, Obama himself in serious legal jeopardy.

[TSA]

you didnt read the report pizzagate whack job

lolol

Read enough to know Mueller all over the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy you 100% fell for, pushed, and believed in.

[TSA]

Yeah you clearly didn’t understand my post (I didn’t watch the hearing today either FWIW) and are agreeing with my point. At this point the Dems are ing themselves over in 2020 by refusing to drop Russiagate.

Yeah you clearly didn’t understand “my” post

[TSA]

Yeah you clearly didn’t understand my post (I didn’t watch the hearing today either FWIW) and are agreeing with my point. At this point the Dems are ing themselves over in 2020 by refusing to drop Russiagate.

Yeah you clearly didn’t understand “my” post

[Pavlov]

I'm still waiting for Comey's notes. Have you seen them?

Yes.

Over a year ago.

You seriously didn't know they were released.

[Pavlov]

One salient point to keep in mind for the Democrats and the members of the Obama Administration, the one point that got Nixon into hot water with impeachment was his misuse of the CIA and FBI toobstructe justice and to spy on the Democrat Party.

Obama and his minions, are in deep kimchi.

That unsung hero of all of this, who I am still waiting for y'all to figure out who, is going to put a mul ude of Obama people, and just possibly, Obama himself in serious legal jeopardy.

What are all those people going to be charged with?

You keep ducking that question.

[spurraider21]

Mueller had every chance to say Trump committed crimes in his report but he didn’t, and that isn’t going to change when he testifies.

Mueller testifying will not go how you are hoping it will. It will blow up in your face just like the Russia investigation, just like Mueller’s report, and just like today’s hearing.

nope, he wasn't allowed to

[DarrinS]

nope, he wasn't allowed to

????

[a777pilot]

"I think Sanders, Warren, Inslee, and Beto all beat Trump easily."

I think you are also in favor of legalizing drugs.

[spurraider21]

????

directly from the mueller report:

Third, we considered whether to evaluate the conduct we investigated under the Justice Manual standards governing prosecution and declination decisions, but we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes. The threshold step under the Justice Manual standards is to assess whether a person's conduct"cons utes a federal offense." U.S. Dep't of Justice, Justice Manual§ 9-27.220 (2018) (JusticeManual). Fairness concerns counseled against potentially reaching that judgment when no charges can be brought. The ordinary means for an individual to respond to an accusation is through a speedy and public trial, with all the procedural protections that surround a criminal case. An individual who believes he was wrongly accused can use that process to seek to clear his name. In contrast, a prosecutor's judgment that crimes were committed, but that no charges will be brought, affords no such adversarial opportunity for public name-clearing before an impartial adjudicator.

The concerns about the fairness of such a determination would be heightened in the case of a sitting President, where a federal prosecutor's accusation of a crime, even in an internal report, could carry consequences that extend beyond the realm of criminal justice. OLC noted similar concerns about sealed indictments. Even if an indictment were sealed during the President's term, OLC reasoned, "it would be very difficult to preserve [an indictment's] secrecy," and if an indictment became public, "[t]he stigma and opprobrium" could imperil the President's ability to govern." Although a prosecutor's internal report would not represent a formal public accusation akin to an indictment, the possibility of the report's public disclosure and the absence of a neutral adjudicatory forum to review its findings counseled against potentially determining "that the person's conduct cons utes a federal offense." Justice Manual § 9-27.220.